Skip to main content
Log in

The value of true axial imaging for CT staging of colonic cancer

  • Oncology
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess the effect of true axial computed tomography on the accuracy of staging of colonic cancers.

Method

Fifty consecutive datasets were independently assessed by three radiologists, experienced in colorectal cancer staging. The first read was of standard axial images only. The second read was 6 weeks later and true axial images, through the tumour and perpendicular to its long axis, were included.

Results

The overall accuracy for tumour staging was 56% for reader 1, 48% for reader 2 and 64% for reader 3 for standard axial CT. This improved to 72% (p = 0.012), 66% (p = 0.012) and 80% (p = 0.021) when the true axial images were added. For nodal staging, overall accuracy improved from 56% to 70% (p = 0.065) for reader 1, 58% to 76% (p = 0.012) for reader 2 and 60% to 76% (p = 0.021) for reader 3 between reads.

Conclusion

The accuracy of CT staging of colonic tumours is significantly improved by reviewing images reconstructed in a plane perpendicular to the long axis of the tumour. The accuracy achieved by this analysis is similar to that of CT colonography but avoids the extra complexity, additional cost and increased complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CancerStats. 2007; Available from: http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/incidence/?a=5441. Accessed November 16, 2010

  2. Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ, Hulnick D, Naidich DP (1988) Carcinoma of the colon: detection and preoperative staging by CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 150(2):301–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Freeny PC, Marks WM, Ryan JA, Bolen JW (1986) Colorectal carcinoma evaluation with CT: preoperative staging and detection of postoperative recurrence. Radiology 158(2):347–353

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hundt W, Braunschweig R, Reiser M (1999) Evaluation of spiral CT in staging of colon and rectum carcinoma. Eur Radiol 9(1):78–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mauchley DC, Lynge DC, Langdale LA, Stelzner MG, Mock CN, Billingsley KG (2005) Clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of routine preoperative computed tomography scanning in patients with colon cancer. Am J Surg 189(5):512–517, discussion 517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM et al (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown G, Daniels IR, Richardson C, Revell P, Peppercorn D, Bourne M (2005) Techniques and trouble-shooting in high spatial resolution thin slice MRI for rectal cancer. Br J Radiol 78(927):245–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sobin LH, Wittekind C (eds) (2002) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 6th edn. Wiley-Liss, New York

  9. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wieder HA, Rosenberg R, Lordick F, Geinitz H, Beer A, Becker K et al (2007) Rectal cancer: MR imaging before neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for prediction of tumor-free circumferential resection margins and long-term survival. Radiology 243(3):744–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. MECURY (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study. BMJ 333(7572):779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith NJ, Bees N, Barbachano Y, Norman AR, Swift RI, Brown G (2007) Preoperative computed tomography staging of nonmetastatic colon cancer predicts outcome: implications for clinical trials. Br J Cancer 96(7):1030–1036

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Burton S, Brown G, Bees N, Norman A, Biedrzycki O, Arnaout A et al (2008) Accuracy of CT prediction of poor prognostic features in colonic cancer. Br J Radiol 81(961):10–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gray PR, Morton MD, Seymour PM. FOxTROT: fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin & targeted receptor pre-operative therapy for colon cancer. A randomised trial assessing whether preoperative chemotherapy and/or an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody improve outcome in high-risk opera- ble colon cancer. [cited 2009 20/07/2009]; Available from: http://www.foxtrot.bham.ac.uk/

  15. Chung DJ, Huh KC, Choi WJ, Kim JK (2005) CT colonography using 16-MDCT in the evaluation of colorectal cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(1):98–103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Harvey CJ, Amin Z, Hare CM, Gillams AR, Novelli MR, Boulos PB et al (1998) Helical CT pneumocolon to assess colonic tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170(6):1439–1443

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanamoto T, Matsuki M, Okuda J, Inada Y, Tatsugami F, Tanikake M et al (2007) Preoperative evaluation of local invasion and metastatic lymph nodes of colorectal cancer and mesenteric vascular variations using multidetector-row computed tomography before laparoscopic surgery. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31(6):831–839

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Filippone A, Ambrosini R, Fuschi M, Marinelli T, Genovesi D, Bonomo L (2004) Preoperative T and N staging of colorectal cancer: accuracy of contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT colonography–initial experience. Radiology 231(1):83–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sinha R, Verma R, Rajesh A, Richards CJ (2006) Diagnostic value of multidetector row CT in rectal cancer staging: comparison of multiplanar and axial images with histopathology. Clin Radiol 61(11):924–931

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kulinna C, Eibel R, Matzek W, Bonel H, Aust D, Strauss T et al (2004) Staging of rectal cancer: diagnostic potential of multiplanar reconstructions with MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(2):421–427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown G, Kirkham A, Williams GT, Bourne M, Radcliffe AG, Sayman J et al (2004) High-resolution MRI of the anatomy important in total mesorectal excision of the rectum. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182(2):431–439

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Brown G, Radcliffe AG, Newcombe RG, Dallimore NS, Bourne MW, Williams GT (2003) Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Surg 90(3):355–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ewan M. Anderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, E.M., Betts, M. & Slater, A. The value of true axial imaging for CT staging of colonic cancer. Eur Radiol 21, 1286–1292 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-2019-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-2019-9

Keywords

Navigation