Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumours: effect of post-ablation margin on local tumour progression

  • Interventional
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the relationship between post-ablation margins and local tumour progression following radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinomas and colorectal liver metastases.

Methods

Eighty-three patients with 107 hepatic tumours who underwent RFA were divided into two groups: the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) group (55 patients with 69 lesions) and the colorectal liver metastases group (28 patients with 38 lesions). Post-ablation margins were calculated on 1-month follow-up contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies. Efficacy was evaluated at 1-month post-ablation, then at 3-month intervals for the first year and biannually thereafter.

Results

The results of the log-rank test showed that the minimum threshold post-ablation margin of 0.4 cm (P = 0.020) and tumour size smaller than 2.5 cm (P = 0.001) significantly correlated with local control for the HCC group. In the colorectal liver metastases group, the results of the log-rank test showed that the minimum threshold post-ablation margin of 0.4 cm (P = 0.345) and tumour size smaller than 2.5 cm (P = 0.168) did not correlate with local control.

Conclusion

Percutaneous RFA is more effective in achieving local control in patients with HCCs than with colorectal liver metastases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vivarelli M, Guglielmi A, Ruzzenente A et al (2004) Surgical resection versus percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhotic liver. Ann Surg 240:102–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hong SN, Lee SY, Choi MS et al (2005) Comparing the outcomes of radiofrequency ablation and surgery in patients with a single small hepatocellular carcinoma and well-preserved hepatic function. J Clin Gastroenterol 39:247–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mazzaferro V, Battiston C, Perrone S et al (2004) Radiofrequency ablation of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation: a prospective study. Ann Surg 240:900–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gillams AR, Lees WR (2005) Radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases. Abdom Imaging 30:419–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberg SN, Grassi CJ, Gardella JF et al (2005) Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria. Radiology 235:728–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu HC, Cheng JS, Lai KH et al (2005) Factors for early tumor recurrence of single small hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation therapy. World J Gastroenterol 11:1439–1444

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tatelshi R, Shiina S, Teratani T et al (2005) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for HCC: an analysis of 1000 cases. Cancer 103:1201–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shibata T, Shibata T, Maetani Y, Isoda H, Hiraoka M (2006) Radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma: prospective comparison of internally cooled electrode and expandable electrode. Radiology 238:346–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Livraghi T, Solbiati L, Meloni F, Ierace T, Goldberg SN, Gazelle GS (2003) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases in potential candidates for resection: the “test-of-time” approach. Cancer 97:3027–3035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gervais DA, Arellano RS, Mueller PR (2006) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of ovarian cancer metastasis to the liver: indications, outcomes, and role in patient management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:746–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Komorizono Y, Oketani M, Sako K et al (2003) Risk factors for local recurrence of small hepatocellular carcinoma tumors after a single session, single application of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. Cancer 97:1253–1262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hori T, Nagata K, Hasuike S et al (2003) Risk factors for the local recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after a single session of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. J Gastroenterol 38:977–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sofocleous CT, Nascimento RG, Petrovic LM et al (2008) Histopathologic and immunohistochemical features of tissue adherent to multitined electrodes after RF ablation of liver malignancies can help predict local tumor progression: initial results. Radiology 249:364–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakazawa T, Kokubu S, Shibuya A et al (2007) Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation between local tumor progression after ablation and ablative margin. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:480–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Montgomery RS, Rahal A, Dodd GD 3rd, Leyendecker JR, Hubbard LG (2004) Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors: variability of lesion size using a single ablation device. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182:657–661

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hansler J, Frieser M, Tietz V et al (2007) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors using multiple saline-perfused electrodes. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18:405–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Harrison LE, Koneru B, Baramipour P et al (2003) Locoregional recurrences are frequent after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 197:759–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van Duijnhoven FH, Jansen MC, Junggeburt JM et al (2006) Factors influencing the local failure rate of radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 13:651–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Okusaka T, Okada S, Ueno H et al (2002) Satellite lesions in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma with reference to clinicopathologic features. Cancer 95:1931–1937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoffman AL, Wu SS, Obaid AK et al (2002) Histologic evaluation and treatment outcome after sequential radiofrequency ablation and hepatic resection for primary and metastatic tumors. Am Surg 68:1038–1043

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cady B, Jenkins RL, Steele GD et al (1998) Surgical margin in hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis: a critical and improvable determinant of outcome. Ann Surg 227:566–571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Solbiati L, Livraghi T, Goldberg SN et al (2001) Percutaneous radio-frequency ablation of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: long-term results in 117 patients. Radiology 221:159–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Livraghi T, Goldberg SN, Lazzaroni S et al (2000) Hepatocellular carcinoma: radio-frequency ablation of medium and large lesions. Radiology 214:761–768

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tezuka M, Hayashi K, Kubota K et al (2007) Growth rate of locally recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: comparing the growth rate of locally recurrent tumor with that of primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci 52:783–788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald S. Arellano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, CH., Arellano, R.S., Uppot, R.N. et al. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumours: effect of post-ablation margin on local tumour progression. Eur Radiol 20, 877–885 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1610-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1610-4

Keywords

Navigation