Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Calculations of cardiovascular shunts and regurgitation using magnetic resonance ventricular volume and aortic and pulmonary flow measurements

  • Magnetic Resonance
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance measurements of the volumes of the right and left ventricle and of the flows in the ascending aorta and main pulmonary artery contribute to the assessment of patients with valvular regurgitation or intracardiac or extracardiac shunts. Ventricular volumes are measured by planimetry and summation of end-diastolic and end-systolic areas measured in a stack of ventricular short-axis cines. The volumes of blood flowing through planes transecting the great arteries are measured using phase contrast velocity mapping. The two approaches are essentially different and can be used either for mutual validation, or separately or in combination to quantify regurgitation and/or shunting. In the presence of shunts, the relations between the stroke volumes and arterial flows of each side of the heart vary depending on the level of shunting (for example, atrial, ventricular or ductal). Conclusion: This article aims to explain and illustrate the technical and theoretical basis for calculations using volumetric and flow measurements, providing formulae and diagrams to facilitate the interpretation of results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CMR:

cardiovascular magnetic resonance

LV:

left ventricle

RV:

right ventricle

SV:

stroke volume

V:

volume

EDV:

end diastolic volume

ESV:

end systolic volume

Ao:

ascending aorta

MPA:

main pulmonary artery

R-R interval:

interval between two successive R peaks of the electrocardiogram

RA:

right atrium

QAo :

ascending aortic flow volume (per beat)

QMPA :

pulmonary flow volume (per beat)

QP :

pulmonary flow volume (per beat)

QS :

systemic flow volume (per beat)

VENC:

velocity encoding range

References

  1. Nigri M, Azevedo CF, Rochitte CE, Schraibman V, Tarasoutchi F, Pommerantzeff PM, Brandão CM, Sampaio RO, Parga JR, Avila LF, Spina GS, Grinberg M (2009) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging identifies focal regions of intramyocardial fibrosis in patients with severe aortic valve disease: correlation with quantitative histopathology. Am Heart J 157:361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Isbell DC, Kramer CM (2006) Magnetic resonance for the assessment of myocardial viability. Curr Opin Cardiol 21:469–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan KMJ, Wage R, Symmonds K, Rahman-Haley S, Mohiaddin R, Firmin DN, Pepper J, Pennell DJ, Kilner PJ (2008) Towards comprehensive assessment of mitral regurgitation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Res 10:61–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carr JC, Simonetti O, Bundy J, Li D, Pereles S, Finn JP (2001) Cine MR angiography of the heart with segmented true fast imaging with steady-state precession. Radiol 219:828–834

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Maceira A, Prasad S, Khan M, Pennell D (2006) Normalized left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Res 8:417–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maceira AM, Prasad SK, Khan M, Pennell DJ (1-12-2006) Reference right ventricular systolic and diastolic function normalized to age, gender and body surface area from steady-state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J 27:2879–2888

  7. Winter M, Bernink F, Groenink M, Bouma B, van Dijk A, Helbing W, Tijssen J, Mulder B (2008) Evaluating the systemic right ventricle by CMR: the importance of consistent and reproducible delineation of the cavity. J Cardiovasc Magn Res 10:40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Axel L (2004) Papillary muscles do not attach directly to the solid heart wall. Circ 109:3145–3148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ibrahim T (1999) Effect of papillary muscles and trabeculae on left ventricular parameters in cinemagnetic resonance images. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 1:319–319

    Google Scholar 

  10. Codella NCF, Weinsaft JW, Cham MD, Janik M, Prince MR, Wang Y (2008) Left ventricle: automated segmentation by using myocardial effusion threshold reduction and intravoxel computation at MR imaging. Radiol 248:1004–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gatehouse P, Keegan J, Crowe L, Masood S, Mohiaddin R, Kreitner KF, Firmin D (2005) Applications of phase-contrast flow and velocity imaging in cardiovascular MRI. Eur Radiol 15:2172–2184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kilner PJ, Gatehouse PD, Firmin DN (2007) Flow measurement by magnetic resonance: a unique asset worth optimising. J Cardiovasc Magn Res 9:723–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chernobelsky A, Shubayev O, Comeau CR, Wolff SD (2007) Baseline correction of phase contrast images improves quantification of blood flow in the great vessels. J Cardiovasc Magn Res 9:681–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sebastian K, Juerg Schwitter E (2001) Aortic and mitral regurgitation: quantification using moving slice velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 14:106–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sebastian K, Markus BS (1999) Heart motion adapted cine phase-contrast flow measurements through the aortic valve. Magn Reson Med 42:970–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Caruthers SD, Lin SJ, Brown P, Watkins MP, Williams TA, Lehr KA, Wickline SA (4-11-2003) Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography. Circ 108:2236–2243

  17. Wittlinger T, Dzemali O, Bakhtiary F, Moritz A, Kleine P (2008) Hemodynamic evaluation of aortic regurgitation by magnetic resonance imaging. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 16:278–283

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gelfand EV (2006) Severity of mitral and aortic regurgitation as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimizing correlation with Doppler echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Res 8:503–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grothoff M, Spors B, bdul-Khaliq H, Gutberlet M (10-2-2008) Evaluation of postoperative pulmonary regurgitation after surgical repair of tetralogy of Fallot: comparison between Doppler echocardiography and MR velocity mapping. Pediatr Radiol 38:186–191

  20. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O’Gara PT, O’Rourke RA, Otto CM, Shah PM, Shanewise JS (2006) ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circ 114:e84–e231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O’Gara PT, O’Rourke RA, Otto CM, Shah PM, Shanewise JS, Nishimura RA, Carabello BA, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Lytle BW, O’Gara PT, O’Rourke RA, Shah PM (2008) 2008 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:e1–e142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Correction for Bonow et al. Circulation 114(5):e84–e231. (17-4-2007) Circ 115:e409- Available via: http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/115/15/e409, Accessed 18 June 2009

  23. Moon JCC, Lorenz CH, Francis JM, Smith GC, Pennell DJ (2002) Breath-hold FLASH and FISP cardiovascular MR imaging: left ventricular volume differences and reproducibility. Radiol 223:789–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kon MW, Myerson SG, Moat NE, Pennell D (2004) Quantification of regurgitant fraction in mitral regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of techniques. J Heart Valve Dis 13:600–607

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chatzimavroudis GP, Walker PG, Oshinski JN, Franch RH, Pettigrew RI, Yoganathan AP (1997) Slice location dependence of aortic regurgitation measurements with MR phase velocity mapping. Magn Reson Med 37:545–551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wald RM, Redington AN, Pereira A, Provost YL, Paul NS, Oechslin EN, Silversides CK (2009) Refining the assessment of pulmonary regurgitation in adults after tetralogy of Fallot repair: should we be measuring regurgitant fraction or regurgitant volume? Eur Heart J 30:356–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gerbode F, Hultrgen H, Melrose D, Osborn J (1958) Syndrome of left ventricular-right atrial shunt: successful surgical repair in five cases with observation of bradycardia on closure. Ann Surg 148:433–446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel G. H. Devos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Devos, D.G.H., Kilner, P.J. Calculations of cardiovascular shunts and regurgitation using magnetic resonance ventricular volume and aortic and pulmonary flow measurements. Eur Radiol 20, 410–421 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1568-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1568-2

Keywords

Navigation