Abstract
Breast screening specificity is improved if previous mammograms are available, which presents a challenge when converting to digital mammography. Two display options were investigated: mounting previous film mammograms on a multiviewer adjacent to the workstation, or digitising them for soft copy display. Eight qualified screen readers were videotaped undertaking routine screen reading for two 45-min sessions in each scenario. Analysis of gross eye and head movements showed that when digitised, previous mammograms were examined a greater number of times per case (p = 0.03), due to a combination of being used in 19% more cases (p = 0.04) and where used, looked at a greater number of times (28% increase, p = 0.04). Digitising previous mammograms reduced both the average time taken per case by 18% (p = 0.04) and the participants’ perceptions of workload (p < 0.05). Digitising previous analogue mammograms may be advantageous, in particular in increasing their level of use.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E et al (2005) Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 353:1773–1783. doi:10.1056/Nejmoa052911
Skaane P, Skjennald A (2004) Screen-film mammography versus digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population based study—the Oslo Ii study. Radiology 232:197–204
Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA, Hofvind S, Skaane P (2008) Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the vestfold county study. Eur Radiol 18:183–191
Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S et al (2007) Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. Am J Roentgenol 189:860–866
Burnside ES, Sickles EA, Sohlich RE, Dee KE (2002) Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1173–1177
Callaway MP, Boggis CR, Astley SA, Hutt I (1997) The influence of previous films on screening mammographic interpretation and detection of breast carcinoma. Clin Radiol 52:527–529
Thurfjell MG, Vitak B, Azavedo E, Svane G, Thurfjell E (2000) Effect on sensitivity and specificity of mammography screening with or without comparison of old mammograms. Acta Radiol 41:52–56
Sumkin JH, Holbert BL, Herrmann JS et al (2003) Optimal reference mammography: a comparison of mammograms obtained 1 and 2 years before the present examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:343–346
Varela C, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JHCL, Holland R (2005) Use of previous mammograms in the classification of benign and malignant masses. Eur J Radiol 56:248–255
Roelofs AA, Karssemeijer N, Wedekind N et al (2007) Importance of comparison of current and previous mammograms in breast cancer screening. Radiology 242:70–77. doi:10.1148/Radiol.2421050684
Liston J, Wilson R, Cooke J et al (2005) Quality assurance guidelines for breast cancer screening radiology. NHSBSP Publication No 59
Gale AG (2003) PERFORMS—a self assessment scheme for radiologists in breast screening. seminars in breast disease: improving and monitoring mammographic interpretative skills 6:148–152
Chan HP, Vyborny CJ, Macmahon H, Metz CE, Doi K, Sickles EA (1987) Digital mammography: roc studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications. Invest Radiol 22:581
Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Human mental workload. North-Holland, Oxford, pp 139–183
Chan HP, Niklason LT, Ikeda DM, Lam KL, Adler DD (1994) Digitization requirements in mammography: effects on computer-aided detection of microcalcifications. Med Phys 21:1203
Nab HW, Karssemeijer N, Van Erning L, Hendriks JHCL (1992) Comparison of digital and conventional mammography: a ROC study of 270 mammograms. Med Inform Internet Med 17:125–131
Ruschin M, Hemdal B, Andersson I et al (2005) Threshold pixel size for shape determination of microcalcifications in digital mammography: a pilot study. Radiat Prot Dosimet 114:415–423
Karssemeijer N, Frieling JTM, Hendriks JHCL (1993) Spatial resolution in digital mammography. Invest Radiol 28:413
Khoo LA, Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM (2005) Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom national breast screening programme: prospective study. Radiology 237:444–449
Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J et al (2008) Utilization and cost of diagnostic imaging and biopsies following positive screening mammography in the southern breast cancer screening region of the Netherlands 2000–2005. Eur Radiol 18:2390–2397
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of the participants and staff at the Warwickshire, Solihull and Coventry Breast Screening Service at University Hospital Coventry who gave up their time to assist with this research, and the NHS Breast Screening Programme for their support. MGW receives research funding from the NIHR and the Cambridge Biomedical Research Group
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taylor-Phillips, S., Wallis, M.G. & Gale, A.G. Should previous mammograms be digitised in the transition to digital mammography?. Eur Radiol 19, 1890–1896 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1366-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1366-x