Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of multidetector row CT angiography in the diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia. Ninety-three consecutive studies on 91 patients with clinically suspected acute mesenteric ischemia underwent abdominal CT angiography as the first, and usually the sole, diagnostic procedure. CT was performed with a multidetector 16-row CT system from the level of the diaphragm to the pelvis in two phases: early arterial and late portal phase. CT examinations were reviewed by the duty radiologist. Final diagnosis was established by a senior radiologist. CTA was diagnostic in 92 studies. Mesenteric ischemia was diagnosed in 18 patients, 14 of them were of the thromboembolic type and four from the nonocclusive type. Positive CTA findings were confirmed by surgery in 13 patients and by clinical follow-up in three cases. Other reasons for abdominal pain were diagnosed by CT in 38 patients out of the remaining 74. There were two false positive and two false negative CT results, resulting in an overall accuracy of 95.6%. Multidetector CT angiography is a fast and accurate investigation for the diagnosis of acute mesenteric ischemia and in most cases can be used as the sole diagnostic procedure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Park WM, Gloviczki P, Cherry KJ et al (2002) Contemporary management of acute mesenteric ischemia: factors associated with survival. J Vasc Surg 35:445–452
McKinsey JM, Gewertz BL (1997) Acute mesenteric ischemia. In: Schwartz LB, Gewertz BL (eds) The surgical clinics of North America - mesenteric ischemia, 1st edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 307–318
Kirkpatrick ID, Kroeker MA, Greenberg HM (2003) Biphasic CT with mesenteric CT angiography in the evaluation of acute mesenteric ischemia: initial experience. Radiology 229:91–98
Edwards MS, Cherr GS, Craven TE et al (2003) Acute mesenteric ischemia: surgical management and outcomes. Ann Vasc Surg 17:72–79
Shih MC, Hagspiel KD (2007) CTA and MRA in mesenteric ischemia: part 1, role in diagnosis and differential diagnosis. AJR 188:452–461
Bassiouny HS (1997) Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia. In: Schwartz LB, Gewertz BL (eds) The surgical clinics of North America - mesenteric ischemia, 1st edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 319–326
Trompeter M, Brazda T, Remy CT, Vestring T, Riemer P (2002) Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia: etiology, diagnosis, and interventional therapy. Eur Radiol 12:1179–1187
Acosta S, Ogren M, Sternby NH, Bergqvist D, Bjorck M (2006) Fatal nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia: population-based incidence and risk factors. J Intern Med 259:305–313
Horton KM, Fishman EK (2002) Volume-rendered 3D CT of the mesenteric vasculature: normal anatomic variants and pathologic conditions. Radiographics 22:161–172
Horton KM, Fishman EK (2001) Multi-detector row CT of mesenteric ischemia: can it be done? Radiographics 21:1463–1473
Lee R, Tung HKS, Tung PHM, Cheung SCW, Chan FL (2003) CT in acute mesenteric ischemia. Clin Radiol 58:279–287
Hellinger JC (2004) Evaluating mesenteric ischemia with multidetector - row CT angiography. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 7(3):160–166
Fleischmann D (2003) Multiple detector-row CT angiography of the renal and mesenteric vessels. Eur J Radiol 45(Suppl 1):S79–S87
Sheedy SP, Earnest F, Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, Hoskin TL (2006) CT of small-bowel ischemia associated with obstruction in emergency department patients: diagnostic performance evaluation. Radiology 241(3):729–736
Acosta S, Ogren M, Sternby NH, Bergqvist D, Bjorck M (2005) Clinical implications for the management of acute thromboembolic occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery, autopsy findings in 213 patients. Ann Surg 241:516–522
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357(22):2277–2284 Nov 29
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ofer, A., Abadi, S., Nitecki, S. et al. Multidetector CT angiography in the evaluation of acute mesenteric ischemia. Eur Radiol 19, 24–30 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1124-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1124-5