Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantitative mapping of hepatic perfusion index using MR imaging: a potential reproducible tool for assessing tumour response to treatment with the antiangiogenic compound BIBF 1120, a potent triple angiokinase inhibitor

  • Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hepatic metastases are arterially supplied, resulting in an elevated hepatic perfusion index (HPI). The purpose of this study was to use dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging to quantify the HPI of metastases and the liver before and after treatment with a novel antiangiogenic drug. Ten patients with known metastatic liver disease underwent DCE-MR studies. HPIs of metastases and whole liver were derived using regions of interest (ROIs) and calculated on a pixel-by-pixel basis from quantified changes in gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) concentration. The HPI measurement error prior to treatment was derived by the Bland-Altman analysis. The median HPI before and after treatment with antiangiogenic drug BIBF 1120 were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Prior to treatment, the median HPI of metastases, 0.75 ± 0.14, was significantly higher than that of the whole liver, 0.66 ± 0.16 (p < 0.01). Bland-Altman reproducibility coefficients of the median HPI from metastases and whole liver were 13.0 and 5.1% respectively. The median HPI of metastases decreased significantly at 28 days after treatment with BIBF 1120 (p < 0.05). This pilot study demonstrates that HPI determined using quantified Gd-DTPA concentration is reproducible and may be useful for monitoring antiangiogenic treatment response of hepatic metastases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miles KA, Hayball MP, Dixon AK (1993) Functional images of hepatic perfusion obtained with dynamic CT. Radiology 188:405–411

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kissel A, Rixe O, Methlin A, Nabet M, Tranquart F, Rubini B, Jafaar S, Gaucher H (2001) Quantification of hepatic arterial and portal venous flow using ultrasound contrast agents for early detection of liver metastases of colorectal cancers. J Radiol 82:1621–1625

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fowler RC, Harris KM, Swift SE, Ward M, Greenwood DC (1998) Hepatic Doppler perfusion index: measurement in nine healthy volunteers. Radiology 209:867–871

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blomley MJ, Coulden R, Dawson P, Kormano M, Donlan P, Bufkin C, Lipton MJ (1995) Liver perfusion studied with ultrafast CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:424–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarper R, Fajman WA, Tarcan YA, Nixon DW (1981) Enhanced detection of metastatic liver disease by computerized flow scintigrams: concise communication. J Nucl Med 22:318–321

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leveson SH, Wiggins PA, Giles GR, Parkin A, Robinson PJ (1985) Deranged liver blood flow patterns in the detection of liver metastases. Br J Surg 72:128–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. White MJ, O’Gorman RL, Charles-Edwards EM, Kane PA, Karani JB, Leach MO, Totman JJ (2007) Parametric mapping of the hepatic perfusion index with gadolinium-enhanced volumetric MRI. Br J Radiol 80(950):113–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Totman JJ, O’Gorman RL, Kane PA, Karani JB (2005) Comparison of the hepatic perfusion index measured with gadolinium-enhanced volumetric MRI in controls and in patients with colorectal cancer. Br J Radiol 78:105–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mross K, Gmehling D, Frost A, Baas FJ, Strecker R, Hennig J, Strecker P, Stefanic M, Stehle G, Rossi Ld (2005) A clinical phase I pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic study of twice daily BIBF 1120 in advanced cancer patients. 41st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Orlando

  10. Hilberg F, Tontsch-Grunt U, Colbatzky F, Heckel A, Lotz R, van Meel JCA, Roth GJ (2004) BIBF 1120 - a novel, small molecule triple angiokinase inhibitor: profiling as a clinical candidate for cancer therapy. Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics, 16th EORTC-NCI-AACR Symposium, Geneva, Switzerland

  11. Pedersen M, Klarhofer M, Christensen S, Ouallet JC, Ostergaard L, Dousset V, Moonen C (2004) Quantitative cerebral perfusion using the PRESTO acquisition scheme. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:930–940. DOI 10.1002/jmri.20206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hittmair K, Gomiscek G, Langenberger K, Recht M, Imhof H, Kramer J (1994) Method for the quantitative assessment of contrast agent uptake in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 31:567–571

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Padhani AR (2002) Functional MRI for anticancer therapy assessment. Eur J Cancer 38:2116–2127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cuenod C, Leconte I, Siauve N, Resten A, Dromain C, Poulet B, Frouin F, Clement O, Friya G (2001) Early changes in liver perfusion caused by occult metastases in rats: detection with quantitative CT. Radiology 218(2):556–561

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Galbraith SM, Lodge MA, Taylor NJ, Rustin GJ, Bentzen S, Stirling JJ, Padhani AR (2002) Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in human muscle and tumours: comparison of quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis. NMR Biomed 15:132–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Meijerink MR, Cruijsen H, Hoekman K, Kater M, Schaik C, Waesberghe JHTM, Giaccone G, Manoliu RA (2007) The use of perfusion CT for the evaluation of therapy combining AZD2171 with gefitinib in cancer patients. Eur Radiol 17:1700–1713. DOI 10.1007/s00330–006–0425–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Cancer Research UK (C1060/A808/G7643) and EPSRC [GR/T20434/01 and GR/T20427/01(P)] for supporting this study and the MRI radiologist (Dr. A. Tang) and radiographers (J.J. Stirling and T. Wallace) involved for their help with the MRI examinations and patient care. The paper includes MRI trial data from a study sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keiko Miyazaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miyazaki, K., Collins, D.J., Walker-Samuel, S. et al. Quantitative mapping of hepatic perfusion index using MR imaging: a potential reproducible tool for assessing tumour response to treatment with the antiangiogenic compound BIBF 1120, a potent triple angiokinase inhibitor. Eur Radiol 18, 1414–1421 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0898-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0898-9

Keywords

Navigation