Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pain experience during internal spermatic vein embolization for varicocele: comparison of two cyanoacrylate glues

  • Interventional
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate possible pain sensation differences in patients after retrograde varicocele embolization either with n-butyl-(2)-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) or with n-butyl-(2)-cyanoacrylate + methacryloxysulfolane (NBCA-MS). Transcatheter varicocele embolization was performed in 64 consecutive patients (62 left, two bilateral). Embolization was done with NBCA (n=32) or NBCA-MS (n=32). Immediately after the procedure, patients were asked to evaluate pain during embolization using a visual analog scale (VAS). Statistical analysis was done with Student’s t test. Mean pain score on VAS was 3.23 (range: 0–8) for NBCA and 3.28 (range 0–9) for NBCA-MS. This difference was not significant (P=0.932). Independently of the type of glue, no difference in pain sensation (P value 0.421) was found between patients younger than 18 (n=29) and patients older than 18 years of age (n=35) (younger than18, mean 3.52; older than 18, mean 3.05). No difference in mean pain experience level (P=0.323) was seen in 11 patients with vessel wall perforation (23.4%) during the procedure (3.89; range: 0–8.5) in comparison with those without perforation (mean pain sensation level: 3.13; range: 0–9). No difference in pain experience was found after transcatheter varicocele embolization either with NBCA or NBCA-MS. Age and vessel wall perforation have no influence on pain sensation independently of the type of glue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tay KH, Martin ML, Mayer AL, Machan LS (2002) Selective spermatic venography and varicocele embolization in men with circumaortic left renal veins. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13:739–742

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cornud F, Belin X, Amar E, Delafontaine D, Helenon O, Moreau JF (1999) Varicocele: strategies in diagnosis and treatment. Eur Radiol 9:536–545

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kunnen M (1980) New techniques for embolization of the internal spermatic vein: intravenous tissue adhesive (author’s transl). RöFo 133:625–629

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kunnen M (1981) Non-surgical cure of varicocele by embolization with isobutyl-2-cyano-acrylate (author’s transl). Ann Radiol (Paris) 24:406–409

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Montanaro L, Arciola CR, Cenni E, Ciapetti G, Savioli F, Filippini F, Barsanti LA (2001) Cytotoxicity, blood compatibility and antimicrobial activity of two cyanoacrylate glues for surgical use. Biomaterials 22:59–66

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pollak JS, White RI Jr (2001) The use of cyanoacrylate adhesives in peripheral embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:907–913

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mutignani M, Tringali A, Khodadadian E, Petruzziello L, Spada C, Spera G, Familiari P, Costamagna G (2004) External pancreatic fistulas resistant to conventional endoscopic therapy: endoscopic closure with N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Glubran 2). Endoscopy 36:738–742

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Levrier O, Mekkaoui C, Rolland PH, Murphy K, Cabrol P, Moulin G, Bartoli JM, Raybaud C (2003) Efficacy and low vascular toxicity of embolization with radical versus anionic polymerization of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA). An experimental study in the swine. J Neuroradiol 30:95–102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sacks D, McClenny TE, Cardella JF, Lewis CA (2003) Society of interventional radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:S199–S202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marsman JW (1995) The aberrantly fed varicocele: frequency, venographic appearance, and results of Transcatheter embolization. Am J Roentgenol 164:649–657

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim BS, Do HM, Razavi M (2004) N-butyl cyanoacrylate glue embolization of splenic artery aneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:91–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rhodes DJ, Koshy RC, Waterfield WC, Wu AW, Grossman SA (2001) Feasibility of quantitative pain assessment in outpatient oncology practice. J Clin Oncol 19:501–508

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lenz M, Hof N, Kersting-Sommerhoff B, Bautz W (1996) Anatomic variants of the spermatic vein: importance for percutaneous sclerotherapy of idiopathic varicocele. Radiology 198:425–431

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaufman SL, Kadir S, Barth KH, Smyth JW, Walsh PC, White RI Jr (1983) Mechanisms of recurrent varicocele after balloon occlusion or surgical ligation of the internal spermatic vein. Radiology 147:435–440

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sam Heye.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heye, S., Maleux, G. & Wilms, G. Pain experience during internal spermatic vein embolization for varicocele: comparison of two cyanoacrylate glues. Eur Radiol 16, 132–136 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2840-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2840-8

Keywords

Navigation