Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of image quality of a standard and three dose-reducing protocols in adult cranial CT

  • Physics
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of various tube current settings (mAs) and optimize the image quality and dose for adult cranial CT protocol. Sixty adult patients who underwent a cranial CT scanning for different indications were subdivided into three subgroups. Subjective image and noise quality scores and quantitative noise measurements were selectively studied on three reference levels (cerebellar, basal ganglia and centrum semiovale levels). For each subgroup, only one level was studied. Head circumference (HC) and the maximum anteroposterior diameter (MAPD) of each patient were measured. At 50% decreased dose protocol, there was no poor quality score at any level. At nearly 60% decreased dose protocol, the incidence of poor quality scores was much higher at the cerebellar level than at the other two levels. For the same protocol number, quantitative noise measurements were higher at the cerebellar level than the other two supratentorial levels. The correlation was found to be significant between HC, MAPD and quantitative noise measurements, and there was a non-significant correlation between HC and subjective noise scores. In adult cranial CT, depending on the level, a dose reduction of up to 60% may be possible while maintaining image quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Unnik J, Broerse JJ, Geleijns J, Jansen JT, Zoetelief J, Zweers D (1997) Survey of CT techniques and absorbed dose in various Dutch hospitals. Br J Radiol 70:367–371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wade JP, Weyman JC, Goldstone KE (1997) CT standard protocols are of limited value in assessing actual patient dose. Br J Radiol 70:1146–1151

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wong ETH, Yu SK, Lai M, Wong YC, Lau PC (2000) MAPD—an objective way to select mAs for paediatric brain CT. Br J Radiol 74:932–937

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karabulut N, Toru M, Gelebek V, Gulsun M, Ariyurek OM (2002) Comparison of low-dose and standard-dose helical CT in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules. Eur Radiol 12:2764–2769

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilting JE, Zwartkruis A, van Leeuwen MS et al (2001) A rational approach to dose reduction in CT: individualized scan protocols. Eur Radiol 11:2627–2632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Verdun FR, Lepori D, Monnin P, Valley JF, Schnyder P, Gudinchet F (2004) Management of patient dose and image noise in routine pediatric CT abdominal examinations. Eur Radiol 14:835–8411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalra MK, Prasad S, Saini S et al (2002) Clinical comparison of standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT: effect on image quality. Am J Roentgenol 179:1101–1106

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohnen M, Fischer H, Hamacher J et al (2000) CT of the head by use of reduced current and kilovoltage: relationship between image quality and dose reduction. Am J Neuroradiol 21:1654–1660

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan CY, Wong YC, Chau LF, Yu SK, Lau PC (1999) Radiation dose reduction in paediatric cranial CT. Pediatr Radiol 29:770–775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nickoloff E (2002) Current adult and pediatric CT doses. Pediatr Radiol 32:250–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Takahashi M, Maguire WM, Ashtari M et al (1998) Low-dose spiral computed tomography of the thorax: comparison with the standard-dose technique. Invest Radiol 33:68–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marmolya G, Wiesen EJ, Yagan R, Haria CD, Shah AC (1991) Paranasal sinuses: low-dose CT. Radiology 181:689–691

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamel RI, Hemandez JR, Martin EJ et al (1994) Radiation dose reduction in CT of pediatric pelvis. Radiology 190:683–687

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zeman RK, Fox SH, Silverman PM, Davros WJ, Carter LM, Griego D (1993) Helical (spiral) CT of the abdomen. Am J Roentgenol 160:719–725

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fearon T (2002) CT dose parameters and their limitations. Pediatr Radiol 32:246–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Faculty, Department of Radiology, Zonguldak Karaelmas University, Kozlu, 67600, Zonguldak, Turkey

    Sadi Gündoğdu, Kamran Mahmutyazıcıoğlu, Hüseyin Özdemir, Ahmet Savranlar & Kıyasettin Asil

Authors
  1. Sadi Gündoğdu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kamran Mahmutyazıcıoğlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hüseyin Özdemir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmet Savranlar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kıyasettin Asil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamran Mahmutyazıcıoğlu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gündoğdu, S., Mahmutyazıcıoğlu, K., Özdemir, H. et al. Assessment of image quality of a standard and three dose-reducing protocols in adult cranial CT. Eur Radiol 15, 1959–1968 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2550-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2550-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation