Skip to main content
Log in

Lung MRI at 3.0 T: a comparison of helical CT and high-field MRI in the detection of diffuse lung disease

  • Magnetic Resonance
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of high-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lung using a T2-weighted fast-spin echo (TSE) sequence. Comparison was made with helical computed tomography CT findings in patients with diffuse pulmonary diseases. Prospective segment-wise analysis of high-field MR imaging findings in 15 patients with diffuse pulmonary diseases was made using helical CT and HRCT as the standard of reference. The MR studies were performed on a 3.0-T whole body system (Intera 3T, Philips Medical Systems) using a T2w TSE sequence with respiratory and cardiac gating (TE 80 ms TR 1,500–2,500 ms; turbo factor 17; 22 slices with 7/2-mm slice thickness and gap; 256×192 matrix). MR artifacts were graded on a three-point scale (low, moderate, high). Lung MR studies were prospectively analyzed segment-by-segment and diagnosed as healthy or pathological; results were compared with helical CT findings. In all 15 patients, MR imaging of the lung was successful. All 15 MR studies were compromised by artifacts; however, the severity of these artifacts was classified as low or moderate in 8/15, respectively, 7/15 cases. A total of 143/285 lung segments showed diffuse lung disease in helical CT. With MRI, 133 of these 143 segments (93%) were judged to be diseased. The ten segments that received false negative MR diagnoses displayed non-acute pulmonary lesions with inherently low proton density (scars, granulomas). MRI at 3.0 T can detect diffuse pulmonary disease with a high sensitivity. Based on this experience, further pulmonary studies with high-field systems appear justified and promising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leutner C, Schild H (2001) MRI of the lung parenchyma. RoFo 173:168–175

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergin CJ, Noll DC, Pauly JM, Glover GH, Macovski A (1992) MR imaging of lung parenchyma: a solution to susceptibility. Radiology 183:673–676

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Muller NL, Mayo JR, Zwirewich CV (1992) Value of MR imaging in the evaluation of chronic infiltrative lung diseases comparison with CT. Am J Roentgenol 158:1205–1209

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Leutner C, Gieseke J, Lutterbey G, Kuhl C, Glasmacher A, Wardelmann E, Theisen A, Schild H (2000) MR imaging of pneumonia in immuncompromised patients. Comparison with helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 175:391–397

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kauczor HU, Hanke A, Van Beek EJ (2002) Assessment of lung ventilation by MR imaging: current status and future perspectives. Eur Radiol 12(8):1962–1970

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Knopp M, Hess T, Schad L, Bischoff H, Weisser G, Blüml S, Van Kaick G (1994) MR tomography of lung metastases with rapid gradient echo sequences. Initial results in diagnostic applications. Radiologe 34:581–587

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mc Fadden RG, Carr TJ, Wood TE (1987) Proton magnetic resonance imaging to stage activity of interstitial lung disease. Chest 92:31–39

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haage P, Karaagac S, Adam G, Spuntrup E, Pfeffer J, Gunther RW (2002) Gadolinium containing contrast agents for pulmonary ventilation magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary results. Invest Radiol 37:120–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berthezene Y, Vexler V, Kuwatsuru R, Rosenau W, Muhler A, Clement O, Price DC, Brasch RC (1992) Differentiation of alveolitis and pulmonary fibrosis with a macromolecular MR imaging contrast agent. Radiology 185:97–103

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bader TR, Semelka RC, Pedro MS, Armao DM, Brown MA, Molina PL (2002) Magnetic resonance imaging of pulmonary parenchymal disease using a modified breath-hold 3D gradient-echo technique: initial observations. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:31–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kersjes W, Mayer, E, Buchenroth M, Schunk K, Fouda N, Cagil H (1997) Diagnosis of pulmonary metastases with turbo-SE MR imaging. Eur Radiol 7:1190–1194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lutterbey G, Gieseke J, Sommer T Keller E, Kuhl C, Schild H (1996) A new application of MR tomography of the lung using ultra-short turbo spin echo sequences RoFo 164:388–393

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lutterbey G, Leutner C, Gieseke J, Rodenburg J, Elevelt A, Sommer T, Schild H (1998) Detection of focal lung lesions with magnetic resonance tomography using T2-weighted ultrashort turbo-spin-echo-sequence in comparison with spiral computerized tomography. RoFo 169:365–369

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gieseke J, Lutterbey G, Schild HH, Elevelt A, Keller E, Sommer T, Kuhl C (1995) Magnetic resonance imaging of lung parenchyma with cardiac triggering and respiratory compensated ultra fast turbo spin echo. Abstract SMR/ESMRMB Joint Meeting 3:1613

    Google Scholar 

  15. Matsumoto S, Miyake H, Oga M, Takaki H, Mori H (1998) Diagnosis of lung cancer in a patient with pneumoconiosis and progressive massive fibrosis using MRI. Eur Radiol 8:615–617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Primack SL, Mayo JR, Hartmann TE, Miller, RR, Müller NL (1994) MRI of infiltrative lung disease: comparison with pathologic findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18:233–238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsumoto S, Mori H, Miyake H, Yamada Y, Ueda S, Oga M, Takeo H, Anan K (1998) MRI signal characteristics of progressive massive fibrosis in silicosis. Clin Radiol 53:510

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deffontaines C, Duhamel A (1991) Assessment of diffuse infiltrative lung disease: comparison of conventional CT and high-resolution CT. Radiology 181:157–162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Lutterbey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lutterbey, G., Gieseke, J., von Falkenhausen, M. et al. Lung MRI at 3.0 T: a comparison of helical CT and high-field MRI in the detection of diffuse lung disease. Eur Radiol 15, 324–328 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2548-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2548-1

Keywords

Navigation