Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Combined small and large bowel MR imaging in patients with Crohn’s disease: a feasibility study

  • Gastrointestinal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

MRI of the small bowel is a new method for the assessment of inflammatory bowel diseases. However, inflammatory bowel disease can affect both the small and large bowel. Therefore, our goal was to assess the feasibility of displaying the small bowel and colon simultaneously by MR imaging. Eighteen patients with inflammatory bowel disease were studied. For small bowel distension, patients ingested a solution containing mannitol and locust bean gum. Furthermore, the colon was rectally filled with water. MR examinations were performed on a 1.5-T system. Before and after intravenous gadolinium administration, a T1w data set was collected. All patients underwent conventional colonoscopy as a standard of reference. The oral ingestion and the rectal application of water allowed an assessment of the small bowel and colon in all patients. By means of MRI (endoscopy), 19 (13) inflamed bowel segments in the colon and terminal ileum were detected. Furthermore, eight additional inflammatory lesions in the jejunum and proximal ileum that had not been endoscopically accessible were found by MRI. The simultaneous display of the small and large bowel by MRI is feasible. Major advantages of the proposed MR concept are related to its non-invasive character as well as to the potential to visualize parts of the small bowel that cannot be reached by endoscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gore RM, Balthazar EJ, Ghahremani GG, Miller F (1996) CT features of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Am J Roentgenol 167:3–15

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Glickman RM (1991) Inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine, 12th edn. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 1268–1281

  3. Low RN, Sebrechts CP, Politoske DA, Bennett MT, Flores S, Snyder RJ, Pressman JH (2002) Crohn disease with endoscopic correlation: single-shot fast spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 222:652–660

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Debatin JF, Patak MA (1999) MRI of the small and large bowel. Eur Radiol 9:1523–1534

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Thoeni RF, Gould RG (1991) Enteroclysis and small bowel series: comparison of radiation dose and examination time. Radiology 178:659–662

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shoenut JP, Semelka RC, Magro CM, Silverman R, Yaffe CS, Micfli AB (1994) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopy in distinguishing the type and severity of inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 19:31–35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lubolt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, Debatin JF (1999) Contrast optimization for assessment of the colonic wall and lumen in MR colonography. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:745–750

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rieber A, Aschoff A, Nüssle K, Wruk D, Tomczak R, Reinshagen M, Adler G, Brambs H-J (2000) MRI in the diagnosis of small bowel disease: use of positive and negative oral contrast media in combination with enteroclysis. Eur Radiol 10:1377–1382

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, Umschaden M, Haselbach H (2000) Small bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 215:717–725

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Prassopoulos P (2002) MR enteroclysis: technical considerations and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 12:2651–2658

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schunk K, Metzmann U, Kersjes W, Schadmand-Fischer S, Kreitner KF, Duchmann R, Protzer U, Wanitschke R, Thelen M (1997) Follow-up of Crohn’s disease: can hydro-MRI replace fractionated gastrointestinal passage examination? Rofo Fortschr 166:389–396

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lauenstein TC, Schneemann H, Vogt FM, Herborn CU, Rühm SG, Debatin JF (2003) Optimization of oral contrast agents for MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiology 228:279–283

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maglinte DD, Lappas JC, Kelvin FM, Rex D, Chernish SM (1987) Small bowel radiography: how, when, and why? Radiology 163:297–305

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lomas DJ, Graves MJ (1999) Small bowel MRI using water as a contrast medium. Br J Radiol 72:994–997

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Minowa O, Ozaki Y, Kyogoku S, Shindoh N, Sumi Y, Katayama H (1999) MR imaging of the small bowel using water as a contrast agent in a preliminary study with healthy volunteers. Am J Roentgenol 173:581–582

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schunk K, Kern A, Oberholzer K, Kalden P, Mayer I, Orth T, Wanitschke R (2000) Hydro-MRI in Crohn’s disease: appraisal of disease activity. Invest Radiol 35:431–437

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Patak MA, Froehlich JM, von Weymarn C, Ritz MA, Zollikofer CL, Wentz K (2001) Non-invasive distention of the small bowel for the magnetic-resonance Imaging. Lancet 358:987–988

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Laghi A, Borrelli O, Paolantonio P, Dito L, Buena de Mesquita M, Falconieri P, Passariello R, Cucchiara S (2003) Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the terminal ileum with Crohn’s disease. Gut 52:393–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hansmann HJ, Hess T, Hahmann M, Erb G, Elsing C, Richter GM (2001) MRI in chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Rofo Fortschr 173:4–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Maccioni F, Viscido A, Broglia L, Marrollo M, Masciangelo R, Capri R, Rossi P (2000) Evaluation of Crohn’s disease with magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging 25:219–228

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikalis J, Papamastorakis G, Prassopoulos P, Roussomoustakaki M (2004) Assessment of Crohn’s disease activity in the small bowel with MR and conventional enteroclysis: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 14:1017–1024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmidt S, Lepori D, Meuwly J-Y, Duvoisin B, Meuli R, Michetti P, Felley C, Schnyder P, Melle G, Denys A (2003) Prospective comparison of MR enteroclysis with multidetector spiral-CT enteroclysis: interobserver agreement and sensitivity by means of “sign by sign” correlation. Eur Radiol 13:1303–1311

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG, Holtman G, Debatin JF (2002) MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology 223:248–254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Narin, B., Ajaj, W., Göhde, S. et al. Combined small and large bowel MR imaging in patients with Crohn’s disease: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 14, 1535–1542 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2364-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2364-7

Keywords

Navigation