Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of coronary artery stent patency by electron-beam CT

  • Cardiac
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following coronary angioplasty and stent implantation, restenosis remains common and its outcome difficult to predict. We set out to determine the diagnostic accuracy of electron-beam computed tomography (EBCT) for the non-invasive detection of stent obstruction. In a prospective, blinded investigation, we included 152 coronary artery segments in 117 patients treated with a stent implant. All segments were evaluated by a dynamic EBCT study that depicted contrast bolus passage distal to the stent and a CT angiographic study of the entire coronary arteries. It was found that delayed contrast enhancement in the distal segment correlated with angiographic stent obstruction (Spearman’s rank correlation, P=0.008), while all other indicators of stent occlusion did not correlate with angiographic diagnosis. However, direct comparison of patients with obstruction of less vs. more than 75% of luminal diameter did not yield any statistically significant differences of distal enhancement delay, and for the detection of >90% occlusion, the sensitivity was 72% at a specificity of 60%. Although delayed contrast enhancement distal to the stent upon EBCT did correlate with angiographical obstruction, the correlation did not suffice to appear clinically satisfactory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Nossen J, Daniel WG (1998) Value of electron-beam computed tomography for the noninvasive detection of high-grade coronary-artery stenoses and occlusions. N Engl J Med 339:1964–1971

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Erbel R, Haude M, Hopp HD et al (1998) Coronary artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. N Engl J Med 339:1672–1678

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ruygrok PN, Webster MWI, de Valk V et al (2002) Clinical and angiographic factors associated with asymptomatic restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 104:2289–2294

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Dirschinger J et al (2001) Restenosis after coronary placement of various stent types. Am J Cardiol 87:34–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pump H, Möhlenkamp S, Sehnert CA et al (2000) Coronary artery stent patency: assessment with electron-beam CT. Radiology 214:447–452

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu B, Dai R et al (2000) Detection and analysis of intracoronary artery stent after PTCA using contrast-enhanced three-dimensional electron-beam tomography. J Invasive Cardiol 12:1–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Möhlenkamp S, Pump H et al (1999) Minimally invasive evaluation of coronary stents with electron-beam computed tomography: in vivo and in vitro experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 48:39–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. TIMI Study Group (1985) The thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial. Phase I findings. N Engl J Med 312:932–936

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, Raaijmakers R, Pattynama PMT, de Feyter PJ (2002) Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 106:2051–2054

    Google Scholar 

  10. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Holle J, Muschiol G, Daniel WG, Moshage W (2000) In-plane coronary motion velocity: measurement with electron-beam CT. Radiology 216:457–463

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu B, Zhuang N, Mao S-S et al (2002) EKG-triggered CT data acquisition to reduce variability in coronary arterial calcium score. Radiology 224:838–844

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bateman TM, Gray RJ, Whiting JS et al (1986) Cine computed tomographic evaluation of aortocoronary bypass graft patency. J Am Coll Cardiol 8:693–698

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bateman TM, Gray RJ, Whiting JS et al (1987) Prospective evaluation of ultrafast cardiac computed tomography for determination of coronary bypass graft patency. Circulation 75:1018–1024

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stanford W, Brundage BH, MacMillan R et al (1988) Sensitivity and specificity of assessing coronary artery bypass patency with ultrafast computed tomography: results of a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol 12:1–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Weiss RM, Grover-McKay (1994) Assessment of coronary artery patency with cine computed tomography in a dog model of occlusion-reperfusion. Invest Radiol 29:168–171

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Nossen J, Bachmann K (1997) Noninvasive, three-dimensional visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts by electron beam tomography. Am J Cardiol 79:856–861

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pump H, Moehlenkamp S, Sehnert C et al (1998) Electron-beam CT in the noninvasive assessment of coronary stent patency. Acad Radiol 5:858–862

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmermund A, Haude M, Baumgart D et al (1996) Non-invasive assessment of coronary palmaz-schatz stents by contrast enhanced electron beam computed tomography. Eur Heart J 17:1546–1553

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Elezi S, Kastrati A, Neumann FJ, Hadamitzky M, Dirschinger J, Schömig A (1998) Vessel size and long-term outcome after coronary stent placement. Circulation 98:1875–1880

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sinitsyn V, Belkind M et al (2003) Relationships between coronary calcification detected at electron beam computed tomography and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty results in coronary artery disease patients. Eur Radiol 13:62–67

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (1999) ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:1756–1824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nikolaou K, Huber A et al (2002) Intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced electron-beam computed tomography and navigator-echo-based magnetic resonance imaging for noninvasive coronary artery angiography. Eur Radiol 12:1663–1671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krüger S, Mahnken AH et al (2003) Nultislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary stent restenosis and patency. Int J Cardiol 89:167–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maintz D, Juergens KU et al (2003) Imaging of coronary artery stents using multislice computed tomography: an in vitro evaluation. Eur Radiol 13:830–835

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Raaijmakers R, Pattynama P, de Feyter P (2003) Noninvasive angiographic evaluation of coronary stents with multi-slice spiral computed tomography. Herz 28:136–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Knollmann F, Pfoh A (2003) Coronary artery imaging with flat-panel computed tomography. Circulation 107:1209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Friedrich D. Knollmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knollmann, F.D., Möller, J., Gebert, A. et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent patency by electron-beam CT. Eur Radiol 14, 1341–1347 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2337-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2337-x

Keywords

Navigation