Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intrahepatic arterioportal shunting and anomalous venous drainage: understanding the CT features in the liver

  • Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increased use of high-contrast volume, arterial-phase studies of the liver has demonstrated the frequent occurrence of arterioportal shunts within both the cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic liver. This article sets out to explain the underlying microcirculatory mechanisms behind these commonly encountered altered perfusion states. Similarly, well-recognised portal perfusion defects occur around the perifalciform and perihilar liver and are largely caused by anomalous venous drainage via the paraumbilical and parabiliary venous systems. The underlying anatomy will be discussed and illustrated. These vascular anomalies are all caused by or result in diminished portal perfusion and are often manifest in the setting of portal venous thrombosis. The evolving concept of zonal re-perfusion following portal vein thrombosis will be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15 a,b
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23 a,b
Fig. 24 a–c

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCuskey RS (2000) Morphological mechanisms for regulating blood flow through hepatic sinusoids. Liver 20:3–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Quiroga S, Sebastià MC, Moreiras M, Pallisa E, Ruis JM, Alvarex-Castells A (1999) Intrahepatic arterioportal shunt: helical CT findings. Eur Radiol 9:1126–1130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Couinaud C (1988) The parabiliary venous system. Surg Radiol Anat 10:311–316

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin BF, Tudor RG (1980) The umbilical and paraumbilical veins of man. J Anat 130:305–322

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamagami T, Arai Y, Matsueda K, Inaba Y, Sueyoshi S, Takeuchi Y (1999) The cause of non tumourous defects of portal perfusion in the hepatic hilum revealed by CT during arterial portography. Am J Roentgenol 172:397–402

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Itai Y, Matsui O (1999) “Non portal” splanchnic venous supply to the liver: abnormal findings on CT, US and MRI. Eur Radiol 9:237–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Kuroiura T et al (2001) Unusual haemodynamics and pseudolesions of the noncirrhotic liver at CT. Radiographics 21:S81–S96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Itai Y, Murata S, Saida Y, Minami M (1994) Central zone and peripheral zone of the liver based on portal and hepatic arterial blood supply; imaging approach to deformity of cirrhotic liver (Japanese). J Clin Radiol 39:1553–1559

    Google Scholar 

  9. Minami M, Itai Y, Tanaka YO, Akahane M, Kiryu S, Ohtomo K (2002) Zonal differentiation of the liver: peripheral vs central zones (abstract). Radiology 225:486–487

    Google Scholar 

  10. Itai Y, Moss AA, Goldbery HI (1982) Transient hepatic attenuation difference of lobar or segmental distribution detected by dynamic computed tomography. Radiology 144:835–839

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saegusa M, Watanabe K, Okudaira M, Ishii K, Shibata H (1991) A study on microvascular alteration in the experimental rat liver cirrhosis—with special reference on the significance of the hepatic artery in the pseudolobular formation. Acta Hepatologica Japonica 32:708–716

    Google Scholar 

  12. Madoff DC, Hicks ME, Vauthey J et al (2002) Transhepatic portal vein embolization: anatomy, indications, and technical considerations. Radiographics 22:1063–1076

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. LaFortune M, Coustantin A, Breton G, Legarc AG, Lavoie P (1985) The recanalized umbilical vein in portal hypertension: a myth. Am J Roentgenol 144:549–553

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kobayashi S, Matsui O, Gabata T (2001) Pseudolesion in segment IV of the liver adjacent to the falciform ligament caused by drainage of the paraumbilical vein: demonstration by power Doppler ultrasound. Br J Radiol 74:273–276

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshikawa J, Matsui O, Takashima T et al (1987) Focal fatty change of the liver adjacent to the falciform ligament: CT and sonographic findings in five surgically confirmed cases. Am J Roentgenol 149:491–494

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hashimoto M, Heianna J, Tate E, Nishii T, Iwama T, Ishiyama K (2002) Small veins entering the liver. Eur Radiol 12:2000–2005

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Soyer P, Devine N, Somveille E, Rebibo G, Rambert C, Scherrer A (1996) Hepatic pseudolesion around the falciform ligament: prevalence on CT examination. Abdom Imaging 21:324–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Kaneko K et al (1997) Anatomy and clinical importance of cholecystic venous drainage: helical CT observations during injection of contrast medium into the cholecystic artery. Am J Roentgenol 169:505–510

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamauchi H, Miyagawa K, Satoh S (1984) Venous drainage of the gallbladder vein with reference to spread of carcinoma of the gallbladder. J Biliary Tract Panc 5:341–347

    Google Scholar 

  20. Matsui O, Takahashi S, Kadoya M et al (1994) Pseudolesion in segment IV of the liver at CT during arterial portography: correlation with aberrant gastric venous drainage. Radiology 193:31–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoon K-H, Matsui O, Kadoya M, Yoshigawa J, Gabata T, Arai K (1999) Pseudolesion in segments II and III of the liver on CT during arterial portography caused by aberrant right gastric venous drainage. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:306–309

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kawamori Y, Matsui O, Takahashi S, Kadoya M, Takashima T, Miyayama S (1996) Focal hepatic fatty infiltration in the posterior edge of the medial segment associated with aberrant gastric venous drainage: CT, US and MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:356–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nakayama T, Yoshimitsu K, Masuda K (2000) Pseudolesion in segment IV of the liver with focal fatty deposition caused by the parabiliary venous drainage. Comput Med Imaging Graph 24:259–263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Battaglia DM, Wanless IR, Brady AP, Mackenzie RL (1995) Intrahepatic sequestered segment of liver presenting as focal fatty change. Am J Gastroenterol 90:2238–2239

    Google Scholar 

  25. Matsui O, Kadoya M, Takahashi S et al (1995) Focal sparing of segment IV in fatty livers shown by sonography and CT: correlation with aberrant gastric venous drainage. Am J Roentgenol 164:1137–1140

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Dr H. Millward-Sadler (Consultant Histopathologist) with the preparation of the histology illustrations for this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Breen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Breen, D.J., Rutherford, E.E., Stedman, B. et al. Intrahepatic arterioportal shunting and anomalous venous drainage: understanding the CT features in the liver. Eur Radiol 14, 2249–2260 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2334-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2334-0

Keywords

Navigation