Skip to main content
Log in

Dose and image quality in the comparison of analogue and digital techniques in paediatric urology examinations

  • Pediatric
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In paediatric radiology it has been recognised that children have a higher risk of developing cancer from the irradiation than adults (two to three times); therefore, increased attention has been directed towards the dose to the patient. In this study the effect on patient dose and image quality in replacing the exposure in micturating cystourethrography (MCUG) examinations with the stored fluoroscopy image has been investigated. In the intravenous urography (IVU) examination we compared analogue and digital image quality, but the dose measurements were performed on a phantom. Standard clinical X-ray equipment was used. Sixty-eight patients in each of two centres were studied for the MCUG. Doses were measured with a dose-area product (DAP) meter and the image quality was scored. A non-parametric statistical analysis was performed. For the IVU, a phantom was used in the dose measurements but clinical images were scored in the comparison between analogue and digital images. For the MCUG, replacing the exposure with stored fluoroscopy images lowered the DAP value from 0.77 to 0.50 Gy cm2. The image quality did not show any difference between the techniques; however, if reflux was to be graded, exposure was needed. For the IVU, the doses could be lowered by a factor of 3 using digital techniques. The image quality showed no statistical difference between the two techniques. There is a potential for a substantial dose reduction in both MUCG and IVU examinations using digital techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fendel H, Schneider K, Kohn MM, Bakowski C (1989) Specific principles for optimization in image quality and patient exposure in paediatric diagnostic imaging. BIR Rep 20:91–101

    Google Scholar 

  2. European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Diagnostic Radiograpic Images in Paediatrics (1996) EUR 16261 EN, Luxembourg, ISBN 92-827-7843-6

  3. ICRP 60 (1991) Recommendations of the International Commission of Radiological Protection. Pergamon Press, Oxford

  4. Hallén S, Martling K, Mattsson S (1992) Dosimetry at X-ray examinations of scoliosis. Radiat Prot Dosim 43:49–54

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gallini RE, Belletti S, Berna V, Guigni U (1992) Adult and child doses in standardised X-ray examinations. Radiat Prot Dosim 43:41–49

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schneider K, Fendel H, Bakowski C, Stein E, Kohn M, Kellner M, Schweighofer K, Cartagena G, Padovani R, Panzer W, Scheurer C, Wall B (1992) Results of a dosimetric study in the European community on frequent X-ray examinations in infants. Radiat Prot Dosim 43:31–36

    Google Scholar 

  7. Almén A (1995) Radiation dose to children in diagnostic radiology. Measurements and methods for clinical optimisation studies. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Radiation Physics, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden

  8. Reuter FG, Conway BJ, McCrohan JL, Slayton RJ, Suleiman OH (1992) Assessment of skin entrance kerma in the United States: the nationwide evaluation of X ray trends (NEXT). Radiat Prot Dosim 43:71–73

    Google Scholar 

  9. Supe SJ, Iyer PS, Sasane JB, Sawant SG, Shirva VK (1992) Estimation and significance of patient doses from diagnostic X ray practises in India. Radiat Prot Dosim 43:209–211

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Maruyama T, Kumamoto Y, Noda Y, Iwai K, Mase N, Nishizawa K, Furuya Y (1992) Determinations of organ or tissue doses and collective effective dose equivalent from diagnostic X-ray examinations in Japan. Radiat Prot Dosim 43:213–216

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nicholson RA, Thornton A, Akpan M (1995) Radiation dose reduction in paediatric fluoroscopy using added filtration. Br J Radiol 68:296–300

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gonzalez L, Vano E, Ruiz MJ (1995) Radiation doses to paediatric patients undergoing micturating cystourethrography examinations and potential reduction by radiation protection optimization. Br J Radiol 68:291–295

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hansson B, Finnbogason T, Schuwert P, Persliden J (1997) Added copper filtration in pediatric double-contrast colon examinations: effects on radiation dose and image. Eur Radiol 7:1117–1122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Persliden J, Petterson HBL, Fälth-Magnusson K (1996) Radiation dose at small intestinal biopsies in children: results of a national study. Acta Paediatr 85:1042–1046

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Geijer H, Verdonck B, Beckman KW, Andersson T, Persliden J (2003) Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: radiation dose optimisation. Eur Radiol 13:543–551

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Persliden J, Beckman KW, Geijer H, Andersson T (2002) Dose-image optimisation in digital radiology with a direct digital detector: an example applied to pelvic examinations. Eur Radiol 12:1584–1588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Almen A, Mattsson S (1995) The radiation dose to children from X-ray examinations of the pelvis and the urinary tract. Br J Radiol 68:604–613

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith T, Gordon I, Kelly JP (1998) Comparison of radiation dose from intravenous urography and99Tcm-DMSA scintigraphy in children. Br J Radiol 71:314–319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vestergren E (1998) Administered radiopharmaceutical activity and radiation dosimetry in paediatric nuclear medicine. Thesis, Department of Radiation Physics, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden, ISBN 91-628-2951-3

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was founded by The FORSS Foundation contract no. F96–134.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Persliden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Persliden, J., Helmrot, E., Hjort, P. et al. Dose and image quality in the comparison of analogue and digital techniques in paediatric urology examinations. Eur Radiol 14, 638–644 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2144-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2144-9

Keywords

Navigation