Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ultrathin needle (25 G) aspiration lung biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication rates

  • Chest
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and complication rate of 25-G fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the lung in patients with suspected malignant focal lesions and abnormal lung function. The 25-G FNAB was performed in 123 patients who underwent prebiopsy CT and pulmonary function tests. Retrospective evaluation included pulmonary function, cytology, size of the lesion, depth of location, presence of emphysema on CT, needle passes, pneumothorax and drainage. The final diagnosis (gold standard) was based on histopathology after surgical resection or follow-up and response to treatment. Sixty-one patients had normal lung function or mild impairment (group 1) and 62 had moderate or severe impairment (group 2). Pneumothorax occurred in 26 of 126 procedures (20.6%) with drainage needed in 11 (8.7%). In group 2 pneumothorax occurred in 19 of 63 procedures (30.15%) with drainage needed in 11 (17.5%). The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of cytology results were 93.6, 100 and 94.4%, respectively. FEV1 (p=0.014), FEV1/FVC (p=0.005), FEF25—75 (p=0.001), DLCO (p=0.013) and presence of emphysema on CT (p<0.001) correlated with pneumothorax (Student’s t test). The 25-G lung FNAB is accurate and safe in diagnosing malignancy in patients with severe lung functional abnormality. Patients with moderate to severe airway obstruction have a higher prevalence of pneumothorax than patients with mild or no functional impairment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1a–c
Fig. 2a, b

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dennie CJ, Matzinger FR, Marriner JR, Maziak DE (2001) Transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung: results of early discharge in 506 outpatients. Radiology 219:247

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Klein JS, Salomon G, Stewart EA (1996) Transthoracic needle biopsy with a coaxially placed 20-gauge automated cutting needle: results in 122 patients. Radiology 198:715

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kazerooni EA, Hartker FW III, Whyte RI, Martinez FJ, Lynch J (1996) Transthoracic needle aspiration in patients with severe emphysema. A study of lung transplant candidates. Chest 109:616

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fish GD, Stanley JH, Miller KS, Schabel SI, Sutherland SE (1988) Postbiopsy pneumothorax: estimating the risk by chest radiography and pulmonary function tests. AJR 150:71

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Quon D, Fong TC, Mellor J, Brandschwei FH, Desautels JE (1988) Pulmonary function testing in predicting complications from percutaneous lung biopsy. Can Assoc Radiol J 39:267

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller KS, Fish GB, Stanley JH, Schabel SI (1988) Prediction of pneumothorax rate in percutaneous needle aspiration of the lung. Chest 93:742

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia-Rio F, Pino JC, Casadevall J, Gomez L, Atienza JM, Diaz-Lobato S, Vllamor J (1996) Use of spirometry to predict risk of pneumothorax in CT-guided needle biopsy of the lung. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20:20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Connor S, Dyer J, Guest P (2000) Image-guided needle biopsy of 106 thoracic lesions: retrospective review of diagnostic accuracy and complication rates. Eur Radiol 10:490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wain JC (1993) Video-assisted thoracoscopy and the staging of lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 56:776

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. American Thoracic Society (1991) Lung function testing: selection of reference values and interpretive strategies. Am Rev Respir Dis 144:1202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Clore F, Virapongse C, Saterfiel J (1989) Low-risk large-needle biopsy of chest lesions. Chest 96:538

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Arakawa H, Nakajima Y, Kurihara Y, Niimi H, Ishikawa T (1996) CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy: a comparison between automated biopsy gun and fine-needle aspiration. Clin Radiol 51:503

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boiselle PM, Shepard JA, Mark EJ, Szyfelbein WM, Fan CM, Slanetz PJ, Trotman-Dickenson B, Halpern EF, Miller SW, McLoud TC (1997) Routine addition of an automated biopsy device to fine-needle aspiration of the lung: a prospective assessment. AJR 169:661

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zavala DC, Schoell JE (1981) Ultrathin needle aspiration of the lung in infectious and malignant disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 123:125

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stanley JH, Fish GD, Andriole JG, Gobien RP, Betsill WL, Laden SA, Schabel SI (1987) Lung lesions: cytologic diagnosis by fine-needle biopsy. Radiology 162:389

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kazerooni EA, Lim FT, Mikhail A, Martinez FJ (1996) Risk of pneumothorax in CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of the lung. Radiology 198:371

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Khouri NF, Stitik FP, Erozan YS, Gupta PK, Kim WS, Scott WW Jr, Hamper UM, Mann RB, Eggleston JC, Baker RR (1985) Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of benign and malignant lung lesions. AJR 144:281

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Westcott JL (1980) Direct percutaneous needle aspiration of localized pulmonary lesions: result in 422 patients. Radiology 137:31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Austin JH, Cohen MB (1993) Value of having a cytopathologist present during percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of lung: report of 55 cancer patients and metaanalysis of the literature. Am J Roentgenol 160:175

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sinner WN (1976) Complications of percutaneous transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 17:813

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nahman BJ, Van Aman ME, McLemore WE, O’Toole RV (1985) Use of the Rotex needle in percutaneous biopsy of pulmonary malignancy. AJR 145:97

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Perlmutt LM, Braun SD, Newman GE, Oke EJ, Dunnick NR (1986) Timing of chest film follow-up after transthoracic needle aspiration. AJR 146:1049

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Moore EH, Shepard JA, McLoud TC, Templeton PA, Kosiuk JP (1990) Positional precautions in needle aspiration lung biopsy. Radiology 175:733

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Anderson CL, Crespo JC, Lie TH (1994) Risk of pneumothorax not increased by obstructive lung disease in percutaneous needle biopsy. Chest 105:1705

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stevens GM, Jackman RJ (1984) Outpatient needle biopsy of the lung: its safety and utility. Radiology 151:301

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Swischuk JL, Castaneda F, Patel JC, Li R, Fraser KW, Brady TM, Bertino RE (1998) Percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of the lung: review of 612 lesions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9:347

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hill PC, Spagnolo SV, Hockstein MJ (1993) Pneumothorax with fine-needle aspiration of thoracic lesions. Is spirometry a predictor? Chest 104:1017

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cox JE, Chiles C, McManus CM, Aquino SL, Choplin RH (1999) Transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy: variables that affect risk of pneumothorax. Radiology 212:165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Poe RH, Kallay MC, Wicks CM, Odoroff CL (1984) Predicting risk of pneumothorax in needle biopsy of the lung. Chest 85:232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. St. Louis EL, Hyland R, Gray RR, Hutcheon M, Jones D, Grosman H (1984) Percutaneous needle biopsy of lung lesions. Chest 86:940

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fraser RS, Muller NL, Collman N, Pare PD (1999) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In: Fraser and Pare’s diagnosis of diseases of the chest, 4th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, p 2229

  32. Schaefer-Prokop C, Prokop M, Fleischman D, Herold C (2001) High-resolution CT of diffuse interstitial lung disease: key findings in common disorders. Eur Radiol 11:373

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Anastasia Oikonomou

    Present address: Department of Radiology, Democrition University of Thrace, Dragana, 68100, Alexandroupolis, Greece

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, The Ottawa Hospital, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y4E9, Canada

    Anastasia Oikonomou, Frederick R. Matzinger, Jean M. Seely & Carole J. Dennie

  2. Department of Respirology, The Ottawa Hospital, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y4E9, Canada

    Peter J. Macleod

Authors
  1. Anastasia Oikonomou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frederick R. Matzinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jean M. Seely
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carole J. Dennie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peter J. Macleod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anastasia Oikonomou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oikonomou, A., Matzinger, F.R., Seely, J.M. et al. Ultrathin needle (25 G) aspiration lung biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complication rates. Eur Radiol 14, 375–382 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2076-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2076-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation