Skip to main content
Log in

Thoracic aortic stent graft: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and CT angiography in the follow-up: initial results

  • Vascular–Interventional
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The objective of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) and multislice computed tomographic angiography (MS CTA) in the follow-up of thoracic stent-graft placement. The CE MRA and MS CTA were performed following nitinol stent-graft treatment due to thoracic aneurysm (n=4), intramural bleeding (n=2) and type-B aortic dissection (n=5). Corresponding evaluation of arterial-phase imaging characteristics focused on the stent-graft morphology and leakage assessment. Stent-graft and aneurysm extensions were comparable between both techniques. Complete exclusion (aneurysm, n=4; dissection, n=2) was assessed with high confidence with CE MRA and MS CTA. Incomplete exclusion (intramural bleeding, n=2; dissection, n=3) was assigned to lower confidence scores on CE MRA compared with MS CTA. On CE MRA the stent-graft lumen demonstrated an inhomogeneous signal, the stent struts could not be assessed. The CE MRA can be used as alternative non-invasive imaging for follow-up of nitinol stent grafts. Arterial-phase leak assessment can be less evident in CE MRA compared with MS CTA studies; therefore, the use of late-phase imaging seems to be necessary. The diagnostic gap of stent-graft fracture evaluation using MRA may be filled with plain radiographs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1. a
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nienaber CA, Fattori R, Lund G et al. (1999) Nonsurgical reconstruction of thoracic aortic dissection by stent-graft placement. N Engl J Med 340:1539–1545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Armerding MD, Rubin GD, Beaulieu CF et al. (2000) Aortic aneurysmal disease: assessment of stent-graft treatment: CT versus conventional angiography. Radiology 215:138–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kato N, Dake MD, Miller DC et al. (1997) Traumatic thoracic aortic aneurysm: treatment with endovascular stent-grafts. Radiology 205:657–662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grabenwöger M, Hutschala D, Ehrlich MP et al. (2000) Thoracic aortic aneurysms: treatment with endovascular self-expandable stent grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 69:441–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thurnher SA, Grabenwoger M (2002) Endovascular treatment of thoracic aneurysms: a review. Eur Radiol 12:1370–1387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sakai T, Dake MD, Semba CP et al. (1999) Descending thoracic aortic aneuryms: thoracic CT findings after endovascular stent-graft placement. Radiology 212:169–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mita T, Arita T, Matsunaga N et al. (2000) Complications of endovascular repair for thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysm: an imaging spectrum. Radiographics 20:1263–1278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maspes F, Gandini R, Pocek M et al. (1999) Breath-hold gadolinium enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography: personal experience in the thoracic-abdominal area. Radiol Med 98:275–282

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hilfiker PR, Quick HH, Pfammatter T et al. (1999) Three-dimensional MR angiography of a nitinol-based abdominal aortic stent graft: assessment of heating and imaging characteristics. Eur Radiol 9:1775–1780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hilfiker PR, Quick HH, Schmidt M et al. (1999) In vitro image characteristics of an abdominal aortic stent graft: CTA versus 3D MRA. MAGMA 8:27–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Engellau L, Larrson EM, Albrechtsson U et al. (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging and MR angiography of endoluminal treated abdominal aortic aneuryms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 15:212–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lenhart M, Volk M, Manke C et al. (2000) Stent appearance at contrast-enhanced MR angiography: in vivo examination with 14 stents. Radiology 217:173–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Maintz D, Kugel H, Schellhammer F et al. (2001) In vitro evaluation of intravascular stent artifacts in three-dimensional MR angiography. Invest Radiol 36:218–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hansmann HJ, Kampschulte A, Schumacher H et al. (2001) Rational radiologic after-care of endoluminal aortic bypass. Radiologe 41:674–680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Balm R, Kaatee R, Blankensteijn JD et al. (1996) CT-angiography of abdominal aortic aneurysms after transfemoral endovascular aneurysm management. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 12:182–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chavan A, Cohnert TU, Heine J et al. (2000) Endoluminal grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms: experience with the Talent endoluminal stent graft. Eur Radiol 10:636–641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Engellau L, Olsrud J, Brockstedt S et al. (2000) MR evaluation ex vivo and in vivo of a covered stent-graft for abdominal aortic aneurysms: ferromagnetism, heating, artifacts and velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:112–121

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Golzarian J, Dussaussois L, Abada HT et al. (1998) Helical CT of aorta after endoluminal stent-graft therapy: value of biphasic acquisition. Am J Roentgenol 171:329–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefanie Weigel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weigel, S., Tombach, B., Maintz, D. et al. Thoracic aortic stent graft: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and CT angiography in the follow-up: initial results. Eur Radiol 13, 1628–1634 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-1832-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-1832-9

Keywords

Navigation