Abstract.
Mammography is the only useful examination in screening for breast cancer. Mortality from breast cancer can be reduced if women go regularly for a screening mammography. Moreover, it is still the key examination in diagnosis of breast diseases and in the follow-up of patients treated for breast cancer. Pain with mammography can deter women from going for regular screening or follow-up; therefore, it is important to reduce pain experience or discomfort from mammography. In this study we evaluate the impact of the "radiographer" on the pain risk during mammography by analysing questionnaires filled in by women and radiographers. Study results reveal that the opinion of the radiographer, the information and communication during the examination and the number of years of experience are important factors in pain and discomfort experience. The attitude of the radiographer plays an important role in the pain experience.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tabar L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A, Baldetorp L, Holmberg LH, Grontoft O, Ljungquist U, Lundstrom B, Manson JC, Eklund G et al. (1985) Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1:829–832
Scheiden R, Sand J, Tanous AM, Capesius C, Wagener C, Wagnon Knolle U, Faverly D (2001) Consequences of a National Screening Program on diagnostic procedures and tumor sizes in breast cancer. A retrospective study of 1540 cases diagnosed and histologically confirmed between 1995 and 1997. Pathol Res Pract 197:467–474
Van Dam P, Van Goethem M, Kersschot E, Vervliet J, Van Den Veyver I, De Schepper A, Buytaert P (1988) Palpable solid breast masses: retrospective single- and multimodality evaluation of 201 lesions. Radiology 166:435–439
Rojas MP, Telaro E, Russo A, Fossatir R, Confalonieri C, Liberati A (2000) Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD001768
Nielsen BB et al. (1991) Pain and discomfort associated with film-screen mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 83:1754–1756
Rutter DR, Calnan M, Vaille MS, Field S, Wade KA (1992) Discomfort and pain during mammography: description, prediction and prevention. Br Med J 305:443–445
Leaney BJ, Martin M (1992) Breast pain associated with mammographic compression. Australas Radiol 36:120–123
Keefe FJ, Hauck ER, Egert J, Rimer B, Kornguth P (1994) Mammography pain and discomfort: a cognitive-behavioral perspective. Pain 56:247–260
Dullum JR, Lewis EC, Mayer JA (2000) Rates and correlates of discomfort associated with mammography. Radiology 214:547–552
Stomper PC et al. (1988) Is mammography painful? A multicentre patient survey. Arch Intern Med 148:521–524
Keemers-Gels ME, Groenendijk RP, van den Heuvel JH, Boetes C, Peer PG, Wobbes TH (2000) Pain experience by women attending breast cancer screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat 60:235–240
Andrews FJ (2001) Pain during mammography: implications for breast screening programmes. Australas Radiol 45:113–117
Elwood M, McNoe B, Smith T, Bandaranayake M, Doyle TC (1998) Once is enough: why some women do not continue to participate in a breast cancer screening programme. N Z Med J 22 111:180–183
Aro AR, Absetz-Ylostalo P, Eerola T, Pamilo M, Lonnqvist J (1996) Pain and discomfort during mammography. Eur J Cancer 32A:1674–1679
Scaf-Klomp W, Van Sonderen E, Van Den Heuvel W (1997) Compliance after 17 years of breast cancer screening. Factors associated with reattendance for periodic breast screening. Eur J Public Health:182–187
Scaf-Klomp W (1997) Screening for breast cancer. Attendance and psychological consequences. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, p 142
Fallowfield LJ, Rodway A, Baum M (1990) What are the psychological factors influencing attendance, non-attendance and re-attendance at a breast screening centre? J R Soc Med 83:547–551
Aro AR, De Koning HJ, Absetz P, Schreck M (1999) Psychological predictors of first attendance for organised mammography screening. J Med Screen 6:82–88
Eklund GW, Gardenosa G (1991) Art of positioning needs revival in mammography. Diagn Imaging (San Franc) 13:131–140
Eklund GW, Gardenosa G (1992) The art of mammographic positioning. Radiol Clin North Am 30:21–53
Bakker DA, Lightfoot NE, Steggles S, Jackson C (1998) The experience and satisfaction of women attending breast cancer screening. Oncol Nurs Forum 25:115–121
Loken K, Steine S, Laerum E (1998) Mammography: influence of departmental practice and women's characteristics on patient satisfaction: comparison of six departments in Norway. Qual Health Care 7:136–14
Bruyninckx E, Mortelmans D, Van Goethem M, Van Hove E (1999) Risk factors of pain in mammographic screening. Soc Sci Med 49:933–941
Sjolin M, Maerker M (1994) Effects of information on and reflection of women's pain experience during mammography. Vard Nord Utveckl Forsk 14:11–15
Cawson J, Billson V, Russel I (1993) Mammographic follow-up: a vital component of breast cancer management. Aust N Z J Surg 63:551–553
Kornguth PJ, Rimer BK, Conaway MR, Sullivan DC, Catoe KE, Stout AL, Brackett JS (1993) Impact of patient-controlled compression on the mammography experience. Radiology 186:99–102
Kashikar-Zuck S, Keefe FJ, Kornguth P, Beaupre P, Holzberg A, Delong D (1997) Pain coping and the pain experience during mammography: a preliminary study. Pain 73:165–172
Agresti A (1990) Categorical data analysis. Wiley, New York, p 558
Kaufman R (1996) Comparing effects in dichotomous logistic regression: a variety of standardized coefficients. Soc Sci Q 1:90–109
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goethem, M.V., Mortelmans, D., Bruyninckx, E. et al. Influence of the radiographer on the pain felt during mammography. Eur Radiol 13, 2384–2389 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-002-1686-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-002-1686-6