Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maximizing early treatment with biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the ultimate breakthrough in joints preservation

  • Review
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic, progressive inflammatory disease that, if left untreated, can lead to irreversible joint damage and serious disability. In Central and Eastern Europe, RA treatment varies widely, partly due to economic factors, restrictive treatment guidelines, and access to practicing rheumatologists. The recent treatment paradigm shift of treating to target in RA with early, aggressive therapy has proven to be a successful strategy for achieving optimal clinical outcomes. Several clinical studies demonstrate that utilizing this strategy with anti-tumor necrosis factor biologics leads to improved clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes. Patient education is also a critical component of the treating to target strategy, and the patient’s version of the treat-to-target recommendations is an important tool for successful implementation. This review discusses the evidence for the treat-to-target approach and describes areas to improve the disparity of treatment between patients in Western European compared with Central and Eastern European countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feldmann M, Brennan FM, Maini RN (1996) Rheumatoid arthritis. Cell 85:307–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Choy EH, Panayi GS (2001) Cytokine pathways and joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med 344:907–916

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Smolen JS, Landewe R, Breedveld FC et al (2010) EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis 69:964–975

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kvien TK (2004) Epidemiology and burden of illness of rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacoeconomics 22:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Callahan LF, Pincus T (1995) Mortality in the rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Care Res 8:229–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gabriel SE (2001) The epidemiology of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 27:269–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ware JE, Snow K, Kosinski M, Gandek B (1993) SF-36® health survey: manual and interpretation guide. QualityMetric Inc, Lincoln, RI

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ware JE Jr (2000) SF-36 health survey update. Spine 25:3130–3139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ware JE, Kosinski M et al (2001) SF-36® physical & mental health summary scales: a manual for users of version 1. QualityMetric Inc, Lincoln, RI

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chu EM, Chiu KY, Wong RW et al (2004) Translation and validation of Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 into Chinese: CAIMS2. Arthritis Rheum 51:20–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bugajska J, Brzosko M et al (2010) Psychological stress in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a comparative Polish-German study. Autoimmun Rev 9:211–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Larsen A, Thoen J (1987) Hand radiography of 200 patients with rheumatoid arthritis repeated after an interval of one year. Scand J Rheumatol 16:395–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yelin E, Henke C, Epstein W (1987) The work dynamics of the person with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 30:507–512

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sokka T, Kautianinen H, Pincus T et al (2009) Disparities in rheumatoid arthritis disease activity according to gross domestic product in 25 countries in the QUEST–RA database. Ann Rheum Dis 68:1666–1672

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Orlewska E, Ancuta I, Anic B et al (2011) Access to biologic treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries. Med Sci Monit 17:SR1–SR13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jonsson B, Kobelt G, Smolen J (2008) The burden of rheumatoid arthritis and access to treatment: uptake of new therapies. Eur J Health Econ 8:S61–S86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Resman-Targoff BH, Cicero MP (2010) Aggressive treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis: recognizing the window of opportunity and treating to target goals. Am J Manag Care 16:S249–S258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. National Health Insurance House (2007) Order number 221: approving the protocol of practice for prescribing, monitoring, and settlement of drugs for rheumatoid arthritis for insured persons in the social health insurance system. Official Gazette 366

  19. Emery P, Salmon M (1995) Early rheumatoid arthritis: time to aim for remission? Ann Rheum Dis 54:944–947

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Smolen J, Aletaha D, Koeller M et al (2007) New therapies for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 370:1861–1874

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Finckh A, Liang MH, van Herckenrode CM, de Pablo P (2006) Long-term impact of early treatment on radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis. Arthritis Rheum 55:864–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Emery P, Breedveld FC, van der Heijde D et al (2010) Two-year clinical and radiographic results with combination etanercept-methotrexate therapy versus monotherapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: a two-year, double-blind, randomized study. Arthritis Rheum 62:674–682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Aletaha D, Smolen J, Ward MM (2006) Measuring function in rheumatoid arthritis: identifying reversible and irreversible components. Arthritis Rheum 54:2784–2792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rantalaiho V, Korpela M, Hannonen P et al (2009) The good initial response to therapy with a combination of traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs is sustained over time: the eleven-year results of the Finnish rheumatoid arthritis combination therapy trial. Arthritis Rheum 60:1222–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Puolakka K, Kautiainen H, Mottonen T et al (2005) FIN-RACo Trial Group. Early suppression of disease activity is essential for maintenance of work capacity in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis: five-year experience from the FIN-RACo trial. Arthritis Rheum 52:36–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JWJ et al (2010) Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis 69:631–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Massardo L, Suarez-Almazor ME, Cardiel MH (2009) Management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Latin America: a consensus position paper from Pan-American League of Associations of Rheumatology and Grupo Latino Americano De Estudio De Artritis Reumatoide. J Clin Rheumatol 15:203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sukhpreet, Agarwal V, Tiwari P (2007) Treatment and monitoring costs in rheumatoid arthritis: preliminary results from an Indian setting. Indian J Pharm Sci 69:226–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Combe B, Landewe R, Lukas C et al (2007) EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis: report of a task force of the European Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Ann Rheum Dis 66:34–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mader R, Keystone E (2007) Optimizing treatment with biologics. J Rheumatol 34:16–24

    Google Scholar 

  31. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) (2002) Guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 46:328–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kosinski M, Kukawski SC, Martin R et al (2002) Health-related quality of life in early rheumatoid arthritis: impact of disease and treatment response. Am J Manag Care 8:231–240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Prevoo ML, van’t Hof MA, Kuper HH et al (1995) Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 38:44–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Fransen J, van Riel PL et al (2005) The disease activity score and the EULAR response criteria. Clin Exp Rheumatol 23:S93–S99

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Aletaha D, Landewe R, Karonitsch T et al (2008) Reporting disease activity in clinical trials of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: EULAR/ACR collaborative recommendations. Ann Rheum Dis 67:1360–1364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bruce B, Fries JF (2003) The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: a review of its history, issues, progress, and documentation. J Rheumatol 30:167–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cheung K, Oemar M, Oppe M, Rabin R (2009) EuroQOL User Guide v2.0. http://www.euroqol.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Documenten/PDF/User_Guide_v2_March_2009.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2010

  38. Greiner W, Weijnen T, Niuwenhuizen M et al (2003) A single European currency for EQ-5D health states. Results from a six-country study. Eur J Health Econ 4:222–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. de Wit MP, Smolen JS, Gossec L et al (2011) Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: the patient version of the international recommendations. Ann Rheum Dis 70:891–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Goekoop-Ruiterman YP, de Vries-Bouwstra JK, Allaart CF et al (2005) Clinical and radiographic outcomes of four different treatment strategies in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (the BeSt study). Arthritis Rheum 52:3381–3390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Klarenbeek NB, Koevoets R, van der Heijde DM et al (2011) Association with joint damage and physical functioning of nine composite indices and the 2011 ACR/EULAR remission criteria in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 70:1815–1821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Bejerano V, Quinn M, Conaghan PG et al (2008) Effect of the early use of the anti-tumor necrosis factor adalimumab on the prevention of job loss in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 59:1467–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Darmawan J (2007) Recommendations from the Community Oriented Program for Control of Rheumatic Disease for data collection for the measurement and monitoring of health in developing countries. Clin Rheumatol 26:853–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Anis A, Zhang W, Emery P et al (2009) The effect of etanercept on work productivity in patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis: results from the COMET study. Rheumatology 48:1283–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mogosan C, Stoica V, Mihai C et al (2010) Trends of rheumatoid arthritis monitorization in Romania. J Med Life 3:330–337

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Editorial/medical writing support was provided by WC Hatch at ACUMED and was funded by Pfizer Inc. No financial support was provided to the authors for this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andra Balanescu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balanescu, A., Wiland, P. Maximizing early treatment with biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the ultimate breakthrough in joints preservation. Rheumatol Int 33, 1379–1386 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-012-2629-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-012-2629-4

Keywords

Navigation