Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of phonophoresis and iontophoresis in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To define the role of phonophoresis and iontophoresis of corticosteroids in conjunction with wrist splint use in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) compared to wrist splint use alone, 52 CTS subjects were analyzed based on clinical and electrophysiological criteria. A prospective, randomized controlled trial was carried out to assess symptom severity, motor skills, and hand function according to the Boston Symptom Severity Scale (BSSS), grip strength, and nine-hole peg test (NHPT), respectively, on the initial visit and in the 3rd month after treatment. The patients underwent conservative interventions randomly as follows: (1) 3 weeks of phonophoresis with betamethasone in conjunction with wrist splint use (group I, n: 18) or (2) 3 weeks of iontophoresis with betamethasone in conjunction with wrist splint use (group II, n: 16) or (3) wrist splint use alone (control, group III, n: 18). The mean age of the patients was 43.7 ± 8.4 (range 24–57) years. Groups I, II, and III showed a significant and further improvement in BSSS at the 3rd month evaluations compared with baseline (P < 0.001, P = 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively), but no significant change was observed in grip strength or NHPT (P > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the phonophoresis and control groups after treatment only regarding BSSS, in favor of phonophoresis (P = 0.012). We recommend the use of wrist splints especially with phonophoresis for relief of symptoms in patients with CTS. Our results demonstrated no superiority among the treatment groups. Further, transdermal steroid treatments are not key determinants of efficacy with respect to motor skills and hand dexterity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I (1999) Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 282:153–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dawson DM, Hallet M, Millender LH (1990) Carpal tunnel syndrome. Entrapment neuropathies. In: Dawson DM, Hallet M, Millender LH (eds) Little Brown, Boston. pp 25–92

  3. Werner RA, Andary M (2002) Carpal tunnel syndrome: pathophysiology and clinical neurophysiology. Clin Neurophysiol 113:1373–1381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kanaan N, Sawaya RA (2001) Carpal tunnel syndrome: modern diagnostic and management techniques. Br J Gen Pract 51:311–314

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Scholten RJ, de Krom MC, Bertelsmann FW, Bouter LM (1997) Variation in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 20:1334–1335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hayward AC, Bradley MJ, Burke FD (2002) Primary care referral protocol for carpal tunnel syndrome. Postgrad Med J 78:149–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mitragotri S, Farrell J, Tang H, Terahara T, Kost J, Langer R (2000) Determination of threshold energy dose for ultrasound-induced transdermal drug transport. J Control Release 63:41–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Marshall S, Tardif G, Ashworth N (2007) Local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD001554

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mitragotri S, Blankschtein D, Langer R (1997) An explanation for the variation of the sonophoretic transdermal transport enhancement from drug to drug. J Pharm Sci 86:1190–1192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Costello CT, Jeske AH (1995) Iontophoresis: applications in transdermal medication delivery. Phys Ther 75:554–563

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dakowicz A, Latosiewicz R (2005) The value of iontophoresis combined with ultrasound in patients with the carpal tunnel syndrome. Rocz Akad Med Bialymst 50:196–198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pottenger FJ (1989) Utilization of hydrocortisone phonophoresis in United States army physical therapy clinics. Mil Med 54:355–358

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gokoglu F, Fndkoglu G, Yorgancoglu ZR, Okumus M, Ceceli E, Kocaoglu S (2005) Evaluation of iontophoresis and local corticosteroid injection in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 84:92–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aygul R, Ulvi H, Karatay S, Deniz O, Varoglu AO (2005) Determination of sensitive electrophysiologic parameters at follow-up of different steroid treatments of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Clin Neurophysiol 22:222–230

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oh SJ (1993) Normal values for common nerve conduction tests. Clinical electromyography, Nerve conduction studies. In: Oh SJ (ed) Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 84–105

  16. Oh SJ (1993) Nerve conduction in focal neuropathies. Clinical electromyography, nerve conduction studies. In: Oh SJ (ed) Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 496–575

  17. Sezgin M, Incel NA, Serhan S, Camdeviren H, As I, Erdogan C (2006) Assessment of symptom severity and functional status in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: reliability and functionality of the Turkish version of the Boston questionnaire. Disabil Rehabil 28:1281–1285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tredgett MW, Davis TR (2000) Rapid repeat testing of grip strength for detection of faked hand weakness. J Hand Surg 25:372–375

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bechtol CO (1954) Grip test: the use of a dynamometer with adjustable handle spacings. J Bone Joint Surg Am 36:820–824

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, Volland G (1985) Adult norms for the nine hole peg test of finger dexterity. Occup Ther J Res 5:24–38

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cameron MH, Monroe LG (1992) Relative transmission of ultrasound by media customarily used for phonophoresis. Phys Ther 72:142–148

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Saraf SK, Singh OP (2005) Management of chronic hemophilic synovitis in children by phonophoresis. Indian J Orthop 39:47–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Glass JM, Stephen RL, Jacobson SC (1980) The quantity and distribution of radiolabeled dexamethasone delivered to tissue by iontophoresis. Int J Dermatol 19:519–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Demmink JH, Helders PJM, Hobaek H, Enwemeka C (2003) The variation of heating depth with therapeutic ultrasound frequency in physiotherapy. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:113–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Singh P, Maibach HI (1994) Iontophoresis in drug delivery: basic principles and applications. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 11:161–213

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Singh P, Roberts MS (1994) Deep tissue penetration of bases and steroids after dermal application in rat. J Pharm Pharmacol 46:956–964

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Singh P, Roberts MS (1994) Skin permeability and local tissue concentrations nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs after topical application. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 268:144–151

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Karatay S, Aygul R, Melikoglu MA, Yildirim K, Ugur M, Erdal A, Akkus S, Senel K (2009) The comparison of phonophoresis, iontophoresis and local steroid injection in carpal tunnel syndrome treatment. Joint Bone Spine 76:719–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Baysal O, Altay Z, Ozcan C, Ertem K, Yologlu S, Kayhan A (2006) Comparison of three conservative treatment protocols in carpal tunnel syndrome. Int J Clin Pract 60:820–828

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mishra S, Prabhakar S, Lal V, Modi M, Das CP, Khurana D (2006) Efficacy of splinting and oral steroids in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized clinical and electrophysiological study. Neurol India 54:286–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Ministry of Health Ankara Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital, P.O. Box 06010, Ankara, Turkey

    Eda Gurcay, Ece Unlu, Reyhan Tuncay & Aytul Cakci

  2. Department of Neurosurgery, Ministry of Health Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

    Ahmet Gurhan Gurcay

Authors
  1. Eda Gurcay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ece Unlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmet Gurhan Gurcay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Reyhan Tuncay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aytul Cakci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eda Gurcay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gurcay, E., Unlu, E., Gurcay, A.G. et al. Assessment of phonophoresis and iontophoresis in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Rheumatol Int 32, 717–722 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-010-1706-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-010-1706-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation