Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relationship between the severity of enthesitis and clinical and laboratory parameters in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the relationship between the severity of enthesitis and outcome of measurement indices, clinical and laboratory parameters in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Thirty-three patients who fulfilled the modified New York criteria for AS were included in this study. Patients were asked to record the severity of current pain, night pain and morning stiffness on a 10-cm visual analogue scale. Stoke Enthesitis Index (SEI) was used to measure the severity of enthesitis. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) were calculated. SEI was correlated positively only with BASDAI (= 0.370, = 0.034). There was no relation between SEI and laboratory parameters (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C Reactive Protein). Our data suggest that using an enthesitis index such as SEI can be a valuable tool in the evaluation of disease activity in patients with AS. However, evaluation of enthesitis severity is based on information given by patient and should be combined with objective parameters such as spinal measurements when assessing disease activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Calin A (1989) Ankylosing spondylitis. In: Kelley WN, Haris ED (eds) Textbook of rheumatology, 3rd edn. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1021–1037

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heuft-Dorenbosch L, Spoorenberg A, van Tubergen A, Landewe R et al (2003) Assessment of enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 62(2):127–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Benjamin M, McGonagle D (2001) The anatomical basis for disease localisation in seronegative spondylarthropathy at entheses and related sites. J Anat 199:503–526

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Drouart M, Saas P, Billot M et al (2003) High serum vascular endothelial growth factor correlates with disease activity of spondylarthropathies. Clin Exp Immunol 132(1):158–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D’Agostino MA, Said-Nahal R, Hacquard-Bouder C et al (2003) Assessment of peripheral enthesitis in the spondylarthropathies by ultrasonography combined with power Doppler: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Rheum 48(2):523–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McGonagle D, Marzo-Ortega H, O’Connor P et al (2002) The role of biomechanical factors and HLA-B27 in magnetic resonance imaging-determined bone changes in plantar fascia enthesopathy. Arthritis Rheum 46(2):489–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mander M, Simpson JM, McLellan A et al (1987) Studies with an enthesitis index as a method of clinical assessment in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 46:197–202

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Davis JC Jr (2005) Ankylosing spondylitis. In: Koopman WJ, Moreland LW (eds) Arthritis and allied conditions. A textbook of rheumatology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1319–1334

  9. Garret S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy L et al (1994) A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 21:2286–2291

    Google Scholar 

  10. Calin A, Garret S, Whitelock H, Kennedy LG et al (1994) A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index. J Rheumatol 21(12):2281–2285

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jenkinson TR, Mallorie PA, Whitelock HC et al (1994) Defining spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The bath AS metrology index. J Rheumatol 21(9):1694–1698

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Karatepe AG, Akkoc Y, Akar S, Kirazlı Y, Akkoc N (2005) The Turkish versions of the bath ankylosing spondylitis and Dougados functional indices: reliability and validity. Rheumatol Int 25(8):612–618. Epub 2004 Jul 10

    Google Scholar 

  13. Akkoc Y, Karatepe AG, Akar S, Kirazlı Y, Akkoc N (2005) A Turkish version of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index: reliability and validity. Rheumatol Int 25(4):280–284. Epub 2004 Jan 17

    Google Scholar 

  14. Averns HL, Oxtoby J, Taylor HG, Jones PW et al (1996) Radiological outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: use of the stoke ankylosing spondylitis spine score(SASSS). Br J Rheumatol 35:373–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dawes PT, Sheeran TP, Beswick EJ, Hothersall TE (1987) Enthesopathy index in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 46:717

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Balint PV, Kane D, Wilson H et al (2002) Ultrasonography of enthesal insertions in the lower limb in spondylarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis 61(10):905–910

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yildirim K, Erdal A, Karatay S et al (2004) Relationship between some acute phase reactants and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis. South Med J 97(4):350–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor HG, Wardle T, Beswick EJ et al (1991) The relationship of clinical and laboratory measurements to radiological change in ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Rheumatol 30(5):330–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Spoorenberg A, van der Heijde D, de Klerk E, Dougados M et al (1999) Relative value of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein in assessment of disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 26(4):980–984

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Laurent MR, Panayi GS (1983) Acute-phase proteins and serum immunoglobulins in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 42:524–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sheenan NJ, Slavin BM, Donovan MP, Mount JN, Mathews JA (1986) Lack of correlation between clinical disease activity and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, acute phase protein or protease inhibitors in ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Rheumatol 25:171–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. van Tubergen A, van der Heijde D, Anderson J et al (2003) Comparison of statistically derived ASAS improvement criteria for ankylosing spondylitis with clinically relevant improvement according to an expert panel. Ann Rheum Dis 62(3):215–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, Whitelock H et al (1994) A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spodylitis Disease Activity Index. J Rheumatol 21(12):2286–2291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Spoorenber A, van Tubergen A, Landewe R, Dougados M, van der Linden S, Mielants H, van de Tempel H, van der Heijde D (2005) Measuring disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis: patient and physician have different perspectives. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44:789–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Heuft-Dorenbosch L, van Tubergen A, Spoorenberg A, Landewe R, Dougados M, Mielants H, van der Tempel H, van der Heijde D (2004) The influence of peripheral arthritis on disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis patients as measured with the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index. Arthritis Rheum 51(2):154–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taciser Kaya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaya, T., Bal, S. & Gunaydin, R. Relationship between the severity of enthesitis and clinical and laboratory parameters in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int 27, 323–327 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-006-0218-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-006-0218-0

Keywords

Navigation