Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analgesic and disease modifying effects of interferential current in psoriatic arthritis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interferential current (IFC) was suggested to improve the skin manifestations of psoriasis vulgaris, possibly by enhancing the intracellular concentration of cyclic AMP. We assessed the efficacy of IFC on psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Nine consecutive patients were analyzed at baseline and after 16 weeks of IFC therapy. Bipolar IFC was applied twice daily to hands, feet plus all affected joints. IFC improved SF-36 assessed body pain, but not other SF-36 subscales. Morning stiffness, tender joint counts, and physician assessed disease activity improved. In contrast, visual analogue scale assessed pain, CRP and ESR measurements were unchanged. MRI of the most affected hand or foot documented a tendency towards worsened tendinitis, soft tissue swelling, and new joint space narrowing and erosions. Bone scintigraphy showed a trend towards deterioration. New joints became inflamed within treated sites. Thus IFC has analgesic effects in PsA, but does not have a satisfactory disease modifying effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mease PJ, Goffe BS, Metz J, VanderStoep A, Finck B, Burge DJ (2000) Etanercept in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: a randomised trial. Lancet 356:385–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Philipp A, Wolf GK, Rzany B, Dertinger H, Jung EG (2000) Interferential current is effective in palmar psoriaris: an open prospective trial. Eur J Dermatol 10:195–198

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sontag W (2000) Modulation of cytokine production by interferential current in differentiated HL-60 cells. Bioelectromagnetics 21:238–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sontag W (2004) Response of cyclic AMP by DMSO differentiated HL-60 cells exposed to electric interferential current after prestimulation. Bioelectromagnetics 25:176–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Royer E, Chaintreul J, Meynadier J, Michel B, Guilhou JJ, Crastes DP (1982) Cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP production in normal and psoriatic epidermis. Dermatologica 165:533–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Asadullah K, Sabat R, Friedrich M, Volk HD, Sterry W (2004) Interleukin-10: an important immunoregulatory cytokine with major impact on psoriasis. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy 3:185–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Platzer C, Meisel C, Vogt K, Platzer M, Volk HD (1995) Up-regulation of monocytic IL-10 by tumor necrosis factor-alpha and cAMP elevating drugs. Int Immunol 7:517–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sontag W, Dertinger H (1998) Response of cytosolic calcium, cyclic AMP, and cyclic GMP in dimethylsulfoxide-differentiated HL-60 cells to modulated low frequency electric currents. Bioelectromagnetics 19:452–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moll JM, Wright V (1973) Psoriatic arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 3:55–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wassenberg S, Fischer-Kahle V, Herborn G, Rau R (2001) A method to score radiographic change in psoriatic arthritis. Z Rheumatol 60:156–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Clegg DO, Reda DJ, Mejias E, Cannon GW, Weisman MH, Taylor T, Budiman-Mak E, Blackburn WD, Vasey FB, Mahowald ML, Cush JJ, Schumacher HR Jr, Silverman SL, Alepa FP, Luggen ME, Cohen MR, Makkena R, Haakenson CM, Ward RH, Manaster BJ, Anderson RJ, Ward JR, Henderson WG (1996) Comparison of sulfasalazine and placebo in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. A Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. Arthritis Rheum 39:2013–2020

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheing GL, Hui-Chan CW (2003) Analgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential currents on heat pain in healthy subjects. J Rehabil Med 35:15–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson MI, Tabasam G (2003) An investigation into the analgesic effects of different frequencies of the amplitude-modulated wave of interferential current therapy on cold-induced pain in normal subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:1387–1394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McInnes IB, Illei GG, Danning CL, Yarboro CH, Crane M, Kuroiwa T, Schlimgen R, Lee E, Foster B, Flemming D, Prussin C, Fleisher TA, Boumpas DT (2001) IL-10 improves skin disease and modulates endothelial activation and leukocyte effector function in patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Immunol 167:4075–4082

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank the Nemectron GmbH, Daimlerstr. 15, 76185 Karlsruhe, Germany for providing the IFC appliance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. A. Walker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walker, U.A., Uhl, M., Weiner, S.M. et al. Analgesic and disease modifying effects of interferential current in psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatol Int 26, 904–907 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-006-0102-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-006-0102-y

Keywords

Navigation