Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Prevalence of low central bone mineral density in a bulgarian female referral population: a pilot study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Osteoporosis is one of the most important health problems among elderly women. The prevalence of central osteoporosis in Bulgaria is still unknown. We tried to retrospectively determine the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis at the spine and hip in a female referral population. Bulgarian women (2,600) aged group 25–87 years referred for bone densitometry screening were included. Information about known risk factors for low bone mass was recorded. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (Hologic QDR 4500 A) at the lumbar spine (2,547 participants, 1,954 of whom were postmenopausal) and left hip (723 participants, 605 of whom were postmenopausal). T-scores were calculated from Hologic-provided and own Bulgarian peak BMD data (the latter based on 122 healthy premenopausal 25- to 39-year-old women). Peak lumbar spine BMD was 0.994 g/cm2 (SD 0.095 g/cm2), and thus lower than the manufacturer-provided value of 1.047 g/cm2. The peak BMD of the total hip was 0.959 g/cm2 (SD 0.129 g/cm2) and thus higher than the manufacturer-provided BMD of 0.942. T-scores differed according to the database used. The osteoporosis threshold of −2.5 SD was reached at the spine in the age group 70–74 years. Left hip T-scores showed a much slower decline with age. In women aged 50 and older the prevalence of osteoporosis reached 37.31% at the spine, and 16.14% at the left hip. Osteopenia was found in 39.74% at the spine and in 65.57% at the total hip. This is the first Bulgarian study looking for the prevalence of central osteoporosis in a female referral population. It may become the starting point for future epidemiological work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Odén A, Sernbo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Petterson C, De Laet C, Jönsson B (2004) Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 15:38–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kanis JA, Odén A, Johnell O, De Laet C, Jönsson B (2004) Excess mortality after hospitalization for vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:108–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Odén A, Sernbo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Petterson C, De Laet C, Jönsson B (2004) Fracture risk following an osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:175–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jensen AL, Harder I (2004) The osteoporotic pain experience. Osteoporos Int 15:204–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barrett-Connor E (1995) The economic and human costs of osteoporotic fracture. Am J Med 98(Suppl 2A):3S–8S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Düppe H, Gärdsell P, Nilsson B, Johnell O (1997) A single bone density measurement can predict fractures over 25 years. Calcif Tissue Int 60:171–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312:1254–1259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cauley JA, Zmuda JM, Wisniewski SR, Krishnaswami S, Palermo L, Stone KL, Black DM, Nevitt MC (2004) Bone mineral density and prevalent vertebral fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 15:32–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schuit SCE, Van der Klift M, Weel A, De Laet C, Burger H, Seeman E et al (2004) Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam study. Bone 34:195–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. The WHO Study Group (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. In: Report of a WHO Study Group, WHO Technical Report Series 843, Geneva: World Health Organization

  11. Leib ES, Lewiecki EM, Binkley N, Hamdy RC (2004) Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. J Clin Densitom 7:1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boyanov M, Popivanov P (2002) Prevalence of low forearm bone density in a Bulgarian female referral population. Osteoporos Int 13:288–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. National Statistical Institute (2003) Health Care data. In: National Statistical Report 2003, National Statistical Institute, Sofia, pp 15–23

  14. Hologic (1996) QDR 4500 X-ray bone densitometer user’s guide. Hologic, Bedford

    Google Scholar 

  15. The Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference (2004) Technical standardization for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Clin Densitom 7:27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hologic (1998) Hologic Reference database. Hologic, Bedford

    Google Scholar 

  17. Glüer CC, Blake G, Lu Y, Blunt BA, Jergas M, Genant HK (1995) Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 5:262–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bonnick SL (2004) Effect of scoliosis, osteoarthritis, osteophytes, surgery, and fracture on BMD in the proximal femur. In: Bonnick SL (ed) (2004) Bone densitometry in clinical practice. Humana Press, Totowa, p 54

    Google Scholar 

  19. Melton LJ III (1995) How many women have osteoporosis now? J Bone Miner Res 10:175–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Arlot ME, Sorney-Rendu E, Garnero P, Vey-Marty B, Delmas PD (1997) Apparent pre- and postmenopausal bone loss evaluated by DXA at different skeletal sites in women: the OFELY cohort. J Bone Miner Res 12:683–690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Looker A, Orwoll ES, Johnston CC Jr et al (1997) Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 12:1761–1768

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tenenhouse A, Joseph L, Kreiger N et al (2000) Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Osteoporos Int 11:897–904

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Liao EY, Wu XP, Deng XG et al (2002) Age-related bone mineral density, accumulated bone loss rate and prevalence of osteoporosis at multiple skeletal sites in Chinese women. Osteoporos Int 13:669–676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gürlek A, Bayraktar M, Ariyürek M (2000) Inappropriate reference range for peak bone mineral density in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: implications for interpretation of T-scores. Osteoporos Int 11:809–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu XP, Liao EY, Huang G, Dai RC, Zhang H (2003) A comparison study of the reference curves at different skeletal sites in native Chinese, Japanese, and American Caucasian women. Calcif Tissue Int 73:122–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Aoki TT, Grecu EO, Srinivas PR, Prescott P, Benbarka M, Arcangeli MM (2000) Prevalence of osteoporosis in women: variation with skeletal site of measurement of bone mineral density. Endocr Pract 6:127–131

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Deng HW, Li JL, Li J, Davies KM, Recker RR (1998) Heterogeneity of bone mineral density across skeletal sites and its clinical implications. J Clin Densitom 1:339–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Faulkner KG (1998) Bone densitometry: choosing the proper skeletal site to measure. J Clin Densitom 1:279–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Melton LJ III, Khosla S, Atkinson EJ, O’Connor MK, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL (2000) Cross-sectional versus longitudinal evaluation of bone loss in men and women. Osteoporos Int 11:592–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Miller PD (2000) Controversies in bone mineral diagnostic classifications. Calcif Tissue Int 66:317–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank DXA technologists Darina Antonova and Violeta Djambasova (Endocrinology Clinic, Medical University of Sofia, Bulgaria) for their hard and devoted work in completing this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Endocrinology Clinic, Alexandrovska Hospital, Medical University of Sofia, 1, G. Sofiiski str, Sofia, 1431, Bulgaria

    Mihail A. Boyanov

Authors
  1. Mihail A. Boyanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mihail A. Boyanov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyanov, M.A. Prevalence of low central bone mineral density in a bulgarian female referral population: a pilot study. Rheumatol Int 26, 523–529 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-005-0015-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-005-0015-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation