Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The prevalence of joint hypermobility among high school students

  • Original article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of joint hypermobility among high school students and to define the characteristics of patients with joint hypermobility.

Methods

The students underwent complete history and physical examination. In order to designate marfanoid habitus, body weight, height, and span/height and upper/lower segment ratios were recorded. The degree of joint hypermobility was scored by the Beighton scoring system. The following features were also examined: arthralgia, myalgia, low back pain, sciatica, spinal deformities, temporomandibular joint pain and crepitus, effusion, swan neck deformity, arachnodactyly, joint dislocation, joint sprain, Raynaud’s phenomenon, stria, varicose veins, abdominal and inguinal hernia, heart disease history, myopia, dropping eyelids, and antimongoloid slant.

Results

Eight hundred sixty-one students (433 females and 428 males) with a mean age of 15.4±1.1 years (range 13–19) were examined. Joint hypermobility was observed in 101 (11.7%) of the students. According to the Beighton scoring system, the majority of these (61.4%) were observed to score 4. Our results show that phenotype has no relation with joint mobility. Of the total number of students, there were 31 male (7.2%) and 70 female (16.2%) hypermobile subjects. The difference between sexes was highly significant (P=0.00005). Joint sprain was detected in 14 of hypermobile students (13.9%) and 50 of nonhypermobile students (6.6%). Its presence was the only significant parameter between hypermobile and nonhypermobile students (P=0.0094).

Conclusions

Joint hypermobility was found in 11.7% of the students in our study, and the results are in harmony with the previous studies on Western populations. Although hypermobility does not seem to be very problematic in young people, as in our focus group, we believe that it is important for physicians to recognize this problem to ensure correct diagnosis and treatment, since it may lead to mimic rheumatic diseases in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grahame R (1990) The hypermobility syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 49:190–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beighton P, Solomon L, Soskolne CL (1973) Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis 32:413–418

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Grahame R (1978) Hypermobility in healthy subjects. In: Scott JT (ed) Copeman’s textbook of rheumatic diseases. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 635–637

  4. Al-Rawl ZS, Al-Aszawi AJ, Al-Chababi T (1985) Joint mobility among university students in Iraq. Br J Rheumatol 24:326–331

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grahame R (2000) The revised (Brighton 1998) criteria for the diagnosis of benign joint hypermobility syndrome (BJHS). J Rheumatol 27:1177–1178

    Google Scholar 

  6. Biro F, Gewanter HL, Baum J (1983) The hypermobility syndrome. Pediatrics 72:701–706

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gedalia A, Person DA, Brewer EJ Jr, Giannini EH (1985) Hypermobility of the joints in juvenile episodic arthritis/arthralgia. J Pediatr 107:873–876

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nijs J, Van Essche E, De Munck M, Dequeker J (2000) Ultrasonographic, axial, and peripheral measurements in female patients with benign hypermobility syndrome. Calcif Tissue Int 67:37–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Resnick D (2002) Additional congenital or heritable anomalies and syndromes. In: Resnick D (ed) Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 4561–4631

  10. Grahame R (1994) Hypermobility syndrome. In: Klippel JH Dieppe PA (eds) Rheumatology. Mosby, London, pp 18.1–6

  11. Bridges AJ, Smith E, Reid J (1992) Joint hypermobility in adults referred to rheumatology clinics. Ann Rheum Dis 51:793–796

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Murray KJ, Woo P (2001) Benign joint hypermobility in childhood. Rheumatology 40:489–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Misra MB, Ryan P, Atkinson P, Taylor H, Bell J, Calver D, Fogelman I, Child A, Jackson G, Chambers JB, Grahame R (1996) Extra-articular features of benign joint hypermobility syndrome. Br J Rheumatol 35:861–866

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lewkonina RM, Ansell BM (1983) Articular hypermobility simulating chronic rheumatic disease. Arch Dis Child 58:988–992

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nicolas JA (1970) Injuries to knee ligaments: relationship to looseness and tightness in football players. JAMA 212:2236–2239

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Dr. Reha Alpar from the Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, for planning this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ümit Seçkin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seçkin, Ü., Tur, B.S., Yılmaz, Ö. et al. The prevalence of joint hypermobility among high school students. Rheumatol Int 25, 260–263 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-003-0434-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-003-0434-9

Keywords

Navigation