Skip to main content
Log in

Brucellosis of the spine: evaluation of the clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings of 14 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to assess the clinical, laboratory and radiological findings of vertebral involvement in brucellosis. Fourteen patients diagnosed with spondylitis and spondylodiscitis due to brucellosis were included in the study. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or scintigraphy were used to diagnose the vertebral involvement. The control group consisted of 20 patients with brucellosis but no vertebral involvement. The clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings of both groups were compared. The prevalence of vertebra involvement in brucellosis was found to be 7.5%. Of the 14 study patients, two had thoracic, ten had lumbar, and two had both lumbar and sacral vertebral involvement. The associated pathologies were spondylodiscitis, narrowing in the intervertebral space, inflammation or abscess formation in the paravertebral soft tissue, and osteophyte formation. None of the patients had a collapsed vertebral body, angulation deformity, or inflammation in the epidural space. In conclusion, the possibility of vertebral involvement should be remembered in chronic brucellosis, particularly in elderly patients who present with back pain or tenderness over the spine. A high index of suspicion and clinical, laboratory, and radiological examinations help confirm the diagnosis of vertebral involvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2a, b.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Young EJ (2000) Brucella species. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R (eds) Principles and practise of infectious diseases, 5th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, pp 2386–2392

  2. Hall WH (1991) Brucellosis. In: Evans AS, Brachman PS (eds) Human bacterial infections, 2nd edn. Plenum, New York, pp 133–149

  3. Memish Z, Mah MW, Al Mahmoud S, Al Shaalan M, Khan MY (2000) Brucella bacteraemia: clinical and laboratory observations in 160 patients. J Infect 40:59–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Finn T.B (1999) Brucellosis. In: Armstrong D, Cohen J (eds) Infectious diseases. Geographic and travel medicine. Harcourt, London, pp 15–17

  5. Madkour MM, Sharif HS, Abed MY et al (1988) Osteoarticular brucellosis: results of bone scintigraphy in 140 patients. Am J Roentgenol 150:1101–1105

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tasova Y, Saltoglu N, Sahin G, Aksu HS (1999) Osteoarticular involvement of brucellosis in Turkey. Clin Rheumatol 18:214–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gonzales-Gay MA, Garcia-Porrua C, Ibanez D et al (1999) Osteoarticular complications of brucellosis in an Atlantic area of Spain. J Rheumatol 26:141–145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bahar RH, Al-Suhaili AR, Mousa AM, Nawaz MK et al (1988) Brucellosis: appearance on skeletal imaging. Clin Nucl Med 13:102–106

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Colmenoro JD, Jimenez-Mejias ME, Sanchez-Lora FJ et al (1997) Pyogenic, tuberculous, and brucellar vertebral osteomyelitis: a descriptive and comparative study of 219 cases. Ann Rheum Dis 56:709–715

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cordero M, Sanchez I (1991) Brucellar and tuberculous spondylitis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:100–103

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Colmenoro JD, Reguera JM, Martos F et al (1996) Complications associated with Brucella melitensis infection: a study of 530 cases. Medicine 75:195–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Al-Eissa Y, Al-Nasser M (1993) Haematological manifestations of childhood brucellosis. Infection 21:23–26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Akdeniz H, Irmak H, Seçkinli T (1997) Hematological manifestation in brucellosis cases in Turkey. Acta Med Okayama 52:63–65

    Google Scholar 

  14. Colmenero JD, Cisneros JM, Orjuela DL, Pachon J, Garcia-Portales R, Rodriguez-Sampedro F, Juarez C (1992) Clinical course and prognosis of brucella spondylitis. Infection 20:38–42

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Buchelt M, Lack W, Kutschera HP, Katterchafka T, Kiss H (1993) Comparison of tuberculous and pyogenic spondylitis. An analysis of 122 cases. Clin Orthop 296:192–199

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gotuzzo E, Carrillo C, Guerra J (1986) An evaluation of diagnostic methods for brucellosis. The value of bone marrow culture. J Infect Dis 153:122–125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rajapakse CNA, Al-Aska AK, Al-Orainey I, Halim K, Arabi K (1987) Spinal brucellosis. Br J Rheumatol 26:28–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharif HS, Aideyan OA, Clark DC, Madkour MM, Aabed MY, Mattsson TA, Al-Deeb SM, Moutaery KR (1989) Brucellar and tuberculous spondylitis: comparative imaging features. Radiology 171:419–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Namiduru.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Namiduru, M., Karaoglan, I., Gursoy, S. et al. Brucellosis of the spine: evaluation of the clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings of 14 patients. Rheumatol Int 24, 125–129 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-003-0339-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-003-0339-7

Keywords

Navigation