Zusammenfassung
Das Merkel-Zell-Karzinom (MCC; kutanes neuroendokrines Karzinom) ist ein seltener Tumor unklarer Histogenese, der vorwiegend an sonnenexponierten Arealen bei älteren Patienten auftritt. Eine höhere Inzidenz und Auftreten in jüngerem Alter finden sich vorwiegend bei immunsupprimierten Personen, weshalb neben der ultravioletten(UV)-Strahlung auch der Immunsuppression eine pathogenetische Rolle zugesprochen wird. Zusätzlich konnte in 80 % der Fälle ein klonal integriertes Polyomavirus (Merkel-Zell-Polyomavirus, MCPyV) nachgewiesen werden. Klinisch stellt das MCC einen uncharakteristischen Tumor dar. Histopathologisch finden sich monomorphe dermale und/oder subkutane Knoten aus runden bis ovalen mittelgroßen Zellen mit vesikulärem Nukleus und spärlichem Zytoplasma. Die neoplastischen Zellen des MCC exprimieren Zytokeratin (CK) 20 mit punktförmiger („dot-like“) perinukleärer Betonung. Außerdem sind immunhistochemisch pan-CK, neuroendokrine Marker (u. a. Chromogranin A und Synaptophysin), Neurofilamentproteine, CD56, CD57, Bcl-2, TdT und PAX-5 positiv. Die meisten Fälle zeigen auch eine Positivität auf CM2B4, einen gegen MCPyV gerichteten Antikörper. Eine p63-Expression wird bei einem Teil der Fälle beobachtet und war in einigen Studien mit einer günstigen Prognose assoziiert. Die Marker thyroidaler Transkriptionsfaktor-1, „mammalian achaete-scute complex-like 1“, Vimentin, S-100 und CK7 werden beim MCC gewöhnlich nicht exprimiert. Die Prognose ist vorwiegend von der Tumorgröße und dem Lymphknotenstatus abhängig. Das Vorliegen intralymphatischer Tumorkomplexe ist mit einer höheren Rate an Lokalrezidiven und Lymphknotenmetastasen assoziiert. Eine größere Anzahl intratumoraler zytotoxischer T-Lymphozyten ist mit günstiger Prognose, das Vorliegen von > 50 % K-67+-neoplastischer Zellen mit schlechter Prognose vergesellschaftet. Weitere hinsichtlich ihrer prognostischen Relevanz untersuchte morphologische, phänotypische und genetische Faktoren wurden bisher nicht in größeren Kohorten validiert.
Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC, cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma) is a rare form of tumor of unclear histogenesis which predominantly occurs in elderly patients on areas exposed to the sun. A higher incidence and occurrence in younger people is predominantly found in immunosuppressed persons which is why a pathogenetic role is also attributed to immunosuppression in addition to ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Additionally, in 80% of cases clonally integrated polyomavirus (Merkel cell polyomavirus, MCPyV) could be detected. Clinically MCC represents an uncharacteristic tumor. Histopathologically, monomorphic dermal and/or subcutaneous nodes are found consisting of round or oval medium sized cells with a vesicular nucleus and sparse cytoplasm. The neoplastic cells of MCC express cytokeratin (CK) 20 with a dot-like perinuclear accentuation. In addition, pan-CK, neuroendocrine markers (e.g. chromogranin A and synaptophysin), neurofilament proteins, CD56, CD57, Bcl-2, TdT and PAX-5 are immunohistochemically positive. In most cases CM2B4, an antibody against MCPyV is also positive. Expression of p63 has been observed in some of the cases and in some studies was associated with a favorable prognosis. The markers thyroid transcription factor 1, mammalian achaete scute complex like 1, vimentin, S-100 and CK7 are not normally expressed by MCC. The prognosis is primarily dependent on tumor size and the lymph node status. The presence of intralymphatic tumor complexes is associated with a higher rate of local recurrence and lymph node metastasis. A larger number of intratumoral cytotoxic T-lymphocytes is accompanied by a favorable prognosis and the presence of > 50 % of K-67+ neoplastic cells with an unfavorable prognosis. Further morphological, phenotypical and genetic factors have not yet been validated in larger cohorts with respect to the prognostic relevance.
Literatur
Toker C (1972) Trabecular carcinoma of the skin. Arch Dermatol 105:107–110
Tilling T, Moll I (2012) Which are the cells of origin in merkel cell carcinoma? J Skin Cancer 2012:680410
Moll I, Zieger W, Schmelz M (1996) Proliferative merkel cells were not detected in human skin. Arch Dermatol Res 288:184–187
zur Hausen A, Rennspiess D, Winnepenninckx V et al (2013) Early B-cell differentiation in Merkel cell carcinomas: clues to cellular ancestry. Cancer Res 73:4982–4987
Agelli M, Clegg LX (2003) Epidemiology of primary Merkel cell carcinoma in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol 49:832–841
Van Gele M, Kaghad M, Leonard JH et al (2000) Mutation analysis of P73 and TP53 in Merkel cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 82:823–826
Heath M, Jaimes N, Lemos B et al (2008) Clinical characteristics of Merkel cell carcinoma at diagnosis in 195 patients: the AEIOU features. J Am Acad Dermatol 58:375–381
Buell JF, Trofe J, Hanaway MJ et al (2002) Immunosuppression and Merkel cell cancer. Transplant Proc 34:1780–1781
Engels EA, Frisch M, Goedert JJ et al (2002) Merkel cell carcinoma and HIV infection. Lancet 359:497–498
Penn I, First MR (1999) Merkel’s cell carcinoma in organ recipients: report of 41 cases. Transplantation 68:1717–1721
Nghiem P, Jaimes N (2008) Merkel cell carcinoma. In: Wolff K, Goldsmith LA, Katz SI et al (Hrsg) Fitzpatrick’s dermatology in general medicine, 7. Aufl. McGraw-Hill, New York, S 1087–1094
Feng H, Shuda M, Chang Y, Moore PS (2008) Clonal integration of a polyomavirus in human Merkel cell carcinoma. Science 319:1096–1100
Andres C, Belloni B, Puchta U et al (2010) Prevalence of MCPyV in Merkel cell carcinoma and non-MCC tumors. J Cutan Pathol 37:28–34
Loyo M, Guerrero-Preston R, Brait M et al (2010) Quantitative detection of Merkel cell virus in human tissues and possible mode of transmission. Int J Cancer 126:2991–2996
Rodig SJ, Cheng J, Wardzala J et al (2012) Improved detection suggests all Merkel cell carcinomas harbor Merkel polyomavirus. J Clin Invest 122:4645–4653
Xie H, Lee L, Caramuta S et al (2014) MicroRNA expression patterns related to Merkel cell polyomavirus infection in human Merkel cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol 134:507–517
Harms PW, Patel RM, Verhaegen ME et al (2013) Distinct gene expression profiles of viral- and nonviral-associated Merkel cell carcinoma revealed by transcriptome analysis. J Invest Dermatol 133:936–945
Ly TY, Walsh NM, Pasternak S (2012) The spectrum of merkel cell polyomavirus expression in Merkel cell carcinoma, in a variety of cutaneous neoplasms, and in neuroendocrine carcinomas from different anatomical sites. Hum Pathol 43:557–566
Albores-Saavedra J, Batich K, Chable-Montero F et al (2010) Merkel cell carcinoma demographics, morphology, and survival based on 3870 cases: a population based study. J Cutan Pathol 37:20–27
Gupta S, Wang LC, Peñas PF et al (2006) Sentinel lymph node biopsy for evaluation and treatment of patients with Merkel cell carcinoma: the Dana-Farber experience and metaanalysis of the literature. Arch Dermatol 142:685–690
Lemos BD, Storer BE, Iyer JG et al (2010) Pathologic nodal evaluation improves prognostic accuracy in Merkel cell carcinoma: analysis of 5,823 cases as the basis of the first consensus staging system. J Am Acad Dermatol 63:751–761
Wooff JC, Trites JR, Walsh NM, Bullock MJ (2010) Complete spontaneous regression of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Dermatopathol 32:614–617
Senchenkov A, Moran SL (2013) Merkel cell carcinoma: diagnosis, management, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:771e
Brown HA, Sawyer DM, Woo T (2000) Intraepidermal Merkel cell carcinoma with no dermal involvement. Am J Dermatopathol 22:65–69
Iacocca MV, Abernethy JL, Stefanato CM et al (1998) Mixed Merkel cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 39:582–587
Cerroni L, Kerl H (1997) Primary cutaneous neuroendocrine (Merkel cell) carcinoma in association with squamous- and basal-cell carcinoma. Am J Dermatopathol 19:610–613
Paulson KG, Iyer JG, Tegeder AR et al (2011) Transcriptome-wide studies of Merkel cell carcinoma and validation of intratumoral CD8+ lymphocyte invasion as an independent predictor of survival. J Clin Oncol 29:1539–1546
Papalas JA, McKinney MS, Kulbacki E et al (2014) Merkel cell carcinoma with partial B-cell blastic immunophenotype: a potential mimic of cutaneous richter transformation in a patient with chronic lymphocytic lymphoma. Am J Dermatopathol 36:148–152
Ames HM, Bichakjian CK, Liu GY et al (2011) Huntingtin-interacting protein 1: a Merkel cell carcinoma marker that interacts with c-Kit. J Invest Dermatol 131:2113–2120
Stetsenko GY, Malekirad J, Paulson KG et al (2013) p63 expression in Merkel cell carcinoma predicts poorer survival yet may have limited clinical utility. Am J Clin Pathol 140:838–844
Becker JC, Kauczok CS, Ugurel S et al (2008) Merkel cell carcinoma: molecular pathogenesis, clinical features and therapy. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 6:709–719
Paulson KG, Lemos BD, Feng B et al (2009) Array-CGH reveals recurrent genomic changes in Merkel cell carcinoma including amplification of L-Myc. J Invest Dermatol 129:1547–1555
Houben R, Schrama D, Becker JC (2009) Molecular pathogenesis of Merkel cell carcinoma. Exp Dermatol 18:193–198
Arora R, Shuda M, Guastafierro A et al (2012) Survivin is a therapeutic target in Merkel cell carcinoma. Sci Transl Med 4:133–156
Lassacher A, Heitzer E, Kerl H, Wolf P (2008) p14ARF hypermethylation is common but INK4a-ARF locus or p53 mutations are rare in Merkel cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol 128:1788–1796
Allen PJ, Bowne WB, Jaques DP et al (2005) Merkel cell carcinoma: prognosis and treatment of patients from a single institution. J Clin Oncol 23:2300–2309
Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC et al (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7. Aufl. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, S 299–344
Sihto H, Kukko H, Koljonen V et al (2009) Clinical factors associated with Merkel cell polyomavirus infection in Merkel Cell carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:938–945
Schrama D, Peitsch WK, Zapatka M et al (2011) Merkel cell polyomavirus status is not associated with clinical course of Merkel cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol 131:1631–1638
Samimi M, Touzé A, Laude H et al (2014) Vitamin D deficiency is associated with greater tumor size and poorer outcome in Merkel cell carcinoma patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 28:298–308
Llombart B, Monteagudo C, López-Guerrero JA et al (2005) Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of 20 cases of Merkel cell carcinoma in search of prognostic markers. Histopathology 46:622–634
Fernández-Figueras MT, Puig L, Musulen E et al (2005) Prognostic significance of p27Kip1, p45Skp2 and Ki67 expression profiles in Merkel cell carcinoma, extracutaneous small cell carcinoma, and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Histopathology 46:614–621
Asioli S, Righi A, Biase D de et al (2011) Expression of p63 is the sole independent marker of aggressiveness in localised (stage I–II) Merkel cell carcinomas. Mod Pathol 24:1451–1461
Waltari M, Sihto H, Kukko H et al (2011) Association of Merkel cell polyomavirus infection with tumor p53, KIT, stem cell factor, PDGFR-alpha and survival in Merkel cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer 129:619–628
Hall BJ, Pincus LB, Yu SS et al (2012) Immunohistochemical prognostication of Merkel cell carcinoma: p63 expression but not polyomavirus status correlates with outcome. J Cutan Pathol 39:911–917
Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien
Interessenkonflikt. L. Cerroni und I. Fried geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht. Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fried, I., Cerroni, L. Merkel-Zell-Karzinom. Pathologe 35, 467–475 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-014-1935-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-014-1935-x