Zusammenfassung
Adenokarzinome im distalen Ösophagus entstehen mehrheitlich aus einer intestinalen Metaplasie (Barrett-Ösophagus) über die Zwischenstufen einer niedrig- und hochgradigen intraepithelialen Neoplasie. Für die Abschätzung des Karzinomrisikos eines Patienten mit Barrett-Ösophagus ist die histologische Untersuchung endoskopisch entnommener Biopsien der Goldstandard. Biomarker, die in prospektiven Verlaufsstudien (Biomarker-Phase IV-Studien) einen prädiktiven Wert gezeigt haben, sind u. a. Allelverluste von TP53, die Bestimmung der Tetraploidie- bzw. Aneuploidierate oder die Cyclin-D1-Expression. Erfolgversprechende Biomarker aus retrospektiven Biomarker-Phase-III-Studien sind etwa Polysomien, spezifische DNA-Zugewinne und -Verluste, die Proliferationsrate (Mib-1) oder Methylierungsmarker. Da diese Untersuchungen sehr aufwendig sind und die Daten bislang nicht ausreichend bestätigt werden konnten, ist ihr Einsatz in der Routinediagnostik nicht empfehlenswert. Die Anwendung einiger immunhistochemischer Marker für die Klassifikation der intraepithelialen Neoplasie in schwierigen Einzelfällen kann dagegen sinnvoll sein.
Abstract
Adenocarcinomas of the distal esophagus mainly develop from intestinal metaplasia (Barrett’s esophagus) through intermediate steps of low-grade and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Histopathological examination of endoscopic biopsies constitutes the gold standard for estimating the cancer risk of a patient with Barrett’s esophagus. Several prospective biomarker phase IV studies have demonstrated the predictive value of e.g. allelic loss of TP53, tetraploidy and aneuploidy as well as cyclin D1 expression. Among the relevant biomarkers from retrospective phase III studies are polysomy and specific DNA gains and losses, markers of proliferation (Mib-1) and methylation markers. As there are conflicting results in the literature and these analyses are costly, their use in routine patient care cannot yet be recommended. However, immunostaining for several markers may assist in the classification of intraepithelial neoplasia in individual difficult cases.
Literatur
Aldulaimi DM, Cox M, Nwokolo CU (2005) Barrett’s surveillance is worthwhile and detects curable cancers. A prospective cohort study addressing cancer incidence, treatment outcome and survival. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 17:943–950
Bani-Hani K, Martin IG, Hardie LJ et al (2000) Prospective study of cyclin D1 overexpression in Barrett’s esophagus: association with increased risk of adenocarcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1316–1321
Buttar NS, Wang KK, Sebo TJ et al (2001) Extent of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus correlates with risk of adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 120:1630–1639
Fritcher EGB, Brankley SM, Kipp BR et al (2008) A comparison of conventional cytology, DNA ploidy analysis, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Hum Pathol 39:1128–1135
Goldblum JR (2010) Controversies in the diagnosis of Barrett esophagus and Barrett-related dysplasia: one pathologist’s perspective. Arch Pathol Lab Med 134:1479–1484
Goodarzi M, Correa AM, Ajani JA et al (2009) Anti-phosphorylated histone H3 expression in Barrett’s esophagus, low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol 22:1612–1621
Hong MK, Laskin WB, Herman BE et al (1995) Expansion of the Ki-67 proliferative compartment correlates with degree of dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Cancer 75:423–429
Jin Z, Cheng Y, Gu W et al (2009) A multicenter, double-blinded validation study of methylation biomarkers for progression prediction in Barrett’s esophagus. Cancer Res 69:4112–4115
Koop H, Schepp W, Müller-Lissner S, et al (2005) Consensus conference of the DGVS on gastroesophageal reflux. Z Gastroenterol 43:163–164
Lomo LC, Blount PL, Sanchez CA et al (2006) Crypt dysplasia with surface maturation: a clinical, pathologic, and molecular study of a Barrett’s esophagus cohort. Am J Surg Pathol 30:423–435
Maley CC, Galipeau PC, Li X et al (2004) Selectively advantageous mutations and hitchhikers in neoplasms: p16 lesions are selected in Barrett’s esophagus. Cancer Res 64:3414–3427
Maley CC, Galipeau PC, Li X et al (2004) The combination of genetic instability and clonal expansion predicts progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res 64:7629–7633
Mahajan D, Bennett AE, Liu X et al (2010) Grading of gastric foveolar-type dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus. Mod Pathol 23:1–11
Murray L, Sedo A, Scott M et al (2006) TP53 and progression from Barrett’s metaplasia to oesophageal adenocarcinoma in a UK population cohort. Gut 55:1390–1397
Pepe MS, Etzioni R, Feng Z et al (2001) Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1054–1061
Rabinovitch PS, Longton G, Blount PL et al (2001) Predictors of progression in Barrett’s esophagus III: baseline flow cytometric variables. Am J Gastroenterol 96:3071–3083
Reid BJ, Prevo LJ, Galipeau PC et al (2001) Predictors of progression in Barrett’s esophagus II: baseline 17p (p53) loss of heterozygosity identifies a patient subset at increased risk for neoplastic progression. Am J Gastroenterol 96:2839–2848
Ronkainen J, Aro P, Storskrubb T et al (2005) Prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus in the general population: an endoscopic study. Gastroenterology 129:1825–1831
Rucker-Schmidt RL, Sanchez CA, Blount PL et al (2009) Nonadenomatous dysplasia in Barrett esophagus: a clinical, pathologic, and DNA content flow cytometric study. Am J Surg Pathol 33:886–893
Schnell TG, Sontag SJ, Chejfec G et al (2001) Long-term nonsurgical management of Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. Gastroenterology 120:1607–1619
Sikkema M, Kerkhof M, Steyerberg EW et al (2009) Aneuploidy and overexpression of Ki67 and p53 as markers for neoplastic progression in Barrett’s esophagus: a case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol 104:2673–2680
Sikkema M, Jonge PJ de, Steyerberg EW, Kuipers EJ (2010) Risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma and mortality in patients with Barrett’s esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:235–244
Spechler SJ, Fitzgerald RC, Prasad GA, Wang KK (2010) History, molecular mechanisms, and endoscopic treatment of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology 138:854–869
Dekken H van, Hop WC, Tilanus HW et al (2008) Immunohistochemical evaluation of a panel of tumor cell markers during malignant progression in Barrett esophagus. Am J Clin Pathol 130:745–753
Walch AK, Zitzelsberger HF, Bruch J et al (2000) Chromosomal imbalances in Barrett’s adenocarcinoma and the metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence. Am J Pathol 156:555–566
Walch A, Specht K, Braselmann H et al (2004) Coamplification and coexpression of GRB7 and ERBB2 is found in high grade intraepithelial neoplasia and in invasive Barrett’s carcinoma. Int J Cancer 112:747–753
Wang JS, Canto MI (2011) Predicting neoplastic progression in Barrett’s esophagus. Ann Gastroenterol Hepatol 1:1–18
Weston AP, Badr AS, Hassanein RS (1999) Prospective multivariate analysis of clinical, endoscopic, and histological factors predictive of the development of Barrett’s multifocal high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 94:3413–3419
Weston AP, Sharma P, Mathur S et al (2004) Risk stratification of Barrett’s esophagus: updated prospective multivariate analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 99:1657–1666
Yantiss RK (2010) Diagnostic challenges in the pathologic evaluation of Barrett esophagus. Arch Pathol Lab Med 134:1589–1600
Interessenkonflikt
Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Werner, M., Laßmann, S. Intraepitheliale Neoplasie des Barrett-Ösophagus. Pathologe 32 (Suppl 2), 197 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-011-1493-4
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-011-1493-4