Skip to main content
Log in

Neue Konzepte für die operative Therapie des Zervixkarzinoms

New concepts for surgical therapy of cervical carcinoma

  • Schwerpunkt: Zervixpathologie
  • Published:
Der Pathologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Der abdominalen radikalen Hysterektomie (Wertheim-Operation) als derzeitigem Standard der operativen Therapie des Zervixkarzinoms liegen historische Vorstellungen über die Anatomie des weiblichen Beckens und die lokale Tumorausbreitung zugrunde. Die Wertheim-Operation führt — je nach individueller Radikalität des Eingriffs — zur Schädigung essenzieller, nicht tumorinvolvierter Strukturen, u. a. der autonomen Beckennerven. Trotz ihrer vermeintlichen Radikalität muss sie bei histopathologischem Nachweis von Risikofaktoren mit einer adjuvanten Strahlentherapie kombiniert werden, um eine akzeptable lokale Tumorkontrolle zu erzielen. Die totale mesometriale Resektion (TMMR) setzt aus der Entwicklungsbiologie abgeleitete Vorstellungen über die Beckenanatomie und die lokale Tumorausbreitung in ein Radikalitätsprinzip um, das bei völligem Verzicht auf eine adjuvante Strahlentherapie eine sehr hohe lokoregionäre Rezidivfreiheit bei minimaler behandlungsbedingter Morbidität erreicht.

Abstract

Abdominal radical hysterectomy (Wertheim operation) is the current standard of surgical therapy of cervical carcinoma. It is based on historical concepts of female pelvic anatomy and locoregional tumor spread. This surgical therapy — depending on the individual radicality of the operation — leads to damage of essential structures not involved by the tumor, e.g. the autonomic pelvic nerves. Despite of its supposed radicality the Wertheim operation has to be combined with adjuvant radiotherapy in case of histopathological high risk factors to reach acceptable rates of tumor control. The total mesometrial resection (TMMR) uses new insights in pelvic anatomy and local tumor spread derived from developmental biology for a new concept of radicality achieving a high regional control rate with minimal treatment-related morbidity without adjuvant radiotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3

Literatur

  1. Barnes W, Waggoner S, Delgado G et al. (1991) Manometric characterization of rectal dysfunction following radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 42:116–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergmark K, Avall-Lundqvist E, Dickman PW et al. (1999) Vaginal changes and sexuality in women with a history of cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 340:1383–1389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang HY, Chi J-T, Dudoit S et al. (2002) Diversity, topographic differentiation, and positional memory in human fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:12877–12882

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chassagne D, Sismondi P, Horiot JC et al. (1993) A glossary for reporting complications of treatment in gynecological cancers. Radiother Oncol 26:195–202

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fritsch H (1992) The connective tissue sheath of uterus and vagina in the human female fetus. Ann Anat 174:261–266

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fritsch H, Hötzinger H (1995) Tomographical anatomy of the pelvis, visceral pelvic connective tissue, and its compartments. Clin Anat 8:17–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fritsch H, Kühnel W (1992) Development and distribution of adipose tissue in the human pelvis. Early Hum Dev 28:79–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fritsch H, Lienemann A, Brenner E, Ludwikowski B (2004) Clinical anatomy of the pelvic floor. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 175:1–66

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hellebrekers BWJ, Zwinderman AH, Kenter GG et al. (1999) Surgically-treated early cervical cancer: prognostic factors and the significance of depth of tumor invasion. Int J Gynecol Cancer 9:212–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Höckel M (2001) Totale mesometriale Resektion: Nervenschonende erweitert radikale abdominale Hysterektomie. Zentralbl Gynäkol 123:245–249

    Google Scholar 

  11. Höckel M (2003) Totale mesometriale Resektion (TMMR). Operative Therapie des Zervixkarzinoms auf der Grundlage einer aus der Embryonal- und Fetalentwicklung abgeleiteten chirurgischen Anatomie. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 63:1146–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Höckel M, Horn L-C, Hentschel B et al. (2003) Total mesometrial resection: high resolution nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy based on developmentally defined surgical anatomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 13:791–803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Höckel M, Konerding MA, Heußel CP (1998) Liposuction-assisted nerve-sparing extended radical hysterectomy: oncologic rationale, surgical anatomy, and feasibility study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178:971–976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Höckel M, Naumann G, Alexander H et al. (2000) Nervenschonende radikale Hysterektomie. II. Erfahrungsbericht nach 3 Jahren. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 60:320–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Höckel M, Wolff W, Schmidt W, Spanel-Borowski K (2000) Nervenschonende radikale Hysterektomie. I. Anatomische Grundlagen und Operationstechnik. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 60:314–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurman RJ, Amin MB and the Members of the Cancer Committee, College of American Pathologists (1999) Protocol for the examination of the specimens from patients with carcinomas of the cervix. A basis for checklists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 123:55–61

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A et al. (1997) Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet 350:535–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Low JA, Mauger GM, Carmichael JA (1981) The effect of Wertheim hysterectomy upon bladder and urethral function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 139:826–834

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peters WA, Liu PY, Barrett RJ et al. (2000) Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol 18:1606–1613

    Google Scholar 

  20. Piver MS, Rutledge F, Smith JP (1974) Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 44:265–272

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Possover M, Stöber S, Plaul K, Schneider A (2000) Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III. Gynecol Oncol 79:154–157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R et al. (2004) Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique for preserving the autonomic hypogastric nerve. Gynecol Oncol 93:307–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sedlis A, Bundy BN, Rotman MZ et al. (1999) A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol 73:177–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sekido N, Kawai K, Akaza H (1997) Lower urinary tract dysfunction as persistent complication of radical hysterectomy. Int J Urol 4:259–264

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Trimbos JB, Maas CP, Deruiter MC et al. (2001) A nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: guidelines and feasibility in western patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 11:180–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Waggoner SE (2003) Cervical cancer. Lancet 361:2217–2225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wertheim W (1912) The extended abdominal operation for carcinoma uteri (based on 500 operative cases). Am J Obstet Dis Women Child 66:169–232

    Google Scholar 

  28. Einenkel J, Vinokurova S, Ziegert C et al. (2004) Occult local tumor spread in cervical cancer patients. Int J Gynocol Cancer 14 [Suppl 1]:35

    Google Scholar 

  29. Höckel M, Dornhöfer N (2005) The hydra phenomenon of cancer: Why tumors recur locally after microserpically complete resection. Cancer Res 65: 2997–3002

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung

Der Autor dankt seinen Mitarbeitern Dr. Jens Einenkel, Susanne Schrey, Katja Schmidt und Prof. Dr. Lars-Christian Horn, Institut für Pathologie, für wichtige Beiträge zum TMMR-Projekt.

Interessenkonflikt:

Der korrespondierende Autor versichert, dass keine Verbindungen mit einer Firma, deren Produkt in dem Artikel genannt ist, oder einer Firma, die ein Konkurrenzprodukt vertreibt, bestehen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Höckel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Höckel, M. Neue Konzepte für die operative Therapie des Zervixkarzinoms. Pathologe 26, 276–282 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-005-0762-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-005-0762-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation