Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A survey of metaheuristic-based techniques for University Timetabling problems

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
OR Spectrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As well as nearly always belonging to the class of NP-complete problems, university timetabling problems can be further complicated by the often idiosyncratic requirements imposed by the particular institution being considered. It is perhaps due to this characteristic that in the past decade-or-so, metaheuristics have become increasingly popular in the field of automated timetabling. In this paper we carry out an overview of such applications, paying particular attention to the various methods that have been proposed for dealing and differentiating between constraints of varying importance. Our review allows us to classify these algorithms into three general classes, and we make some instructive comments on each of these.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson D (1991) Constructing school timetables using simulated annealing: sequential and parallel algorithms. Manag Sci 37(1):98–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramson D, Krishnamoorthy H, Dang H (1996) Simulated annealing cooling schedules for the school timetabling problem. Asia Pacific J Operational Res 16:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Arntzen H, Løkketangen A (2005) A tabu search heuristic for a university timetabling problem. In: Ikabaki T, Nonobe K, Yagiura M (eds) Metaheuristics: progress as real problem solvers, vol 32. Springer, Berlin, pp 65–86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan N (1991) Examination scheduling: a computerized application. Omega 19(1):37–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batenburg KJ, Palenstijn WJ (2003) A new exam timetabling algorithm. In: Proceedings of the Belgian-Dutch artificial intelligence conference (BNAIC 2003), pp 19–26

  • Birattari M, Sttzle T, Paquete L, Varrentrapp K (2002) A racing algorithm for configuring metaheuristics. In: Langdon WB, Mathias K, Roy R, Davis D, Poli R, Balakrishnan K, Honavar V, Rudolph G, Wegener J, Bull L, Potter MA, Schultz AC, Miller JF, Burke E, Jonoska N (eds) The genetic and evolutionary computation conference (GECCO) 2002. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, New York, pp 11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Boizumault P, Delon Y, Peridy L (1996) Logic programming for examination timetabling. Logic Program 26:217–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke E, Newall JP (1999) A multi-stage evolutionary algorithm for the timetable problem. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 3(1):63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke E, Petrovic M (2002) Recent research directions in automated timetabling. Eur J Oper Res 140(2):266–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke E, Elliman D, Weare R (1995a) The automation of the timetabling process in higher education. J Educ Technol Syst 23:257–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke E, Elliman D, Weare R (1995b) A hybrid genetic algorithm for highly constrained timetabling problems. In: Eshelman L (ed) Genetic algorithms: proceedings of the sixth international conference (ICGA95). Morgan Kaufmann, pp 605–610

  • Burke E, Elliman D, Weare R (1995c) Specialised recombinative operators for timetabling problems. In: The artificial intelligence and simulated behaviour workshop on evolutionary computing, vol 993. Springer, Berlin, pp 75–85

  • Burke E, Elliman DG, Ford PH, Weare R (1996a) Examination timetabling in british universities: a survey. In: Burke E, Ross P (eds) Practice and theory of automated timetabling (PATAT) I, vol 1153. Springer, Berlin, pp 76–92

  • Burke E, Newall JP, Weare RF (1996b) A memetic algorithm for university exam timetabling. In: Burke E, Ross P (eds) Practice and theory of automated timetabling (PATAT) I, vol 1153. Springer, Berlin, pp 241–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke E, Bykov Y, Petrovic M (2001) A multicriteria approach to examination timetabling. In: Burke E, Erben E (eds) practice and theory of automated timetabling (PATAT) III, vol 2070. Springer, Berlin, pp 118–131

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burke E, Bykov Y, Newall JP, Petrovic S (2003a) A time-defined approach to course timetabling. Yugoslav J Oper Res (YUJOR) 13(2):139–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke E, Kendall G, Soubeiga E (2003b) A tabu-search hyperheuristic for timetabling and rostering. J Heuristics 9(6):451–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke E, McCollum B, Meisels A, Petrovic S, Qu R (2007) A graph-based hyper heuristic for timetabling problems. Eur J Oper Res 176

  • Carrasco M, Pato M (2001) A multiobjective genetic algorithm for the class/teacher timetabling problem. In: Burke E, Erben W (eds) Practice and theory of automated timetabling (PATAT) III, vol 2079. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco M, Pato M (2004) Metaheuristics: computer decision-making, chapter A Potts neural network heuristic for the class/teacher timetabling problem. Kluwer, Norwell, pp 173–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter M (1986a) A langarian relaxation approach to the classroom assignment problem. INFOR 27(2):230–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter M (1986b) A survey of practical applications of examination timetabling algorithms. Oper Res 34(2):193–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter M, Laporte G (1998) Recent developments in practical course timetabling. In: Burke E, Carter M (eds) Practice and theory of automated timetabling (PATAT) II, vol 1408. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carter M, Laporte G, Lee SY (1996) Examination timetabling: algorithmic strategies and applications. J Oper Res Soc 47:373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey S, Thompson J (2002) Grasping the examination scheduling problem. In: Burke E, De Causmaecker P (eds) Practice and theory of automated timetabling (PATAT) IV, vol 2740. Springer, Berlin, pp 233–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiarandini M, Socha K, Birattari M, Rossi-Doria O (2003) An effective hybrid approach for the university course timetabling problem. Technical Report AIDA-2003-05, FG Intellektik, FB Informatik, TU Darmstadt, Germany

  • Colorni A, Dorigo M, Maniezzo V (1991) Genetic algorithms and highly constrained problems: the time-table case. In: Schwefel H-P, Manner R (eds) Parallel problem solving from nature (PPSN) I, vol 496. Springer, Berlin, pp 55–59

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Colorni A, Dorigo M, Maniezzo V (1992) A genetic algorithm to solve the timetable problem. Technical Report 90-060 revised, Politecnico di Milano, Italy 1992

  • Colorni A, Dorigo M, Maniezzo V (1997) Metaheuristics for high-school timetabling. Comput Optim Appl 9(3):277–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper T, Kingston J (1996) The complexity of timetable construction problems. In: Burke E, Ross P (eds) Practice and theory of automated timetabling (PATAT) I, vol 1153. Springer, Berlin, pp 283–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Corne D, Ross P, Fang H (1995) Evolving timetables. In: Lance C. Chambers (ed) The practical handbook of genetic algorithms, vol 1. CRC, Florida, pp 219–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa D (1994) A tabu search algorithm for computing an operational timetable. Eur J Oper Res 79:98–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cote P, Wong T, Sabourin R (2005) Application of a hybrid multi-objective evolutionary algorithm to the uncapacitated exam proximity problem. In: Burke E, Trick M (eds) Practice and theory of automated timetabling (PATAT) V, vol 3616. Springer, Berlin, pp 294–312

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Daskalaki S, Birbas T, Housos E (2004) An integer programming formulation for a case study in university timetabling. Eur J Oper Res 153:117–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Werra D (1985) An introduction to timetabling. Eur J Oper Res 19(2):151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deris B, Omatu S, Ohta H, Samat D (1997) University timetabling by constraint-based reasoning: a case study. J Oper Res Soc 48(12):1178–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Gaspero L, Schaerf A (2001) Tabu search techniques for examination timetabling. In: Burke E, Erben E (eds) Practice and theory of automated timetabling (PATAT) III, vol 2079. Springer, Berlin, pp 104–117

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Di Gaspero L, Schaerf A (2002) Multi-neighbourhood local search with application to course timetabling. In: Burke E, De Causmaecker P (eds) Practice and theory of automated timetabling (PATAT) IV, vol 2740. Springer, Berlin, pp 263–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Dueck G (1993) New optimization heuristics: the great deluge algorithm and the record-to-record travel. J Comput Phys 104:86–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmohamed S, Fox G, Coddington P (1998) A comparison of annealing techniques for academic course scheduling. In: Burke E, Carter M (eds) Practice and theory of automated timetabling (PATAT) II, vol 1408. Springer, Berlin, pp 146–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Erben E (2001) A grouping genetic algorithm for graph colouring and exam timetabling. In: Burke E, Erben W (eds), Practice and theory of automated timetabling (PATAT) III, vol 2079. Springer, Berlin, pp 132–158

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Even S, Itai A, Shamir A (1976) On the complexity of timetable and multicommodity flow problems. SIAM J Comput 5(4):691–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenauer E (1994) A new representation and operators for genetic algorithms applied to grouping problems. Evol Comput 2(2):123–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenauer E (1998) Genetic algorithms and grouping problems. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) Computers and intractability—a guide to NP-completeness, 1st edn. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Garey MR, Johnson DS, Stockmeyer L (1976) Some simplified np-complete graph problems. Theor Comput Sci 1:237–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gislen L, Peterson C, Soderberg B (1989) Teachers and classes with neural networks. Int J Neural Syst 1:167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goltz H-J, Matzke D (1999) University timetabling using constraint logic programming. In: Practical aspects of declarative languages, vol 1511 of Lecture notes in computer science, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 320–334

  • Guéret C, Jussien N, Boizumault P, Prins C (1996) Building university timetables using constraint logic programming. In: Practice and theory of automated timetabling I (PATAT I), vol 1153 of Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 130–145

  • Hertz A (1991) Tabu search for large scale timetabling problems. Eur J Oper Res 54(1):39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt C, Vecchi M (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 4598:671–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostuch P (2005) The university course timetabling problem with a 3-phase approach. In: Burke E, Trick M (eds) Practice and theory of automated timetabling (PATAT) V, vol 3616. Springer, Berlin, pp 109–125

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacic M (1993) Timetable construction using markovian neural network. Eur J Oper Res 69:92–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lajos G (1996) Complete university modular timetabling using constraint logic programming. In: Burke E, Ross P (eds) Practice and theory of automated timetabling (PATAT) I, vol 1153. Springer, Berlin, pp 146–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis R (2006) Metaheuristics for University course timetabling. PhD thesis, School of Computing, Napier University, Edinburgh, October

  • Lewis R, Paechter B (2004) New crossover operators for timetabling with evolutionary algorithms. In: Lofti A (ed) The fifth international conference on recent advances in soft computing RASC2004. Nottingham, England, pp 189–194

  • Lewis R, Paechter B (2007) Finding feasible timetables using group based operators. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 11(3):397–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melicio F, Caldeira J (1998) Timetabling implementation aspects by simulated annealing. In: Jifa Gu (ed) IEEE systems science and systems engineering. Beijing. Aceite, pp 553–557

  • Merlot L, Boland N, Hughes B, Stuckey P (2003) A hybrid algorithm for the examination timetabling problem. In: Burke E, De. Causmaeker P (eds) The practice and theory of automated timetabling (PATAT) IV, vol 2740. Springer, Berlin, pp 207–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern C (1989) Algorithms for general graph coloring. PhD thesis, University of New Mexico

  • Morgenstern C, Shapiro H (1990) Coloration neighborhood structures for general graph coloring. In: Proceedings of the first annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms. San Francisco, California, USA, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, pp 226–235

  • Paechter B, Rankin R, Cumming A, Fogarty T (1998) Timetabling the classes of an entire university with an evolutionary algorithm. In: Baeck T, Eiben A, Schoenauer M, Schwefel H (eds) Parallel problem solving from nature (PPSN) V, vol 1498. Springer, Berlin, pp 865–874

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paquete L, Fonseca C (2001) A study of examination timetabling with multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. In: 4th metaheuristics international conference (MIC 2001). Porto, pp 149–154

  • Petrovic S, Bykov Y (2003) A multiobjective optimisation approach for exam timetabling based on trajectories. In: Burke E, De Causmaecker P (eds) The paractice and theory of automated timetabling (PATAT) IV, vol 2740. Springer, Berlin, pp 181–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson JT, Palmer MR, Liepins G, Hilliard M (1989) Some guidelines for genetic algorithms with penalty functions. In: Schaffer JD (ed) The third international conference on genetic algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, San Francisco, pp 191–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross P, Hart E, Corne D (2003) Genetic algorithms and timetabling. In: Ghosh A, Tsutsui K (eds) Advances in evolutionary computing: theory and applications. Springer, New York, pp 755–771

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi-Doria O, Knowles J, Sampels M, Socha K, Paechter B (2002) A local search for the timetabling problem. In: Burke E, Causmaecker P (eds) Practice and theory of automated timetabling (PATAT) IV. Gent, Belgium, pp 124–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaerf A (1996) Tabu search techniques for large high-school timetabling problems. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth national conference on artificial intelligence. AAAI Press/MIT Press, Portland (OR), pp 363–368

  • Schaerf A (1999) Local search techniques for large high-school timetabling problems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber Part A 29(4):368–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaerf A (1999) A survey of automated timetabling. Artif Intell Rev 13(2):87–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelpfeng K, Helber S (2007) Application of a real-world university-course timetabling model solved by integer programming. OR Spect 29(4)

  • Smith K, Abramson D, Duke D (2003) Hopfield neural networks for timetabling: formulations, methods, and comparative results. Comput Ind Eng 44(2):283–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Socha K, Samples M (2003) Ant algorithms for the university course timetabling problem with regard to the state-of-the-art. In: Evolutionary computation in combinatorial optimization (EvoCOP 2003), vol 2611. Springer, Berlin, pp 334–345

  • Socha K, Knowles J, Samples M (2002) A max-min ant system for the university course timetabling problem. In: Dorigo M, Di Caro G, Samples M (eds) Proceedings of ants 2002—third international workshop on ant algorithms (Ants’2002), vol 2463. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas N, Deb K (1994) Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evol Comput 2:221–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JM, Dowsland KA (1998) A robust simulated annealing based examination timetabling system. Comput Oper Res 25(7/8):637–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripathy A (1984) School timetabling—a case in large binary linear integer programming. Manag Sci 30:1473–1489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White G, Chan W (1979) Towards the construction of optimal examination schedules. INFOR 17:219–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu E, Sung K-S (2002) A genetic algorithm for a university weekly courses timetabling problem. Int Trans Oper Res 9:703–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitzler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L (2001) Spea2: improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization. Technical Report 103, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, Switzerland

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cardiff Business School, Pryfysgol Caerdydd/Cardiff University, Colum Drive, Cardiff, CF10 3EU, Wales, UK

    Rhydian Lewis

Authors
  1. Rhydian Lewis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rhydian Lewis.

Additional information

The author would like to give thanks to Ben Paechter at Napier University, Edinburgh, and Barry McCollum of Queens University, Belfast for providing the initial motivation for the production of this work. The author is also grateful to Peter Morgan, Bruce Curry, and Jonathan Thompson at Cardiff University and also an anonymous referee for their helpful comments and insights.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, R. A survey of metaheuristic-based techniques for University Timetabling problems. OR Spectrum 30, 167–190 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-007-0097-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-007-0097-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation