Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of morphology alteration on mechanical properties and fracture toughness of polypropylene/polyamide 6/ethylene polypropylene diene monomer graft maleic anhydride (PP/PA6/EPDM-g-MA) reactive ternary blends

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polymer Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Morphology, mechanical properties and fracture behavior of polypropylene/polyamide 6/ethylene polypropylene diene monomer graft maleic anhydride (PP/PA6/EPDM-g-MA) ternary blends containing various amounts of the EPDM-g-MA rubbery phase (from 0 to 9 wt%), with special attention to the structure–property relationships through the core–shell morphology development, were studied. The fracture surface, deformation micro-mechanisms and mechanical properties of the blends were examined using field emission scanning electron microscopy technique, tensile and impact tests, respectively. The fracture properties were characterized in detail by the linear elastic fracture mechanics method. The fracture energy (GC), fracture toughness (KIC) and impact strength were improved monotonically up to some EPDM-g-MA content, above which the characteristics were appreciably enhanced. These results were attributed to an alteration of this morphology from dispersion of PA6/EPDM-g-MA core–shell particles at low EPDM-g-MA contents to the aggregated structure of core–shell particles at higher EPDM-g-MA contents. The micro-void formation via activation of internal cavitation or debonding of the rubbery phase was found to be responsible for the stress whitening phenomenon that occurred during the impact fracture process and, hence, increased impact toughness.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Utracki LA, Wilkie CA (eds) (2002) Polymer blends handbook, vol 1. Kluwer academic publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paul DR (2012) Polymer blends, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  3. Olabisi O, Robeson LM, Shaw MT (1979) Polymer-polymer miscibility. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Walsh DJ, Higgins JS, Maconnachie A (eds) (2012) Polymer blends and mixtures, vol 89. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wilkinson AN et al (1999) Phase structure in polypropylene/PA6/SEBS blends. Polymer 40(17):4971–4975

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ou Y et al (2004) Maleic anhydride grafted thermoplastic elastomer as an interfacial modifier for polypropylene/polyamide 6 blends. J Appl Polym Sci 91(3):1806–1815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mazidi MM, Aghjeh MKR (2015) Synergistic toughening effects of dispersed components in PP/PA6/EPDM ternary blends; quantitative analysis of the fracture toughness via the essential work of fracture (EWF) methodology. RSC Adv 5(58):47183–47198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yin B et al (2013) Largely improved impact toughness of PA6/EPDM-g-MA/HDPE ternary blends: the role of core–shell particles formed in melt processing on preventing micro-crack propagation. Polymer 54(7):1938–1947

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shangguan Y et al (2017) A new approach to fabricate polypropylene alloy with excellent low-temperature toughness and balanced toughness-rigidity through unmatched thermal expansion coefficients between components. Polymer 112:318–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen F et al (2015) Toughening with little rigidity loss and mechanism for modified polypropylene by polymer particles with core–shell structure. Polymer 65:81–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Virgilio N et al (2009) In situ measure of interfacial tensions in ternary and quaternary immiscible polymer blends demonstrating partial wetting. Macromolecules 42(19):7518–7529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dasari A, Yu ZZ, Mai Y-W (2007) Transcrystalline regions in the vicinity of nanofillers in polyamide-6. Macromolecules 40(1):123–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhattacharyya AR et al (2005) Reactively compatibilised polyamide6/ethylene-co-vinyl acetate blends: mechanical properties and morphology. Polymer 46(5):1661–1674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Liang H et al (1999) Correlation between the interfacial tension and dispersed phase morphology in interfacially modified blends of LLDPE and PVC. Macromolecules 32(5):1637–1642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Valera TS, Morita AT, Demarquette NR (2006) Study of morphologies of PMMA/PP/PS ternary blends. Macromolecules 39(7):2663–2675

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Le Corroller P, Favis BD (2011) Effect of viscosity in ternary polymer blends displaying partial wetting phenomena. Polymer 52(17):3827–3834

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ravati S, Favis BD (2010) Morphological states for a ternary polymer blend demonstrating complete wetting. Polymer 51(20):4547–4561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang D et al (2011) Compatibilization and morphology development of immiscible ternary polymer blends. Polymer 52(1):191–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Abolhasani MM, Arefazar A, Mozdianfard M (2010) Effect of dispersed phase composition on morphological and mechanical properties of PET/EVA/PP ternary blends. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 48(3):251–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Li LP, Yin B, Yang MB (2011) Morphology prediction and the effect of core-shell structure on the rheological behavior of PP/EPDM/HDPE ternary blends. Polym Eng Sci 51(12):2425–2433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Li L et al (2012) Characterization of PA6/EPDM-g-MA/HDPE ternary blends: the role of core-shell structure. Polymer 53(14):3043–3051

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dou R et al (2013) Effect of core-shell morphology evolution on the rheology, crystallization, and mechanical properties of PA6/EPDM-g-MA/HDPE ternary blend. J Appl Polym Sci 129(1):253–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mazidi MM, Aghjeh MKR, Hasanpour M (2018) Fracture resistance and micromechanical deformations in PP/PA6/EPDM ternary blends: effect of rubber functionality, dispersion state and loading conditions. Eng Fract Mech 191(2018):65–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dou R et al (2015) Toughening of PA6/EPDM-g-MAH/HDPE ternary blends via controlling EPDM-g-MAH grafting degree: the role of core–shell particle size and shell thickness. Polym Bull 72(2):177–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou Y et al (2013) Effect of EPDM-g-MAH on the morphology and properties of PA6/EPDM/HDPE ternary blends. Polym Eng Sci 53(9):1845–1855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang Z et al (2014) Inducing a network structure of rubber phase: an effective approach to toughen polymer without sacrificing stiffness. RSC Adv 4(105):60617–60625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Majumdar B, Keskkula H, Paul DR (1994) Morphology development in toughened aliphatic polyamides. Polymer 35(7):1386–1398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang W et al (2009) Rheological characterization and morphology of nylon 1212/functional elastomer blends. J Appl Polym Sci 112(2):953–962

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mazidi MM et al (2016) Structure–property relationships in super-toughened polypropylene-based ternary blends of core–shell morphology. RSC Adv 6(2):1508–1526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen F et al (2015) Balanced toughening and strengthening of ethylene–propylene rubber toughened isotactic polypropylene using a poly (styrene-b-ethylene–propylene) diblock copolymer. RSC Adv 5(27):20831–20837

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Rösch J, Mülhaupt R (1994) The role of core/shell-microparticle dispersions in polypropylene/polyamide-6 blends. Polym Bull 32(5-6):697–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim G-M et al (1998) Micromechanical deformation processes in toughened PP/PA/SEBS-g-MA blends prepared by reactive processing. Acta Polym 49(2-3):88–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tucker JD, Sunggyu L, Einsporn RL (2000) A study of the effect of PP-g-MA and SEBS-g-MA on the mechanical and morphological properties of polypropylene/nylon 6 blends. Polym Eng Sci 40(12):2577–2589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Roeder J et al (2002) Polypropylene/polyamide-6 blends: influence of compatibilizing agent on interface domains. Polym Test 21(7):815–821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zeng N et al (2002) Study on the microstructures and mechanical behaviour of compatibilized polypropylene/polyamide-6 blends. Polym Int 51(12):1439–1447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Wilkinson AN, Clemens ML, Harding VM (2004) The effects of SEBS-g-maleic anhydride reaction on the morphology and properties of polypropylene/PA6/SEBS ternary blends. Polymer 45(15):5239–5249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bai S-L et al (2005) Polypropylene/polyamide 6/polyethylene-octene elastomer blends. Part 3. Mechanisms of volume dilatation during plastic deformation under uniaxial tension. Polymer 46(17):6437–6446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bai S-L et al (2004) Microstructures and mechanical properties of polypropylene/polyamide 6/polyethelene-octene elastomer blends. Polymer 45(9):3063–3071

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Shashidhara GM et al (2009) Effect of PP-g-MAH compatibilizer content in polypropylene/nylon-6 blends. Polym Bull 63(1):147–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Aranburu N, Eguiazabal JI (2013) Compatible blends of polypropylene with an amorphous polyamide. J Appl Polym Sci 127(6):5007–5013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Shokoohi S, Arefazar A, Naderi G (2011) Compatibilized Polypropylene/Ethylene–Propylene–Diene-Monomer/Polyamide6 ternary blends: effect of twin screw extruder processing parameters. Mater Des 32(3):1697–1703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Shokoohi S, Arefazar A, Naderi G (2012) Compatibilized PP/EPDM/PA6 ternary blends: extended morphological studies. Polym Adv Technol 23(3):418–424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Rösch J, Mülhaupt R (1993) Comparison of maleic anhydride-grafted poly (propylene) with maleic anhydride-grafted polystyrene-block-poly (ethene-co-but-1-ene)-block-polystyrene as blend compatibilizers of poly (propylene)/polyamide-6 blends. Die Makromol Chem Rapid Commun 14(8):503–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rösch J (1995) Modeling the mechanical properties in polypropylene/polyamide-6 blends with core shell morphology. Polym Eng Sci 35(24):1917–1922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rösch J, Mülhaupt R (1995) Mechanical and morphological properties of elastomer-modified polypropylene/polyamide-6 blends. J Appl Polym Sci 56(12):1599–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim G-M, Michler GH (1998) Micromechanical deformation processes in toughened and particle filled semicrystalline polymers: part 2. Model representation for micromechanical deformation processes. Polymer 39(23):5699–5703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Ohlsson B, Hassander H, Törnell B (1998) Effect of the mixing procedure on the morphology and properties of compatibilized polypropylene/polyamide blends. Polymer 39(20):4715–4721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Liu H et al (2006) Toughening and compatibilization of polypropylene/polyamide-6 blends with a maleated–grafted ethylene-co-vinyl acetate. J Appl Polym Sci 99(6):3300–3307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Roeder J et al (2002) Polypropylene/polyamide-6 blends: influence of compatibilizing agent on interface domains. Polym Test 21(7):815–821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kristofic M, Ujhelyiová A (2012) Compatibilisation of PP/PA blends. Fibres Text East Eur 4(93):30–36

    Google Scholar 

  51. Guo HF et al (1997) Prediction and manipulation of the phase morphologies of multiphase polymer blends: 1. Ternary systems. Polymer 38(4):785–794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Hobbs SY, Dekkers MEJ, Watkins VH (1988) Effect of interfacial forces on polymer blend morphologies. Polymer 29(9):1598–1602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Reignier J, Favis BD (2000) Control of the subinclusion microstructure in HDPE/PS/PMMA ternary blends. Macromolecules 33(19):6998–7008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Luzinov I et al (1999) Composition effect on the core–shell morphology and mechanical properties of ternary polystyrene/styrene–butadiene rubber/polyethylene blends. Polymer 40(10):2511–2520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Wu S (1982) Polymer interface and adhesion. Marcel Dekker, Wilmington

    Google Scholar 

  56. Fleischer CA, Morales AR, Koberstein JT (1994) Interfacial modification through end group complexation in polymer blends. Macromolecules 27(2):379–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Kinloch AJ (ed) (2013) Fracture behaviour of polymers. Springer

  58. Bucknall CB (1977) Toughened plastics. Applied Science Publishers, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  59. Kinloch AJ, Young RJ (1983) Fracture behaviour of polymers. Springer

  60. Walker I, Collyer AA (1994) Rubber toughening mechanisms in polymeric materials. In: Rubber toughened engineering plastics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 29–56

  61. Grein C, Kausch HH, Béguelin P (2003) Characterisation of toughened polymers by LEFM using an experimental determination of the plastic zone correction. Polym Test 22(7):733–746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Mazidi MM, Razavi Aghjeh MK, Abbasi F (2013) Unstable fracture behavior of rubber toughened poly (styrene-co-acrylonitrile). J Macromol Sci Part B 52(8):1158–1182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Polymeric Materials, Sahand University of Technology, Sahand New Town, Tabriz, Iran

    M. Hasanpour, M. K. Razavi Aghjeh, M. Mehrabi Mazidi & B. Afsari

  2. Faculty of Polymer Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, Sahand New Town, Tabriz, Iran

    M. Hasanpour, M. K. Razavi Aghjeh, M. Mehrabi Mazidi & B. Afsari

Authors
  1. M. Hasanpour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. K. Razavi Aghjeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Mehrabi Mazidi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. B. Afsari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Hasanpour.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hasanpour, M., Razavi Aghjeh, M.K., Mehrabi Mazidi, M. et al. Effect of morphology alteration on mechanical properties and fracture toughness of polypropylene/polyamide 6/ethylene polypropylene diene monomer graft maleic anhydride (PP/PA6/EPDM-g-MA) reactive ternary blends. Polym. Bull. 77, 3767–3794 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-019-02870-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-019-02870-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation