Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of b and uds quark jets to gluon jets

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields

Abstract

Symmetric three-jet events are selected from hadronic Z0 decays such that the two lower energy jets are each produced at an angle of about 150° with respect to the highest energy jet. In some cases, a displaced secondary vertex is reconstructed in one of the two lower energy jets, which permits the other lower energy jet to be identified as a gluon jet through anti-tagging. In other cases, the highest energy jet is tagged as a b jet or as a light quark (uds) jet using secondary vertex or track impact parameter and momentum information. Comparing the two lower energy jets of the events with a tag in the highest energy jet to the anti-tagged gluon jets yields a direct comparison of b, uds and gluon jets, which are produced with the same energy of about 24 GeV and under the same conditions. We observe b jets and gluon jets to have similar properties as measured by the angular distribution of particle energy around the jet directions and by the fragmentation functions. In contrast, gluon jets are found to be significantly broader and to have a markedly softer fragmentation function than uds jets. For the k jet finder with y cut=0.02, we find $${«ngle n^{⤪ ch.}»ngle {⤪ gluon}⩈er «ngle n^{⤪ ch.}»ngle {⤪ b} {⤪ quark}}=1.089pm 0.024 ({⤪ stat.})pm0.024 ({⤪ syst.})$$ $${«ngle n^{⤪ ch.}»ngle {⤪ gluon}⩈er «ngle n^{⤪ ch.}»ngle {⤪ uds} {⤪ quark}}=1.390pm 0.038 ({⤪ stat.})pm0.032 ({⤪ syst.})$$ as the ratios of the mean charged particle multiplicity in the gluon jets compared to the b and uds jets. Results are also reported using the cone jet finder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. OPAL Collaboration, M.Z. Akrawy et al., Phys. Lett. B261 (1991) 334; OPAL Collaboration, G. Alexander et al., Phys. Lett. B265 (1991) 462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. OPAL Collaboration, P.D. Acton et al., Z. Phys. C58 (1993) 387.

    Google Scholar 

  3. OPAL Collaboration, R. Akers et al., Z. Phys. C68 (1995) 179

    Google Scholar 

  4. CDF Collaboration, F. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 74 (1995) 2626; D0 Collaboration, S. Abachi et al. Phys. Rev. Lett 74 (1995) 2632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. OPAL Collaboration, K. Ahmet et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A305 (1991) 275.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Allport et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A324 (1993) 34; P. Allport et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A346 (1994) 476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. OPAL Collaboration, G. Alexander et al., Z. Phys. C52 (1991) 175.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Catani et al., Phys. Lett. B269 (1991) 432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J.E. Huth et al., Research Directions for the Decade, Snowmass (1990), p.134, ed. E.L. Berger (World Scientific, Singapore); CDF Collaboration, F. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. D45 (1992) 1448.

  10. OPAL Collaboration, R. Akers et al., Z. Phys. C63 (1994) 197.

    Google Scholar 

  11. OPAL Collaboration, P.D. Acton et al., Phys. Lett. B273 (1991) 355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Allison et al., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A317 (1992) 47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Sjöstrand, Comp. Phys. Comm. 39 (1986) 347; T. Sjöstrand and M. Bengtsson, Comp. Phys. Comm. 43 (1987) 367; T. Sjöstrand, CERN-TH.6488/92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. V. Khoze in Proc. Int. Symp. Lepton Photon Interactions, Stanford 1989, ed. M. Riordan (World Scientific, Singapore) 1990.

  15. R. Hemingway in Proc. XXVII Int. Conf. on High Energy Physics, Glasgow 1994, ed. P.J. Bussey and I.G. Knowles (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia)

  16. Review of Particle Properties, Phys. Rev. D50 (1994) 1173.

  17. S. Jadach, Z. Was, R. Decker and J.H. Kühn, Comp. Phys. Comm. 76 (1993) 361.

    Google Scholar 

  18. OPAL Collaboration, R. Akers et al., Z. Phys. C66 (1995) 555.

    Google Scholar 

  19. OPAL Collaboration, R. Akers et al., “A study of b quark fragmentation into B0 and B+ mesons at LEP”, CERN-PPE/95-122, to appear in Phys. Lett. B.

  20. G. Marchesini, B.R. Webber et al., Comp. Phys. Comm. 67 (1992) 465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. L. Lönnblad, Comp. Phys. Comm. 71 (1992) 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Odorico, Comp. Phys. Comm. 32 (1984) 139; R. Odorico, Comp. Phys. Comm. 59 (1990) 527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. OPAL Collaboration, M. Z. Akrawy et al., Z. Phys. C47 (1990) 505.

    Google Scholar 

  24. CDF Collaboration, F. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J.W. Gary, Phys. Rev. D49 (1994) 4503.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Consortia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

OPAL Collaboration. A comparison of b and uds quark jets to gluon jets. Z Phys C - Particles and Fields 69, 543–560 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002880050059

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002880050059

Keywords

Navigation