Skip to main content
Log in

Protection zone in a diffusive predator–prey model with Beddington–DeAngelis functional response

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In any reaction–diffusion system of predator–prey models, the population densities of species are determined by the interactions between them, together with the influences from the spatial environments surrounding them. Generally, the prey species would die out when their birth rate is too low, the habitat size is too small, the predator grows too fast, or the predation pressure is too high. To save the endangered prey species, some human interference is useful, such as creating a protection zone where the prey could cross the boundary freely but the predator is prohibited from entering. This paper studies the existence of positive steady states to a predator–prey model with reaction–diffusion terms, Beddington–DeAngelis type functional response and non-flux boundary conditions. It is shown that there is a threshold value \(\theta _0\) which characterizes the refuge ability of prey such that the positivity of prey population can be ensured if either the prey’s birth rate satisfies \(\theta \ge \theta _0\) (no matter how large the predator’s growth rate is) or the predator’s growth rate satisfies \(\mu \le 0\), while a protection zone \(\Omega _0\) is necessary for such positive solutions if \(\theta <\theta _0\) with \(\mu >0\) properly large. The more interesting finding is that there is another threshold value \(\theta ^*=\theta ^*(\mu ,\Omega _0)<\theta _0\), such that the positive solutions do exist for all \(\theta \in (\theta ^*,\theta _0)\). Letting \(\mu \rightarrow \infty \), we get the third threshold value \(\theta _1=\theta _1(\Omega _0)\) such that if \(\theta >\theta _1(\Omega _0)\), prey species could survive no matter how large the predator’s growth rate is. In addition, we get the fourth threshold value \(\theta _*\) for negative \(\mu \) such that the system admits positive steady states if and only if \(\theta >\theta _*\). All these results match well with the mechanistic derivation for the B-D type functional response recently given by Geritz and Gyllenberg (J Theoret Biol 314:106–108, 2012). Finally, we obtain the uniqueness of positive steady states for \(\mu \) properly large, as well as the asymptotic behavior of the unique positive steady state as \(\mu \rightarrow \infty \).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beddington JR (1975) Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency. J Animal Ecol 44:331–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen WY, Wang MX (2005) Qualitative analysis of predator–prey model with Beddington–DeAngelis functional response and diffusion. Math Comput Model 42:31–44

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall MG, Rabinowitz PH (1971) Bifurcation from simple eigenvalues. J Funct Anal 8:321–340

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cui RH, Shi JP, Wu BY (2014) Strong Allee effect in a diffusive predator–prey system with a protection zone. J Differ Equ 256:108–129

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis DL, Goldstein RA, O’Neill RV (1975) A model for tropic interaction. Ecology 56:881–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov DT, Kojouharov HV (2005) Complete mathematical analysis of predator–prey models with linear prey growth and Beddington–DeAngelis functional response. Appl Math Comput 162:523–538

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Du YH, Liang X (2008) A diffusive competition model with a protection zone. J Differ Equ 244:61–86

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Du YH, Shi JP (2006) A diffusive predator–prey model with a protection zone. J Differ Equ 229:63–91

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Du YH, Shi JP (2007) Allee effect and bistability in a spatially hererogeneous predator–prey model. J Differ Equ 359:4557–4593

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Du YH, Peng R, Wang MX (2009) Effect of a protection zone in the diffusive Leslie predator-prey model. J Differ Equ 246:3932–3956

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • González-Olivares E, Ramos-jiliberto R (2003) Dynamic consequences of prey refuges in a simple model system: more prey, fewer predators and enhanced stability. Ecol Model 166:135–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geritz S, Gyllenberg M (2012) A mechanistic derivation of the DeAngelis–Beddington functional response. J Theoret Biol 314:106–108

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Guo GH, Wu JH (2010) Multiplicity and uniqueness of positive solutions for a predator–prey model with B-D functional response. Nonlinear Anal 72:1632–1646

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Guo GH, Wu JH (2012) The effect of mutual interference between predators on a predator–prey model with diffusion. J Math Anal Appl 389:179–194

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haque M, Rahman MS, Venturino E, Li BL (2014) Effect of a functional response-dependent prey refuge in a predator–prey model. Ecol Complex 20:248–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko W, Ryu K (2006) Qualitative analysis of a predator–prey model with Holling type II functional response incorporating a prey refuge. J Differ Equ 231:534–550

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lin CS, Ni WM, Takagi I (1988) Large amplitude stationary solutions to a chemotaxis system. J Differ Equ 72:1–27

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • López-Gómez J (2001) Spectral theory and nonlinear functional analysis. Res Notes Math, vol 426. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

  • Lou Y, Ni WM (1996) Diffusion, self-diffusion and cross-diffusion. J Differ Equ 131:79–131

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lou Y, Ni WM (1999) Diffusion vs cross-diffusion: an elliptic approach. J Differ Equ 154:157–190

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee D (2016) The effect of refuge and immigration in a predator–prey system in the presence of a competitor for the prey. Nonlinear Anal RWA 31:277–287

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Oeda K (2011) Effect of cross-diffusion on the stationary problem of a prey–predator model with a protection zone. J Differ Equ 250:3988–4009

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pang PYH, Wang MX (2003) Qualitative analysis of a ratio-dependt predator-prey system with diffusion. Proc R Soc Edinburgh 133A:919–942

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz PH (1971) Some global results for nonlinear eigenvalue problems. J Funct Anal 7:487–513

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sarwardi S, Mandal PK, Ray S (2012) Analysis of a competitive prey–predator system with a prey refuge. Biosystems 110:133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1987) Prey refuges and predator–prey stability. Theoret Popul Biol 31:1–12

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YX, Li WT (2013) Effect of cross-diffusion on the stationary problem of a diffusive competition model with a protection zone. Nonlinear Anal RWA 14:224–245

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Wang J (2012) Influence of prey refuge on predator–prey dynamics. Nonlinear Dyn 67:191–201

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wei FY, Fu QY (2016) Hopf bifurcation and stability for predator–prey systems with Beddington–DeAngelis type functional response and stage structure for prey incorporating refuge. Appl Math Model 40:126–134

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang RZ, Zhang CR (2016) Dynamics in a diffusive predator–prey system with a constant prey refuge and delay. Nonlinear Anal RWA 31:1–22

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zou XL, Wang K (2011) The protection zone of biological population. Nonlinear Anal RWA 12:956–964

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sining Zheng.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11171048).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, X., Zheng, S. Protection zone in a diffusive predator–prey model with Beddington–DeAngelis functional response. J. Math. Biol. 75, 239–257 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-016-1082-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-016-1082-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation