Skip to main content
Log in

On some mortality rate processes and mortality deceleration with age

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A specific mortality rate process governed by the non-homogeneous Poisson process of point events is considered and its properties are studied. This process can describe the damage accumulation in organisms experiencing external shocks and define its survival characteristics. It is shown that, although the sample paths of the unconditional mortality rate process are monotonically increasing, the population mortality rate can decrease with age and, under certain assumptions, even tend to zero. The corresponding analysis is the main objective of this paper and it is performed using the derived conditional distributions of relevant random parameters. Several meaningful examples are presented and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson JJ (2000) A vitality-based model relating stressors and environmental properties to organism survival. Ecol Monogr 70:445–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beard RE (1959) Note on some mathematical mortality models. In: Wolstenholme CEW, Connor MO (eds) The lifespan of animals. Little, Brown, Boston, pp 302–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey JR, Liedo P, Orozco D, Vaupel JW (1992) Slowing of mortality rates at older ages in large medfy cohorts. Science 258:457–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cha JH, Mi J (2007) Study of a stochastic failure model in a random environment. J Appl Probab 44:151–163

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein M (2008) Failure rate modeling for reliability and risk. Springer, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein M (2012a) On ordered subpopulations and population mortality at advanced ages. Theor Popul Biol 81:292–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein M (2012b) Discussing the Strehler–Mildvan model of mortality. Demogr Res 26:191–206

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gampe J (2010) Supercentenarians. Demographic Research Monographs, Ch. III. In: Maier H, Gampe J, Jeune B, Robine JM, Vaupel J et al (eds) Human mortality beyond age 110. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 219–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannisto V, Lauritsen J, Thatcher AR, Vaupel JW (1994) Reduction in mortality at advanced ages: several decades of evidence from 27 countries. Popul Dev Rev 20:793–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemoine AJ, Wenocur ML (1986) A note on shot-noise and reliability modeling. Oper Res 34:320–323

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li T, Anderson JJ (2009) The vitality model: a way to understand population survival and demographic heterogeneity. Theor Popul Biol 76:118–131

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Missov TI, Finkelstein M (2011) Admissible mixing distributions for general class of mixture survival models with known asymptotics. Theor Popul Biol 80:64–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moolgavkar SH (2004) Commentary: fifty years of the multistage model: remarks in a landmark paper. Int J Epidemiol 33(6):1182–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moolgavkar SH, Luebeck EG (2003) Multistage carcinogenesis and the incidence of human cancer. Genes Chromosom Cancer 38:302–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross S (1996) Stoch Process. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaked M, Shanthikumar J (2007) Stoch Orders. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strehler L, Mildvan AS (1960) General theory of mortality and aging. Science 132:14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaupel JW, Manton KG, Stallard E (1979) The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography 16:439–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaupel JW, Yashin AI (1985) Heterogeneity’s ruses: some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics. Am Stat 39:176–185

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yashin AI, Iachine IA, Begun AS (2000) Mortality modeling: a review. Math Popul Stud 8:305–332

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Editor and the referees for helpful comments and suggestions, which have improved the presentation of this paper. The work of the first author was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (No. 2011-0017338). The work of the first author was also supported by Priority Research Centers Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2009-0093827). The work of the second author was supported by the NRF (National Research Foundation of South Africa) grant IFR2011040500026.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji Hwan Cha.

Appendix: Proof of Theorem 1

Appendix: Proof of Theorem 1

Proof

Let \(0\le T_1 \le T_2 \le \cdots \) be the sequential arrival times of shocks in the NHPP \(\{N(t), t\ge 0\}\) with rate \(\lambda (x).\) Note that the full history of \(\{N(u),0\le u\le t\}\) can be equivalently specified in terms of \(\{T_1 ,T_2 ,\ldots ,T_{N(t)} ,N(t)\}.\) Then, in accordance with (7), the survival function of an organism given the shocks history is

$$\begin{aligned} P(T>t\,|\,N(u),0\le u\le t)= & {} P(T>t\,|T_1 ,T_2 ,\ldots ,T_{N(t)} ,N(t))\nonumber \\= & {} \exp \left\{ {-\int _0^t {\mu _0 (u)du} } \right\} \exp \left\{ {-\eta \int _0^t {N(u)du} } \right\} \nonumber \\= & {} \exp \left\{ {-\int _0^t {\mu _0 (u)du} } \right\} \exp \left\{ {-\sum _{i=1}^{N(t)} {\eta (t-T_i )} } \right\} .\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(11)

Observe that the joint distribution of \((T_1 ,T_2 ,\ldots ,T_{N(t)} ,N(t))\) is given by

$$\begin{aligned}&f_{T_1 ,T_2 ,\ldots ,T_{N(t)} ,N(t)} (t_1 ,t_2 ,\ldots ,t_n ,n)\nonumber \\&\quad =\lambda (t_1 )\exp \left\{ {-\int _0^{t_1 } {\lambda (u)du} } \right\} \lambda (t_2 )\exp \left\{ {-\int _{t_1 }^{t_2 } {\lambda (u)du} } \right\} \ldots \nonumber \\&\qquad \times \,\lambda (t_n )\exp \left\{ {-\int _{t_{n-1} }^{t_n } {\lambda (u)du} } \right\} \exp \left\{ {-\int _{t_n }^t {\lambda (u)du} } \right\} \nonumber \\&\quad =\left( {\prod _{i=1}^n {\lambda (t_i )} } \right) \exp \left\{ {-\int _0^t {\lambda (u)du} } \right\} , \quad 0\le t_1 \le t_2 \le \cdots \le t_n \le t, \quad n=0,1,2,\ldots , \nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(12)

where, \(\exp \left\{ {-\int _0^{t_1 } {\lambda (u)du} } \right\} \) represents the probability that there is no shock in \((0,t_1 )\), then \(\lambda (t_1 )\) represents the probability that a shock occurs at \(t_1 \), then \(\exp \left\{ {-\int _{t_1 }^{t_2 } {\lambda (u)du} } \right\} \) represents that the probability that there is no shock in \((t_1 ,t_2 )\), then \(\lambda (t_2 )\) represents the probability that a shock occurs at \(t_2 \), and so forth.

Therefore, combining (11) and (12), integrating out \(T_1 ,T_2 ,\ldots ,T_n \) and using the properties of the NHPP, the joint distribution of \(\{T>t,N(t)\}\) is obtained as

$$\begin{aligned}&P(T>t,N(t)=n)\nonumber \\&\quad =\exp \left\{ {-\int _0^t {\mu _0 (u)du} } \right\} \exp \Bigg \{ -\int _0^t {\lambda (u)du} \Bigg \}\nonumber \\&\qquad \times \int _0^t {\ldots } \int _0^{t_3 } {\int _0^{t_2 } } \prod _{i=1}^n {\lambda (t_i )} \exp \left\{ {-\eta (t-t_i )} \right\} dt_1 dt_2\ldots dt_n\nonumber \\&\quad =\exp \left\{ {-\int _0^t {\mu _0 (u)du} } \right\} \exp \left\{ {-\int _0^t {\lambda (u)du} } \right\} \frac{\left( {\int _0^t {\exp \{-\eta (t-x)\}\lambda (x)dx} } \right) ^{n}}{n!},\nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(13)

where, in calculating the multiple integrals, we used the following property: for any function \(\varphi (x)\),

$$\begin{aligned} \int _0^t {\ldots } \int _0^{t_3 } {\int _0^{t_2 } } \prod _{i=1}^n {\varphi (t_i )} dt_1 dt_2 \ldots dt_n =\frac{\left( {\int _0^t {\varphi (x)dx} } \right) ^{n}}{n!}, \end{aligned}$$

which can be directly obtained by integrating with respect to \(t_1 ,t_2 ,\ldots ,t_n \), ‘sequentially’.

From (13),

$$\begin{aligned} P(T>t)= & {} \exp \left\{ {-\int _0^t {\mu _0 (u)du} } \right\} \nonumber \\&\times \exp \Bigg \{-\int _0^t {\lambda (u)du} \Bigg \}\sum _{n=0}^\infty {\frac{\left( {\int _0^t {\exp \{-\eta (t-x)\}\lambda (x)dx} } \right) ^{n}}{n!}}\nonumber \\= & {} \exp \left\{ {-\int _0^t {\mu _0 (u)du} } \right\} \exp \Bigg \{ -\int _0^t {\lambda (u)du} \Bigg \}\nonumber \\&\times \exp \left\{ {\int _0^t {\exp \{-\eta (t-x)\}\lambda (x)dx} } \right\} . \end{aligned}$$
(14)

Finally, from (13) and (14), we have

$$\begin{aligned} P(N(t)=n\,|\,T>t)= & {} \frac{\left( {\int _0^t {\exp \{-\eta (t-x)\}\lambda (x)dx} } \right) ^{n}}{n!} \nonumber \\&\times \exp \Bigg \{-\int _0^t {\exp \{-\eta (t-x)\}\lambda (x)dx} \Bigg \}, \quad n=0,1,2,\ldots .\qquad \nonumber \\ \end{aligned}$$
(15)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cha, J.H., Finkelstein, M. On some mortality rate processes and mortality deceleration with age. J. Math. Biol. 72, 331–342 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-015-0885-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-015-0885-0

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation