Abstract
Orthology detection is an important problem in comparative and evolutionary genomics and, consequently, a variety of orthology detection methods have been devised in recent years. Although many of these methods are dependent on generating gene and/or species trees, it has been shown that orthology can be estimated at acceptable levels of accuracy without having to infer gene trees and/or reconciling gene trees with species trees. Thus, it is of interest to understand how much information about the gene tree, the species tree, and their reconciliation is already contained in the orthology relation on the underlying set of genes. Here we shall show that a result by Böcker and Dress concerning symbolic ultrametrics, and subsequent algorithmic results by Semple and Steel for processing these structures can throw a considerable amount of light on this problem. More specifically, building upon these authors’ results, we present some new characterizations for symbolic ultrametrics and new algorithms for recovering the associated trees, with an emphasis on how these algorithms could be potentially extended to deal with arbitrary orthology relations. In so doing we shall also show that, somewhat surprisingly, symbolic ultrametrics are very closely related to cographs, graphs that do not contain an induced path on any subset of four vertices. We conclude with a discussion on how our results might be applied in practice to orthology detection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aho AV, Sagiv Y, Szymanski TG, Ullman JD (1981) Inferring a tree from lowest common ancestors with an application to the optimization of relational expressions. SIAM J Comput 10: 405–421
Altenhoff AM, Dessimoz C (2009) Phylogenetic and functional assessment of orthologs inference projects and methods. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000262
Berglund AC, Sjölund E, Ostlund G, Sonnhammer EL (2008) InParanoid 6: eukaryotic ortholog clusters with inparalogs. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D263–D266
Böcker S, Dress AWM (1998) Recovering symbolically dated, rooted trees from symbolic ultrametrics. Adv Math 138: 105–125
Brandstädt A, Le VB, Spinrad JP (1999) Graph classes: a survey. SIAM monographs on discrete mathematics and applications. Soc Ind Appl Math, Philadelphia
Byrka J, Guillemot S, Jansson J (2010) New results on optimizing rooted triplets consistency. Discrete Appl Math 158: 1136–1147
Corneil DG, Lerchs H, Stewart Burlingham LK (1981) Complement reducible graphs. Discrete Appl Math 3: 163–174
Datta RS, Meacham C, Samad B, Neyer C, Sjölander K (2009) Berkeley PHOG: phylofacts orthology group prediction web server. Nucleic Acids Res 37: W84–W89
Falls C, Powell B, Snœyink J (2008) Computing high-stringency COGs using Turán-type graphs. Technical report. http://www.cs.unc.edu/~snoeyink/comp145/cogs.pdf
Goodstadt L, Ponting CP (2006) Phylogenetic reconstruction of orthology, paralogy, and conserved synteny for dog and human. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e133
Hubbard TJ, Aken BL, Beal K, Ballester B, Caccamo M, Chen Y, Clarke L, Coates G, Cunningham F, Cutts T, Down T, Dyer SC, Fitzgerald S, Fernandez-Banet J, Graf S, Haider S, Hammond M, Herrero J, Holland R, Howe K, Howe K, Johnson N, Kahari A, Keefe D, Kokocinski F, Kulesha E, Lawson D, Longden I, Melsopp C, Megy K, Meidl P, Ouverdin B, Parker A, Prlic A, Rice S, Rios D, Schuster M, Sealy I, Severin J, Slater G, Smedley D, Spudich G, Trevanion S, Vilella A, Vogel J, White S, Wood M, Cox T, Curwen V, Durbin R, Fernandez-Suarez XM, Flicek P, Kasprzyk A, Proctor G, Searle S, Smith J, Ureta-Vidal A, Birney E (2007) Ensembl 2007. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D610–D617
Huson D, Rupp R, Scornavacca C (2010) Phylogenetic networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kristensen DM, Wolf YI, Mushegian AR, Koonin EV (2011) Computational methods for gene orthology inference. Brief Bioinf 12: 379–391
Lechner M, Findeiß S, Steiner L, Marz M, Stadler PF, Prohaska SJ (2011) Proteinortho: detection of (co-) orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 12: 124
Li L, Stoeckert CJ Jr, Roos DS (2003) Orthomcl: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res 13: 2178–2189
Li H, Coghlan A, Ruan J, Coin LJ, Hériché JK, Osmotherly L, Li R, Liu T, Zhang Z, Bolund L, Wong GK, Zheng W, Dehal P, Wang J, Durbin R (2006) TreeFam: a curated database of phylogenetic trees of animal gene families. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D572–D580
Liu Y, Wang J, Guo J, Chen J (2011) Cographs editing: complexity and parametrized algorithms. In: Fu B, Du DZ (eds) COCOON 2011. Lecture notes computer science, vol 6842. Springer, Berlin, pp 110–121
Maddison WP (1997) Gene trees in species trees. Syst Biol 46: 523–536
Page RDM, Charleston MA (1998) Trees within trees: phylogeny and historical associations. Trends Ecol Evol 13: 356–359
Protti F, Dantas da Silva M, Szwarcfiter JL (2009) Applying modular decomposition to parameterized cluster editing problems. Theory Comput Syst 44: 91–104
Pryszcz LP, Huerta-Cepas J, Gabaldón T (2011) MetaPhOrs: orthology and paralogy predictions from multiple phylogenetic evidence using a consistency-based confidence score. Nucleic Acids Res 39: e32
Rauch Henzinger M, King V, Warnow T (1999) Constructing a tree from homeomorphic subtrees, with applications to computational evolutionary biology. Algorithmica 24: 1–13
Semple C, Steel M (2000) A supertree method for rooted trees. Discrete Appl Math 105: 147–158
Semple C, Steel M (2003) Phylogenetics. Oxford lecture series in mathematics and its applications, vol 24. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Sneath P, Sokal R (1973) Numerical taxonomy. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, pp 230–234
Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV (2000) The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 33–36
Wheeler DL, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bryant SH, Canese K, Chetvernin V, Church DM, Dicuccio M, Edgar R, Federhen S, Feolo M, Geer LY, Helmberg W, Kapustin Y, Khovayko O, Landsman D, Lipman DJ, Madden TL, Maglott DR, Miller V, Ostell J, Pruitt KD, Schuler GD, Shumway M, Sequeira E, Sherry ST, Sirotkin K, Souvorov A, Starchenko G, Tatusov RL, Tatusova TA, Wagner L, Yaschenko E (2008) Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D13–D21
Zhang J (2003) Evolution by gene duplication: an update. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 292–298
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hellmuth, M., Hernandez-Rosales, M., Huber, K.T. et al. Orthology relations, symbolic ultrametrics, and cographs. J. Math. Biol. 66, 399–420 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-012-0525-x
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-012-0525-x