Skip to main content
Log in

Stochastic gene expression in switching environments

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organisms are known to adapt to regularly varying environments. However, in most cases, the fluctuations of the environment are irregular and stochastic, alternating between favorable and unfavorable regimes, so that cells must cope with an uncertain future. A possible response is population diversification. We assume here that the cell population is divided into two groups, corresponding to two phenotypes, having distinct growth rates, and that cells can switch randomly their phenotypes. In static environments, the net growth rate is maximized when the population is homogeneously composed of cells having the largest growth rate. In random environments, growth rates fluctuate and observations reveal that sometimes heterogeneous populations have a larger net growth rate than homogeneous ones, a fact illustrated recently through Monte-Carlo simulations based on a birth and migration process in a random environment. We study this process mathematically by focusing on the proportion f(t) of cells having the largest growth rate at time t, and give explicitly the related steady state distribution π. We also prove the convergence of empirical averages along trajectories to the first moment \({\mathbb{E}_\pi(f)}\) , and provide efficient numerical methods for computing \({\mathbb{E}_\pi(f)}\) .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arkin A., Ross J. and McAdams H. (1998). Stochastic kinetics analysis of developmental pathway bifurcation in phage λ-infected Escherichia coli cells. Genetics 149: 1633–1648

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balaban N., Merrin J., Chait R., Kowalik L. and Leibler S. (2004). Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science 305: 1622–1625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biggar S. and Crabtree G. (2001). Cell signaling can direct either binary or graded transcriptional responses. EMBO J. 20: 3167–3176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blake W., Kaern M., Cantor C. and Collins J. (2003). Noise in eukaryotic gene expression. Nature 422: 633–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Breiman L. (1960). The strong law of large numbers for a class of Markov chains. Ann. Math. Stat. 31: 801–803

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bürger R. (1999). Evolution of genetic variability and the advantage of sex and recombination in changing environments. Genetics 153: 1055–1069

    Google Scholar 

  7. Diaconis P. and Freedman D. (1999). Iterated random functions. Siam Rev. 41: 45–76

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubnau D. and Losick R. (2006). Bistability in bacteria. Molec. Microbio. 61: 564–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Erdelyi, A.: Higher transcendental functions. Bateman Manuscript Project. vol.1. McGraw-Hill (1953)

  10. Ferrell J. (2002). Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14(2): 140–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Graumann P. (2006). Different genetic programs within identical bacteria under identical conditions: the phenomenon of bistability greatly modifies our view on bacterial populations. Molec. Microbiol. 61: 560–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hairer H., Norsett S. and Wanner G. (2000). Solving ordinary differential equations I, nonstiff problems, Springer series in computational mathematics. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jänich K. (2001). Analysis für Physiker und Ingenieure. Springer, Heidelberg

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kearns D. and Losick R. (2005). Cell population heterogeneity during growth of Bacillus subtilis. Genes Dev. 19: 3083–3094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keren I., Shah D., Spoering A., Kaldalu N. and Lewis K. (2004). Specialized persister cells and the mechanism of multidrug tolerance in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 186: 8172–8180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kussell E. and Leibler S. (2005). Phenotypic diversity, population growth and information in fluctuating environments. Science 309: 2075–2078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kussell E., Kishony R., Balaban N. and Leibler S. (2005). Bacterial persistence: a model of survival in changing environments. Genetics 169: 1807–1814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Smits W., Kuipers O. and Veening J. (2006). Phenotypic variation in bacteria: the role of feedback regulation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4: 259–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanaka M., Bergstrom C. and Levin B. (2003). The evolution of mutator genes in bacterial populations: the roles of environmental change and timing. Genetics 164: 843–854

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thattai M. and van Oudenaarden A. (2004). Stochastic gene expression in fluctuating environments. Genetics 167: 523–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Mazza.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gander, M.J., Mazza, C. & Rummler, H. Stochastic gene expression in switching environments. J. Math. Biol. 55, 249–269 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-007-0083-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-007-0083-9

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000)

Navigation