Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp by stochastic differential equations

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Euglycemic Hyperinsulinemic Clamp (EHC) is the most widely used experimental procedure for the determination of insulin sensitivity. In the present study, 16 subjects with BMI between 18.5 and 63.6 kg/m2 have been studied with a long-duration (5 hours) EHC. In order to explain the oscillations of glycemia occurring in response to the hyperinsulinization and to the continuous glucose infusion at varying speeds, we first hypothesized a system of ordinary differential equations (ODEs), with limited success. We then extended the model and represented the experiment using a system of stochastic differential equations (SDEs). The latter allow for distinction between (i) random variation imputable to observation error and (ii) system noise (intrinsic variability of the metabolic system), due to a variety of influences which change over time. The stochastic model of the EHC was fitted to data and the system noise was estimated by means of a (simulated) maximum likelihood procedure, for a series of different hypothetical measurement error values. We showed that, for the whole range of reasonable measurement error values: (i) the system noise estimates are non-negligible; and (ii) these estimates are robust to changes in the likely value of the measurement error. Explicit expression of system noise is physiologically relevant in this case, since glucose uptake rate is known to be affected by a host of additive influences, usually neglected when modeling metabolism. While in some of the studied subjects system noise appeared to only marginally affect the dynamics, in others the system appeared to be driven more by the erratic oscillations in tissue glucose transport rather than by the overall glucose-insulin control system. It is possible that the quantitative relevance of the unexpressed effects (system noise) should be considered in other physiological situations, represented so far only with deterministic models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aït-Sahalia Y. (2002) Maximum likelihood estimation of discretely sampled diffusions: a closed-form approximation approach. Econometrica 70(1): 223–262

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergman R., Ider Y., Bowden C., Cobelli C. (1979) Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity. Am. J. Physiol. 236, E667–E677

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bibby B., Jacobsen M., Sørensen M. (2005) Estimating functions for discretely sampled diffusion-type models. In: Aït-Sahalia Y., Hansen L.(eds) Handbook of Financial Econometrics. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bibby B., Sørensen M. (1995) Martingale estimation functions for discretely observed diffusion processes. Bernoulli 1(1/2): 17–39

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Dacunha-Castelle D., Florens-Zmirnou D. (1986) Estimation of the coefficients of a diffusion from discrete observations. Stochastics 19, 263–284

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Davidian, M., Giltinan, D.: Nonlinear models for repeated measurement data. Chapman & Hall (1995)

  7. DeFronzo R., Ferrannini E. (1991) Insulin resistance. a multifaceted syndrome responsible for NIDDM, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care 14, 173–194

    Google Scholar 

  8. DeFronzo R., Tobin J., Andres R. (1979) Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am. J. Physiol. 237, E214–E223

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ditlevsen S., De Gaetano A. (2005) Stochastic vs. deterministic uptake of dodecanedioic acid by isolated rat livers. Bull. Math. Biol. 67, 547–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Elerian O., Shephard N., Chib S. (2001) Likelihood inference for discretely observed nonlinear diffusions. Econometrica 69, 959–993

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrannini E., Mari A. (1998) How to measure insulin sensitivity. J. Hypertens. 16, 895–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gallant A., Long J. (1997) Estimating stochastic differential equations efficiently by minimum chi-square. Biometrika 84, 124–141

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Gouriroux C., Monfort A., Renault E. (1993) Indirect inference. J. Appl. Economet. 8, 85–118

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hurn A., Lindsay K., Martin V. (2003) On the efficacy of simulated maximum likelihood for estimating the parameters of stochastic differential equations. J. Time Series Anal. 24(1): 45–63

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Kloeden P.E., Platen E. (1992) Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Øksendal B. (2000) Stochastic differential equations, second edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Olson A., Pessin J. (1996) Structure, function, and regulation of the mammalian facilitative glucose transporter gene family. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 16, 235–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pedersen, A.R.: Uniform residuals for discretely observed diffusion processes. Technical. Report. 292, Department of Theoretical Statistics, University of Aarhus, Denmark (1994)

  19. Pedersen A.R. (1995) A new approach to maximum likelihood estimation for stochastic differential equations based on discrete observations. Scand. J. Statist. 22(1):55–71

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Pedersen, A.R.: Likelihood inference by monte carlo methods for incompletely discretely observed diffusion processes. Technical. Report. 1, Department of Biostatistics, University of Aarhus, Denmark (2001)

  21. Picchini U., De Gaetano A., Panunzi S., Ditlevsen S., Mingrone G.: A mathematical model of the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. Theor. Biol. Med. Model. 2(44) (2005)

  22. Sacks, W.: In: A. Lajtha (ed.) Handbook of Neurochemistry, vol. 1.Plenum, New York (1969)

  23. Shoji I., Ozaki T. (1998) Estimation for nonlinear stochastic differential equations by a local linearization method. Stochastic Anal. Appli. 16, 733–752

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Sørensen M. (2000) Prediction-based estimating functions. Economet. J. 3, 123–147

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Starke A. (1992) Determination of insulin sensitivity: methodological considerations. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 20, S17–S21

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tornøe C., Jacobsen J., Madsen H. (2004) Grey-box pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling of a euglycaemic clamp study. J. Math. Biol. 48, 591–604

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Wallace T., Matthews D. (2002) The assessment of insulin resistance in man. Diabet. Med. 19, 527–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoshida N. (1992) Estimation of diffusion processes from discrete observations. J. Multivariate Analy. 41, 220–242

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Zierler K. (1999) Whole body glucose metabolism. Am. J. Physiol. 276, E409–E426

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CNR-IASI BioMatLab, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy

    Umberto Picchini & Andrea De Gaetano

  2. Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Susanne Ditlevsen

Authors
  1. Umberto Picchini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susanne Ditlevsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrea De Gaetano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea De Gaetano.

Additional information

The work was supported by grants from the Danish Medical Research Council and the Lundbeck Foundation to S. Ditlevsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Picchini, U., Ditlevsen, S. & De Gaetano, A. Modeling the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp by stochastic differential equations. J. Math. Biol. 53, 771–796 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-006-0032-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-006-0032-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation