Skip to main content
Log in

Real-Time PCR Assays for Monitoring Anaerobic Fungal Biomass and Population Size in the Rumen

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between copy numbers of internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) and biomass or zoospore count of anaerobic fungi was studied to develop a quantitative real-time PCR-based monitoring method for fungal biomass or population in the rumen. Nine fungal strains were used to determine the relationship between ITS1 copy number and fungal biomass. Rumen fluid from three sheep and a cow were used to determine the relationship between ITS1 copy number and fungal population. ITS1 copy number was determined by real-time PCR with a specific primer set for anaerobic fungi. Freeze-dried fungal cells were weighed for fungal biomass. Zoospore counts were determined by the roll-tube method. A positive correlation was observed between both ITS1 copy number and dry weight and ITS1 copy number and zoospore counts, suggesting that the use of ITS1 copy numbers is effective for estimating fungal biomass and population density. On the basis of ITS1 copy numbers, fluctuations in the fungal population in sheep rumen showed that although the values varied among individual animals, the fungal population tended to decrease after feeding. In the present study, a culture-independent method was established that will provide a powerful tool for understanding the ecology of anaerobic fungi in the rumen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brookman JL, Mennim G, Trinci APJ et al (2000) Identification and characterization of anaerobic gut fungi using molecular methodologies based on ribosomal ITS 1 and 18S rRNA. Microbiology 146:393–403

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dehority BA, Orpin CG (1997) Development of, and natural fluctuations in, rumen microbial populations. In: Hobson PN, Stewart CS (eds) The rumen microbial ecosystem. Elsevier, London, pp 196–245

    Google Scholar 

  3. Denman SE, McSweeney CS (2006) Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 58:572–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Joblin KN (1981) Isolation, enumeration, and maintenance of rumen anaerobic fungi in roll tubes. Appl Environ Microbiol 42:1119–1122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Li J, Heath IB (1992) The phylogenetic relationships of the anaerobic Chytridiomycetous gut fungi (Neocallimasticaceae and the Chytriomycota. 1. Cladistic analysis of ribosomal RNA sequences. Can J Bot 70:1738–1746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsui H, Ban-Tokuda T (2008) Studies on carboxymethyl cellulase and xylanase activities of an anaerobic fungal isolate CR4 from the bovine rumen. Curr Microbiol 57:615–619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Matsui H, Ushida K, Kojima Y (1997) Effect of dietary concentrate on fungal zoosporogenesis in sheep rumen. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 10:599–602

    Google Scholar 

  8. Orpin CG (1975) Studies on the rumen flagellate Neocallimastix frontalis. J Gen Microbiol 91:249–262

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Orpin CG (1994) Anaerobic fungi: taxonomy, biology, and distribution in nature. In: Mountfort DO, Orpin CG (eds) Anaerobic fungi. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 1–45

    Google Scholar 

  10. Orpin CG, Joblin KN (1997) Anaerobic fungi. In: Hobson PN, Stewart CS (eds) The rumen microbiol ecosystem, 2nd edn. Blackie Academic and Professional, Chapman and Hall, pp 129–150

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ozutsumi Y, Tajima K, Takenaka A et al (2006) Real-time PCR detection of the effects of protozoa on rumen bacteria in cattle. Curr Microbiol 52:158–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sekhavati MH, Mesgaran MD, Nassiri MR et al (2009) Development and use of quantitative competitive PCR assays for relative quantifying rumen anaerobic fungal populations in both in vitro and in vivo systems. Mycol Res 113:1146–1153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shinkai T, Kobayashi Y (2007) Localization of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria on plant fibrous materials as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization and real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:1646–1652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tajima K, Aminov RI, Nagamine T et al (2001) Diet-dependent shifts in the bacterial population of the rumen revealed with real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2766–2774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Trinci APJ, Davies DR, Gull K et al (1994) Anaerobic fungi in herbivorous animals. Mycol Res 98:129–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Uyeno Y, Sekiguchi Y, Tajima K et al (2010) An rRNA-based analysis for evaluating the effect of heat stress on the rumen microbial composition of Holstein heifers. Anaerobe 16:27–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Williams AG, Orpin CG (1987) Polysaccharide-degrading enzymes formed by three species of anaerobic fungi grown on a range of carbohydrate substrates. Can J Microbiol 33:418–426

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams YJ, Popovski S, Rea SM et al (2009) A vaccine against rumen methanogens can alter the composition of archaeal populations. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:1860–1866

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wood TM, Wilson CA, McCrae SI et al (1986) A highly active extracellular cellulase from the anaerobic rumen fungus Neocallimastix frontalis. FEMS Microbiol Lett 34:37–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wubah DA, Fuller MS, Akin DE (1991) Studies on Caecomyces communis: morphology and development. Mycologia 83:303–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zoetendal EG, Collier CT, Koike S et al (2004) Molecular ecological analysis of the gastrointestinal microbiota: a review. J Nutr 134:465–472

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Yasunari Yamamoto (Mie Prefecture Livestock Research Institute, Mie Prefecture, Japan) for providing rumen fluid and Professor Kazuo Sakka (Graduate School of Mie University, Japan) for his instruction on real-time PCR. This study was supported by the Integrated Research for Developing Japanese-style Forage Feeding System to Increase Forage Self-Support Ratio of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries of Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroki Matsui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lwin, K.O., Hayakawa, M., Ban-Tokuda, T. et al. Real-Time PCR Assays for Monitoring Anaerobic Fungal Biomass and Population Size in the Rumen. Curr Microbiol 62, 1147–1151 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-010-9843-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-010-9843-7

Keywords

Navigation