Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Detection and Quantification of Citrobacter freundii and C. braakii by 5′-Nuclease Polymerase Chain Reaction

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new 5′-nuclease polymerase chain reaction (PCR) system for the detection and quantification of Citrobacter freundii and C. braakii was developed with primers and the probe oriented to a specific region of the cfa gene encoding a cyclopropane fatty acid synthase. The qualitative variant of the method consisted of a conventional PCR with end-point fluorimetry or agarose gel electrophoresis, and the quantitative variant used kinetic real-time PCR measurement. The PCR system was specific for C. freundii and C. braakii, detecting neither other Citrobacter spp. nor other enteric bacteria (Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, and others). The detection limit of the qualitative variant of the method was 103 cfu/mL when the amplification was followed by fluorimetry and 104 cfu/mL when the amplification was followed by gel electrophoresis. The real-time PCR variant of the method facilitated quantification over a range of concentrations from 102 to 108 cfu/mL, with Escherichia coli (106 cfu/mL) and Salmonella enterica (106 cfu/mL) having no effect on the quantification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Abolmaaty A, El-Shemy MG, Khallaf MF, Levin RE (1998) Effect of lysing methods and their variables on the yield of Escherichia coli O157: H7 DNA and its PCR amplification. J Microbiol Meth 34:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guarino A, Giannella R, Thompson MR (1989) Citrobacter freundii produces an 18-amino-acid heat-stable enterotoxin identical to the 18-amino-acid Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin (ST Ia). Infect Immun 57:649–652

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta R, Rauf SJ, Singh S, Smith J, Agraharkar ML (2003) Sepsis in a renal transplant recipient due to Citrobacter braakii. South Med J 96:796–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hodges GR, Degener CE, Barnes WG (1978) Clinical significance of Citrobacter isolates. Am J Clin Pathol 70:37–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li Y, Mustapha A (2004) Development of a polymerase chain reaction assay to detect enteric bacteria in ground beef. Food Microbiol 21:369–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rijpens NP, Herman LMF (2002) Molecular methods for identification and detection of bacterial food pathogens. J AOAC Int 85:984–995

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmidt H, Montag M, Bockemühl J, Heesemann J, Karch H (1993) Shiga-like toxin II-related cytotoxins in Citrobacter freundii strains from humans and beef samples. Infect Immun 61:534–543

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Štefanovičová A, Reháková H, Škarková A, Rijpens N, Kuchta T (1998) Confirmation of presumptive Salmonella colonies by the polymerase chain reaction. J Food Prot 61:1381–1383

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Urbanová E, Páčová Z (1997) Identification of Citrobacter species and their occurence in raw products and foods (in Czech). Vet Med (Praha) 42:87–91

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the Science and Technology Assistance Agency of the Slovak Republic, contract no. APVT-51-008902.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomáš Kuchta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaclíková, E., Krascsenicsová, K., Pangallo, D. et al. Detection and Quantification of Citrobacter freundii and C. braakii by 5′-Nuclease Polymerase Chain Reaction. Curr Microbiol 51, 229–232 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-005-4528-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-005-4528-3

Keywords

Navigation