Abstract
Purpose
Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is indicated for treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The QT interval, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity following the fractionated GO dosing regimen have not been previously assessed. This phase IV study was designed to obtain this information in patients with R/R AML.
Methods
Patients aged ≥ 18 years with R/R AML received the fractionated dosing regimen of GO 3 mg/m2 on Days 1, 4, and 7 of each cycle, up to 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc).
Results
Fifty patients received ≥ 1 dose of GO during Cycle 1. The upper limit of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval for least squares mean differences in QTc using Fridericia’s formula (QTcF) was < 10 ms for all time points during Cycle 1. No patients had a post-baseline QTcF > 480 ms or a change from baseline > 60 ms. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 98% of patients; 54% were grade 3–4. The most common grade 3–4 TEAEs were febrile neutropenia (36%) and thrombocytopenia (18%). The PK profiles of both conjugated and unconjugated calicheamicin mirror that of total hP67.6 antibody. The incidence of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) and neutralizing antibodies was 12% and 2%, respectively.
Conclusion
Fractionated GO dosing regimen (3 mg/m2/dose) is not predicted to pose a clinically significant safety risk for QT interval prolongation in patients with R/R AML. TEAEs are consistent with GO’s known safety profile, and ADA presence appears unassociated with potential safety issues.
Trial registry
Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT03727750 (November 1, 2018).
Introduction
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive malignancy characterized by rapid clonal expansion of undifferentiated myeloblasts, leading to anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia [1, 2]. It is clinically heterogeneous as a result of multitude chromosomal abnormalities and gene mutations, which translate to varied responses and survival following chemotherapy [3].
Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is a CD33-directed antibody–drug conjugate consisting of a monoclonal antibody targeting CD33 linked to a cytotoxic derivative of calicheamicin. GO binds to CD33, an antigen expressed on most AML blast cells. Once bound, the GO–CD33 complex is internalized, and the cytotoxic component is released intracellularly, leading to DNA damage and cell death [4].
GO is indicated in the United States for the treatment of newly diagnosed CD33-positive AML in adult and pediatric (≥ 1 month) patients, and for relapsed/refractory (R/R) CD33-positive AML in adult and pediatric (≥ 2 years) patients [5]. In the EU, GO is indicated for combination therapy with daunorubicin and cytarabine for the treatment of de novo CD33-positive AML (except acute promyelocytic leukemia) in patients aged ≥ 15 years [6].
The clinical efficacy of GO was originally established with 3 open-label, single-arm phase II studies of patients with AML in first relapse who received GO monotherapy consisting of 2 × 9 mg/m2 doses administered as 2-h intravenous infusions every 14 days [7]. While these studies showed a 26% response rate (13% complete response [CR] and 13% CR with incomplete platelet recovery [CRi]), they also showed a high rate of hematological and liver toxicities. Subsequent studies—ALFA-0701 [8] and MyloFrance-1 [9] in patients with CD33-positive AML in first relapse—demonstrated that fractionating the dose of GO (as 3 mg/m2 on Days 1, 4, and 7) can enhance its safety profile while maintaining efficacy. Importantly, the incidence of veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) was 5% of patients in ALFA-0701 and 0% in MyloFrance-1.
Consequently, GO is approved in a fractionated dose of 3 mg/m2 on Days 1, 4, and 7 [1, 10, 11]. However, the QT interval corrected for heart rate (QTc), pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity following the fractionated dosing regimen of GO has not been previously assessed, hence the need for this post-marketing study.
Materials and methods
Study design and patients
This was a single-arm, open-label, phase IV study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03727750) of GO monotherapy in adult (≥ 18 years) and pediatric (≥ 12–17 years) patients with R/R CD33-positive AML. This paper focuses on adults only. Key eligibility criteria included: initial peripheral white blood cell counts < 30 × 109/L; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2; and adequate renal and hepatic functions (see Supplementary methods in the Online Resource). Prior hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was not allowed if conducted ≤ 2 months prior to enrollment. Concomitant use of medications known to prolong the QT interval was not allowed. Patients provided written informed consent approved by study-site Institutional Review Boards. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Study treatment
Patients received a fractionated dosing regimen of GO 3 mg/m2 (up to 1 vial) on Days 1, 4, and 7 of Cycle 1 as a 2-h intravenous infusion after premedication. A second cycle of the same regimen was allowed at the investigator’s discretion for patients fulfilling specific criteria (see Supplementary methods in the Online Resource). Subsequent consolidation and/or HSCT could be considered at the investigator’s discretion, with ≥ 2 months between the last dose of GO and HSCT. Follow-up ended when a patient completed 12 months on the study, or death, whichever occurred first.
Study assessments
The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in QTc. Secondary endpoints included assessment of PK parameters, adverse events (AEs), incidence of antidrug antibodies (ADAs)/neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), overall survival (OS), and response rate (CR/CRi) (see Supplementary methods in the Online Resource). Triplicate electrocardiograms were performed at screening, baseline, and before serial PK draws on each day of dosing, using a 12-lead (with a 10-s rhythm strip) tracing. Response of remission status (CR/CRi) was evaluated after each treatment cycle, per European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 recommendations [12]. Survival status for each patient was collected for the duration of the study. VOD/SOS events, regardless of causality or severity, were reported as serious AEs. Blood samples were taken for PK sampling at various time points relative to GO dosing and were assayed for total hP67.6 antibody, conjugated calicheamicin, and unconjugated calicheamicin (see Supplementary methods in the Online Resource). Blood samples for the ADA assessment were collected at protocol-specified time points and analyzed using a validated, electro-chemiluminescent bridging assay. ADA-positive samples were evaluated for NAbs using a cell-based assay. This final analysis includes patients treated with GO after 12 months’ follow-up.
Results
Patient characteristics
Fifty-one adult patients (median [range] age of 67 [22–82] years) were enrolled in the study. Among enrolled patients, 27 (52.9%) had received 1 prior induction regimen; 11 (21.6%), 8 (15.7%), and 4 (7.8%) had received 2, 3, or > 3 prior induction regimens, respectively (see Supplementary Table 1 in the Online Resource). Five (9.8%) patients had received ≥ 1 allogeneic HSCT prior to GO treatment. There were 19 (37.3%) patients classified as adverse-risk according to the ELN 2017 recommendations [12]. Of 51 patients assigned to treatment, 50 (98.0%) received ≥ 1 dose of GO during Cycle 1 (safety analysis set), 46 (92.0%) patients received all doses in Cycle 1, and 9 (17.6%) received further doses in Cycle 2. After GO treatment, 18 (35.3%) patients went on to receive ≥ 1 further systemic treatment, and 2 (3.9%) patients went on to receive an allogeneic HSCT.
QT interval
The upper limit of the 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for least squares (LS) mean differences in QTc using Fridericia’s formula (QTcF) was < 10 ms for all time points during Cycle 1, including those on D4 and D7 assessed in the primary analysis (Fig. 1). The largest mean QTcF change from baseline was 5.10 ms (90% CI 2.2–8.1 ms). Most patients had a QTcF ≤ 450 ms (44/49, 89.8%) and a maximum increase from baseline of ≤ 30 ms (46/49, 93.9%). No patients had a post-baseline QTcF > 480 ms, and no patients had a change from baseline of > 60 ms.
Safety
All-causality, treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported in 49 (98.0%) patients, the most common being febrile neutropenia (40.0%) and thrombocytopenia (22.0%; Table 1). Serious TEAEs occurred in 34 (68.0%) patients. The most frequently reported were febrile neutropenia (22.0%), sepsis (14.0%), and disease progression (10.0%). Grade 3–4 TEAEs occurred in 27 (54.0%) patients, the most common being febrile neutropenia (36.0%), thrombocytopenia (18.0%), anemia (10.0%), and neutropenia (10.0%).
Seventeen (34.0%) patients had infections; 10 (20.0%) patients experienced grade 3–4 infections while 6 (12.0%) patients experienced grade 5 infections. Sixteen (32.0%) patients experienced hemorrhage; 2 (4.0%) patients experienced grade 3–4 hemorrhage, and no patients experienced grade 5 hemorrhage. The most-reported (≥ 10.0%) infectious TEAE was sepsis, occurring in 7 (14.0%) patients. The most-reported (≥ 5.0%) grade 3–4 infections were sepsis and pneumonia, in 3 (6.0%) patients each. The most-reported (≥ 5.0%) grade 5 infection was sepsis, in 4 (8.0%) patients. One (2.0%) patient experienced an infection (grade 3) that resulted in temporary discontinuation of GO and grade 4 sepsis that resulted in permanent discontinuation. Both infection and sepsis resulting in septicemia occurred simultaneously in the same patient; sepsis progressed, and the patient died. Both events were assessed as unrelated to GO by the investigator. The most-reported (≥ 10.0%) hemorrhage TEAE was epistaxis in 5 (10.0%) patients. One (2.0%) patient had grade 3 gastric hemorrhage and 1 (2.0%) patient had grade 4 traumatic intracranial hemorrhage. No hemorrhage resulted in permanent or temporary discontinuation of GO.
Three (6.0%) patients temporarily discontinued GO due to TEAEs, including increased alanine aminotransferase, increased transaminases, and infection, each in 1 (2.0%) patient. Two (4.0%) patients permanently discontinued GO due to TEAEs, including pyrexia and sepsis, each in 1 (2.0%) patient.
Grade 5 TEAEs occurred in 16 (32.0%) patients, of whom 5 (10.0%) died of disease progression and 4 (8.0%) died of sepsis. Multiple organ dysfunction, pyrexia, atypical pneumonia, COVID-19 pneumonia, AML (consistent with disease progression), respiratory failure, and capillary leak syndrome (CLS; detailed below) accounted for the deaths of the remaining patients.
One patient experienced grade 3 atrial fibrillation and supraventricular tachycardia, which were considered unrelated to GO. No patients experienced grade ≥ 4 cardiac conduction TEAEs. VOD/SOS was not reported; however, 1 patient experienced treatment-related grade 5 CLS associated with pleural effusion, ascites, hyperbilirubinemia, and endothelial syndrome.
A total of 43 (86.0%) patients experienced a shift from grade ≤ 2 at baseline to grade 3 or 4 post-baseline in hematology and coagulation laboratory parameters. The most common were decreased white blood cell count in 25/49 (51.0%) patients, decreased lymphocyte count in 24/49 (49.0%) patients, and anemia in 21/50 (42.0%) patients.
Pharmacokinetics
Following administration of multiple fractionated infusions of GO at 3 mg/m2 (Cycle 1, Day 7), exposures as measured by geometric mean area under the plasma concentration–time profile (AUC) from time zero to 336 h post-dose and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) were 461,500 pg h/mL and 11,740 pg/mL; 1639 pg h/mL and 58.8 pg/mL; and 26,820 ng h/mL and 585.6 ng/mL for conjugated calicheamicin, unconjugated calicheamicin, and hP67.6 antibody, respectively (see Supplementary Table 2 in the Online Resource). In general, the concentration–time profiles of conjugated calicheamicin and unconjugated calicheamicin are similar to that of total hP67.6 antibody for Cycle 1, Day 1 and Cycle 1, Day 7.
Immunogenicity
Of 50 patients treated with GO, 12 (24.0%) had positive ADAs against GO at baseline. This was likely due to pre-existing host antibodies that were cross-reactive with GO. There was no treatment-boosted ADA response.
Treatment-induced ADA was detected in 6 (12.0%) patients. No patients experienced anaphylaxis, hypersensitivity, or other clinical sequelae related to ADA. Among the 6 patients positive for treatment-induced ADA, 2 (33.3%) experienced an infusion-related reaction, both pyrexia (grade 1 and grade 3). Among the 44 patients negative for treatment-induced ADA, 7 (15.9%) patients experienced infusion-related reactions. All were grade 1 or 2, except for 1 instance of grade 3 urticaria.
Of the 18 patients who had positive ADAs against GO, none were positive for NAbs at baseline; therefore, no patients had a treatment-boosted response. Treatment-induced NAbs were detected in 1 (2.0%) patient.
Efficacy
The best overall response was CR in 2 (3.9% [95% CI 0.5–13.5]) patients and CRi in 3 (5.9% [95% CI 1.2–16.2]) patients (see Supplementary Table 3 in the Online Resource), with an overall rate of 9.8% (95% CI 3.3–21.4). CR + CRi was achieved by 3 (6.0%) of the 50 patients in Cycle 1. Nine of the 50 patients receiving Cycle 1 proceeded to Cycle 2, of whom 3 (33.3%) patients achieved CR + CRi in Cycle 2. Among the 5 patients who achieved CR or CRi (see Supplementary Table 3 in the Online Resource), there were 2 and 3 patients stratified with ELN favorable or intermediate risk, respectively. One patient who achieved CR/CRi had previously received 2 HSCTs, 1 had previously been treated with 3 induction regimens, and the remaining patients had received 1 or 2 prior induction regimens.
The median OS was 2.8 (95% CI 1.7–4.2) months, with 45 deaths reported (88.2%; see Supplementary Fig. 1 in the Online Resource). Of the 45 deaths, disease progression was the most common cause in 35 (77.8%) patients.
Discussion
This study showed that fractionated dosing of GO (3 mg/m2 on Days 1, 4, and 7) is not predicted to pose a clinically significant safety risk for QT interval prolongation in patients with R/R AML. The primary endpoint of post–baseline dose QTc was non-inferior to baseline, with the upper limit of the 2-sided 90% CI for the LS mean change from baseline falling below the 20 ms threshold of clinical concern for oncology drugs [13]. There were no patients with a maximum QTcF increase from baseline of > 60 ms and no patients had a QTcF > 480 ms. In addition, a population concentration–QT modelling analysis based on data from this study suggests that there is no observed relationship between GO concentrations (either unconjugated calicheamicin or total hp67.6 antibody) and QTc interval (data not shown) [14]. This compares with a larger study of another antibody–drug conjugate containing calicheamicin, inotuzumab ozogamicin, in patients with R/R B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) [15] that used pooled data from 3 trials (n = 2743 observations). Patients with R/R ALL received 1.8 mg/m2 per cycle in divided doses (considered therapeutic) and patients with R/R NHL received 1.8 mg/m2 per cycle as a single dose (considered supratherapeutic). Although the study revealed that QTc had a small but positive correlation with inotuzumab ozogamicin concentration, it was not predicted to pose a clinically significant safety risk for QT interval prolongation in patients with R/R ALL and NHL [15].
As part of a review of the PK for the prior marketing application of GO, a population PK model was used to simulate exposure for the fractionated GO regimen, based on 8 previous trials in patients with R/R AML or de novo AML [16]. The PK model predicted that, while the total dose of the fractionated dosing regimen is half that of the original dosing regimen (9 versus 18 mg/m2), total AUC of hP67.6 antibody over the course of treatment was 25%, and Cmax was 24% of the original dosing regimen. Since Cmax has been associated with risk of certain AEs (e.g., VOD/SOS, elevated bilirubin, elevated aspartate aminotransferase), the fractionated regimen was expected to have an improved safety profile versus the previously used regimen.
This current study enables comparison of the data from the simulated PK model with clinical PK data. The geometric mean AUC and Cmax of total antibody following the third dose from the current clinical study were 26,820 ng·h/mL and 586 ng/mL (open non-compartmental analysis) versus 27,997 ng·h/mL and 654 ng/mL (simulated PK), suggesting that the PK parameters were comparable between simulated and estimated approaches.
Safety data were consistent with the known safety profile of the fractionated regimen of GO [8, 9]. TEAEs leading to discontinuation of GO were reported in 4.0% of patients; however, no treatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation of GO were reported. Importantly, no incidences of VOD/SOS were reported during treatment or post-HSCT. However, 1 patient presented with CLS on Day 38, together with hypoalbuminemia and concomitant hyperbilirubinemia, findings that can be categorized in the VOD/SOS spectrum. Of note, few patients proceeded to HSCT after the study, making it difficult to estimate the frequency of post-HSCT VOD/SOS; therefore, some caution around the findings is warranted.
In this study, the incidence of ADAs and NAbs was 12% and 2%, respectively. None of the patients experienced anaphylaxis, hypersensitivity, or other clinical sequelae related to ADAs, suggesting that the presence of ADAs to GO did not appear to be associated with any potential safety issues following GO treatment.
A best overall response based on CR + CRi was achieved in 9.8% of patients, with a median OS of 2.8 months; both inferior than previously reported in the MyloFrance-1 study [9]. This is likely due to differences in baseline characteristics, since MyloFrance-1 excluded patients with prior HSCT and only included patients in first relapse.
In conclusion, this study showed that the effect of fractionated dosing of GO (3 mg/m2/dose) on QT interval prolongation is minimal in patients with R/R AML. TEAEs were consistent with the known safety profile for GO, and the presence of ADAs did not appear to be associated with any potential safety issues.
Data availability
Upon request, and subject to review, Pfizer will provide the data that support the findings of this study. Subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions, Pfizer may also provide access to the related individual de-identified participant data. See https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical-trials/trial-data-and-results for more information.
References
Ali S, Dunmore HM, Karres D, Hay JL, Salmonsson T, Gisselbrecht C, Sarac SB, Bjerrum OW, Hovgaard D, Barbachano Y (2019) The EMA review of mylotarg (gemtuzumab ozogamicin) for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Oncologist 24:e171–e179. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0025
Baron J, Wang ES (2018) Gemtuzumab ozogamicin for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 11:549–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2018.1478725
Kumar CC (2011) Genetic abnormalities and challenges in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Genes Cancer 2:95–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1947601911408076
Linenberger ML (2005) CD33-directed therapy with gemtuzumab ozogamicin in acute myeloid leukemia: progress in understanding cytotoxicity and potential mechanisms of drug resistance. Leukemia 19:176–182. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403598
Pfizer, Inc. (2017) MYLOTARGTM (gemtuzumab ozogamicin) for injection, for intravenous use, US highlights of prescribing information. US Food and Drug Administration. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/761060lbl.pdf. Accessed 27 Sep 2022
Pfizer, Inc. (2021) MYLOTARG summary of product characteristics. European Medicines Agency. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/mylotarg-epar-product-information_en.pdf. Accessed 27 Sep 2022
Larson RA, Sievers EL, Stadtmauer EA, Löwenberg B, Estey EH, Dombret H, Theobald M, Voliotis D, Bennett JM, Richie M, Leopold LH, Berger MS, Sherman ML, Loken MR, van Dongen JJ, Bernstein ID, Appelbaum FR (2005) Final report of the efficacy and safety of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg) in patients with CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia in first recurrence. Cancer 104:1442–1452. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21326
Castaigne S, Pautas C, Terré C, Raffoux E, Bordessoule D, Bastie JN, Legrand O, Thomas X, Turlure P, Reman O, de Revel T, Gastaud L, de Gunzburg N, Contentin N, Henry E, Marolleau JP, Aljijakli A, Rousselot P, Fenaux P, Preudhomme C, Chevret S, Dombret H (2012) Effect of gemtuzumab ozogamicin on survival of adult patients with de-novo acute myeloid leukaemia (ALFA-0701): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 379:1508–1516. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60485-1
Taksin AL, Legrand O, Raffoux E, de Revel T, Thomas X, Contentin N, Bouabdallah R, Pautas C, Turlure P, Reman O, Gardin C, Varet B, de Botton S, Pousset F, Farhat H, Chevret S, Dombret H, Castaigne S (2007) High efficacy and safety profile of fractionated doses of Mylotarg as induction therapy in patients with relapsed acute myeloblastic leukemia: a prospective study of the alfa group. Leukemia 21:66–71. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2404434
Jen EY, Ko C-W, Lee JE, Del Valle PL, Aydanian A, Jewell C, Norsworthy KJ, Przepiorka D, Nie L, Liu J (2018) FDA approval: gemtuzumab ozogamicin for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 24:3242–3246
Norsworthy KJ, Ko CW, Lee JE, Liu J, John CS, Przepiorka D, Farrell AT, Pazdur R (2018) FDA approval summary: mylotarg for treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia. Oncologist 23:1103–1108
Döhner H, Estey E, Grimwade D, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Büchner T, Dombret H, Ebert BL, Fenaux P, Larson RA, Levine RL, Lo-Coco F, Naoe T, Niederwieser D, Ossenkoppele GJ, Sanz M, Sierra J, Tallman MS, Tien HF, Wei AH, Löwenberg B, Bloomfield CD (2017) Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood 129:424–447. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-08-733196
ICH Expert Working Group (2005) ICH harmonised tripartite guideline—The clinical evaluation of QT/QTc interval prolongation and proaarhythmic potential for non-antiarrhythmic drugs E14. International Conference on Harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. https://www.database.ich.org/sites/default/files/E14_Guideline.pdf. Accessed 27 Sep 2022
Rashid J, Hibma J, Benner R, Bousset P, Vandendries E, Chen Y (2023) American society for slinical pharmacology and therapeutics PII-053 concentration-QT modeling analysis of gemtuzumab ozogamicin following fractionated dosing regimen inadult patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Pharmacol Ther 113:S5–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.2835.
Hibma JE, Kantarjian HM, DeAngelo DJ, Boni JP (2019) Effect of inotuzumab ozogamicin on the QT interval in patients with haematologic malignancies using QTc-concentration modelling. Br J Clin Pharmacol 85:590–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13832
US Food and Drug Administration (2017) FDA Briefing Document: Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting July 11, 2017—BLA 761060 Mylotarg (gemtuzumab ozogamicin). US Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/media/106500/download. Accessed 27 Sep 2022
Acknowledgements
This study was sponsored by Pfizer. The authors thank the patients and their families/caregivers, investigators, research nurses, study coordinators, and operations staff who contributed to this study. Medical writing support was provided by Simon Stones, PhD, of Engage Scientific Solutions, and was funded by Pfizer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Pau Montesinos has served as a consultant for Agios, Astellas, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Forma Therapeutics, Glycomimetics, and Tolero Pharmaceutical; has been an advisor for AbbVie, Astellas, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Incyte, Janssen, Karyopharm, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Teva; has received research funding from AbbVie, Astellas, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Karyopharm, Novartis, Pfizer, and Teva; and has participated in speakers bureau for AbbVie, Astellas, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Incyte, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Teva. Vamsi Kota has served as a consultant for Novartis and Pfizer; and has received research funding from Incyte. Joseph Brandwein has received honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, Jazz, Pfizer, Roche, and Taiho. Pierre Bousset, Rebecca J. Benner, Erik Vandendries, and Ying Chen are employees of Pfizer and own stock in Pfizer. Mary Frances McMullin has been an advisor for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, and Novartis; has received research funding from AOP Health and Bristol Myers Squibb; and has participated in speakers bureau for AOP Health and Novartis.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Montesinos, P., Kota, V., Brandwein, J. et al. A phase IV study evaluating QT interval, pharmacokinetics, and safety following fractionated dosing of gemtuzumab ozogamicin in patients with relapsed/refractory CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 91, 441–446 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04516-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04516-9