Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical pharmacokinetics and safety profile of single agent arsenic trioxide by continuous slow-rate infusion in patients with newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study evaluated pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety profiles of single agent arsenic trioxide (ATO, As2O3) administrated as continuous slow-rate infusion in patients with newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Patients and methods

Patients received 0.16 mg/kg ATO per day. ATO was given for 40 min infusion on the first day followed by 18–20 h daily at a very slow rate with infusion speed of 8 drips/min. During the first week, plasma samples were collected immediately before next administration on each day, and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 h after administration, at the end of infusion (18 h) on day 7. Total arsenic was determined by ICPMS. Arsenic species, arsenious acid (AsIII) and its metabolites, monomethylarsonic acid (MMAV) and dimethylarsinic acid (DMAV), were quantified by UHPLC-ICPMS. Safety assessment and PK analysis was conducted.

Results

Hyperleukocytosis occurred in two patients and no severe toxicity was observed. Total arsenic gradually accumulated from 15.84 to 34.12 ng/mL during the first week of therapy. MMAV/iAs increased and remained stable at value about 0.6 after day 4, while DMAV/MMAV declined under 2 after day 4. Compared with 2 h infusion, clearance (CL) of AsIII was significantly lower (0.8 ± 0.2 vs. 2.7 ± 1.7 L/kg/h, P = 0.002) while AUC0–t of AsIII was significantly increased (213.9 ± 38.6 vs. 82.6 ± 55.7 L/kg/h, P = 0.028).

Conclusion

Continuous slow-rate ATO infusion provided an alternative administration for ATO therapy with few toxic effects. Degree of methylation from MMA to DMA is inconsistent with that from iAs to MMA. PK of arsenic species is considered important for clinical use of ATO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang ZY, Chen Z (2008) Acute promyelocytic leukemia: from highly fatal to highly curable. Blood 111(5):2505–2515

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lo-Coco F et al (2010) Front-line treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia with AIDA induction followed by risk-adapted consolidation for adults younger than 61 years: results of the AIDA-2000 trial of the GIMEMA Group. Blood 116(17):3171–3179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanz MA et al (2010) Risk-adapted treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia based on all-trans retinoic acid and anthracycline with addition of cytarabine in consolidation therapy for high-risk patients: further improvements in treatment outcome. Blood 115(25):5137–5146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Melnick A, Licht JD (1999) Deconstructing a disease: RARalpha, its fusion partners, and their roles in the pathogenesis of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood 93(10):3167–3215

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Soignet SL et al (2001) United States multicenter study of arsenic trioxide in relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 19(18):3852–3860

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Powell BL et al (2010) Arsenic trioxide improves event-free and overall survival for adults with acute promyelocytic leukemia: North American Leukemia Intergroup Study C9710. Blood 116(19):3751–3757

  7. Mathews V et al (2010) Single-agent arsenic trioxide in the treatment of newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia: long-term follow-up data. J Clin Oncol 28(24):3866–3871

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghavamzadeh et al (2006) Treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia with arsenic trioxide without ATRA and/or chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 17(1):131–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lengfelder E, Hofmann WK, Nowak D (2012) Impact of arsenic trioxide in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Leukemia 26(3):433–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghavamzadeh A et al (2011) Phase II study of single-agent arsenic trioxide for the front-line therapy of acute promyelocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 29(20):2753–2757

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen GQ et al (1997) Use of arsenic trioxide (As2O3) in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL): I. As2O3 exerts dose-dependent dual effects on APL cells. Blood 89(9):3345–3353

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hall MN, Gamble MV (2012) Nutritional manipulation of one-carbon metabolism: effects on arsenic methylation and toxicity. J Toxicol 2012:595307

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kitchin KT (2001) Recent advances in arsenic carcinogenesis: modes of action, animal model systems, and methylated arsenic metabolites. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 172(3):249–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Aposhian HV, Zakharyan RA, Avram MD, Sampayo-Reyes A, Wollenberg ML (2004) A review of the enzymology of arsenic metabolism and a new potential role of hydrogen peroxide in the detoxication of the trivalent arsenic species. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 198(3):327–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Z, Zhou J, Lu X, Gong Z, Le XC (2004) Arsenic speciation in urine from acute promyelocytic leukemia patients undergoing arsenic trioxide treatment. Chem Res Toxicol 17(1):95–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kenyon EM, Del Razo LM, Hughes MF (2005) Tissue distribution and urinary excretion of inorganic arsenic and its methylated metabolites in mice following acute oral administration of arsenate. Toxicol Sci 85(1):468–475

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Roboz GJ et al (2014) Prevalence, management, and clinical consequences of QT interval prolongation during treatment with arsenic trioxide. J Clin Oncol 32(33):3723–3728

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shen Y et al (2001) Studies on the clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of low-dose arsenic trioxide in the treatment of relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia: a comparison with conventional dosage. Leukemia 15(5):735–741

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (2006) Common terminology criteria for adverse events v3.0 (CTCAE). DCTD, NCI

  20. Frankel SR et al (1992) The “retinoic acid syndrome” in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Ann Intern Med 117(4):292–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoshino Y et al (2009) Speciation of arsenic trioxide metabolites in blood cells and plasma of a patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia. Anal Bioanal Chem 393(2):689–697

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fujisawa S et al (2007) Pharmacokinetics of arsenic species in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with arsenic trioxide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 59(4):485–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Montesinos P et al (2009) Differentiation syndrome in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia treated with all-trans retinoic acid and anthracycline chemotherapy: characteristics, outcome, and prognostic factors. Blood 113(4):775–783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shen ZX et al (1997) Use of arsenic trioxide (As2O3) in the treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL): II. Clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics in relapsed patients. Blood 89(9):3354–3360

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen GQ et al (2003) Methylated metabolites of arsenic trioxide are more potent than arsenic trioxide as apoptotic but not differentiation inducers in leukemia and lymphoma cells. Cancer Res 63(8):1853–1859

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mathews V et al (2006) Hepatotoxicity profile of single agent arsenic trioxide in the treatment of newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia, its impact on clinical outcome and the effect of genetic polymorphisms on the incidence of hepatotoxicity. Leukemia 20(5):881–883

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81430088 and 81700151).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xin Hai or Jin Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, C., Hu, S., Guo, M. et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics and safety profile of single agent arsenic trioxide by continuous slow-rate infusion in patients with newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 82, 229–236 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-018-3606-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-018-3606-8

Keywords

Navigation