Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Capecitabine with/without mitomycin C: results of a randomized phase II trial of second-line therapy in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma (BTA) is a rare tumor with a poor prognosis. Since no standard salvage chemotherapy regimen exists, we explored the activity of capecitabine alone or combined with mitomycin C.

Methods

Patients aged 18–75 years and with KPS >50, with pathological diagnosis of BTA stratified based on site and stage of disease, were randomized to receive capecitabine 2000 mg/m2 day 1–14 alone (ARM A) or in combination with mitomycin C 6 mg/m2 day 1 (ARM B) as second-line therapy. Cycles were repeated in both arms every 3 weeks. Tumor assessment was performed every 2 months. The primary endpoint was the probability of being progression free at 6 months (PFS-6) from treatment start. According to the Fleming design, the study aimed to enroll 26 pts per arm. An exploratory endpoint was to assess thymidylate synthase (TS) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) expression, as biomarkers predictive for clinical outcomes of capecitabine treatment.

Results

Between October 2011 and 2013, 57 metastatic pts were enrolled: ARM A/B 28/29. Accordingly, 55 (26/29) pts were assessable for the primary endpoint: 2 (8 %) ARM A and 3 (10 %) ARM B pts were PFS-6. Main G3-4 toxicities were: hand-foot syndrome and transaminitis in 4/0 %, and thrombocytopenia, diarrhea and fatigue in 0/3 % of pts. No statistically significant correlation was found between TS or TP expression and pts’ outcome.

Conclusions

Since capecitabine yielded a disappointing outcome and the addition of mitomycin C did not improve the results, new therapeutic strategies need to be explored to improve survival in this disease setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glimelius B, Hoffman K, Sjoden PO (1996) Chemotherapy improves survival and quality of life in advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer. Ann Oncol 7:593–600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma AB, Dwary AD, Mohanti BK et al (2010) Best supportive care compared with chemotherapy for unresectable gall bladder cancer: a randomized controlled study. J Clin Oncol 28:4581–4586

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Valle J, Wasan HS, Palmer DH et al (2010) Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med 362:1273–1281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Marino D, Leone F, Cavalloni G, Cagnazzo C, Aglietta M (2013) Biliary tract carcinomas: from chemotherapy to targeted therapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 85:136–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kornek GV, Schuell B, Laengle F et al (2004) Mitomycin C in combination with capecitabine or biweekly high-dose gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a randomised phase II trial. Ann Oncol 15:478–483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Taal BG, Audisio RA, Bleiberg H et al (1991) Phase II trial of mitomycin C (MMC) in advanced gallbladder and biliary tree carcinoma: an EORTC gastrointestinal tract cancer cooperative group. Ann Oncol 4:607–612

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crooke ST, Bradner WT (1976) Mitomycin C: a review. Cancer Treat Rev 3:121–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Von Eyben F, Hellekant C, Matsson W et al (1980) Mitomycin C in advanced gallbladder carcinoma. Oncology 19:81–84

    Google Scholar 

  9. Patt YZ, Hassan MM, Aguayo A et al (2004) Oral capecitabine for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder carcinoma. Cancer 10:578–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gennatas C, Michalaki V, Gennatas S (2009) The role of capecitabine in the management of tumors of the digestive system. Rev Recent Clin Trials 4:1–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sawada N, Ishikawa T, Fukase Y et al (1998) Induction of thymidine phosphorylase activity and enhancement of capecitabine efficacy by taxol/taxotere in human cancer xenografts. Clin Cancer Res 4:1013–1019

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Saeki T, Takashima S (1999) Mechanism and possible biochemical modulation of capecitabine (Xeloda), a newly generated oral fluoropyrimidine. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 26:447–455

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2004) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 Published: May 28, 2009 (v4.03: June 14, 2010)

  15. Fleming TR (1982) One-sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials. Biometrics 38:143–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee S, Park YH, Kim KH et al (2010) Thymidine synthase, thymidine phosphorylase, and excision repair cross-complementation group 1 expression as predictive markers of capecitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 103:845–851

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Mirza A, Brown M, McNulty C et al (2013) A pilot study to investigate the role of thymidylate synthase as a marker of prognosis for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2013:502153. doi:10.1155/2013/502153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen CY, Chang YL, Shih JY et al (2011) Thymidylate synthase and dihydrofolate reductase expression in non-small cell lung carcinoma: the association with treatment efficacy of pemetrexed. Lung Cancer 74:132–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cereda S, Belli C, Rognone A, Mazza E, Reni M (2013) Second-line therapy in advanced biliary tract cancer: what should be the standard? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 88:368–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brandi G, Di Girolamo S, De Rosa F et al (2011) Second-line chemotherapy in patients with biliary tract cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:e14590

    Google Scholar 

  21. Roth A, Schleyer E, Schoppmeyer K et al (2011) Imatinib mesylate for palliative second-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer: a bicentric phase II study. Onkologie 34:469–470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Buzzoni R, Pusceddu S, Bajetta E et al (2014) Activity and safety of RAD001 (everolimus) in patients affected by biliary tract cancer progressing after prior chemotherapy: a phase II ITMO study. Ann Oncol 25:1597–1603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. La Marca A, Hubner RA, Ryder WD, Valle JW (2014) Second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 25:2328–2338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fornaro L, Vivaldi C, Brandi G et al (2015) Outcome of second-line chemotherapy (CT2) after first-line CT (CT1) with platinum plus gemcitabine in advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC): is it worthwhile? Ann Oncol 26 (suppl 4): iv42 (P-147) doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv233.147

  25. Aschele C, Debernardis D, Casazza S et al (1999) Immunohistochemical quantification of thymidylate synthase expression in colorectal cancer metastases predicts for clinical outcome to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 17:1760–1770

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cascinu S, Aschele C, Barni S et al (1999) Thymidylate synthase protein expression in advanced colon cancer: correlation with the site of metastasis and the clinical response to leucovorin-modulated bolus 5-fluorouracil. Clin Cancer Res 5:1996–1999

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Johnston PG, Mick R, Recant W et al (1997) Thymidylate synthase expression and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced head and neck cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:308–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tominaga T, Toi M, Ohashi Y, Abe O (2002) Prognostic and predictive value of thymidine phosphorylase activity in early stage breast cancer patients. Clin Breast Cancer 3:55–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Aschele C, Debernardis D, Bandelloni R et al (2002) Thymidylate synthase protein expression in colorectal cancer metastases predicts for clinical outcome to leucovorin modulated bolus or infusional 5-fluorouracil but not methotrexate-modulated bolus 5- fluorouracil. Ann Oncol 13:1882–1892

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsuda H, Akiyama F, Kurosumi M, Sakamoto G (2004) Reproducible immunohistochemical criteria based on multiple raters’ judgements for expression of Thymidine phosphorylase in breast cancer tissue. Breast Cancer Res Treat 86:215–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Andreetta C, Puppin C, Minisini A et al (2009) Thymidine phosphorylase expression and benefit from capecitabine in patients with advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 20:265–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee SJ, Choi YL, Park YH et al (2011) Thymidylate synthase and Thymidine phosphorylase as predictive markers of capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 68:743–751

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim KW, Kwon H-C, Kim S-H et al (2013) Prognostic significance of thymidylate synthase, thymidine phosphorylase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression in biliary tract cancer patients receiving adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Mol Clin Oncol 1:987–994

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Nishi M, Shimada M, Utsunomiya T et al (2011) Role of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidylate synthase expression in immunohistochemistry of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatol Res 41:64–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fornaro L, Cereda S, Aprile G et al (2014) Multivariate prognostic factors analysis for second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer. Br J Cancer 110:2165–2169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

An unrestricted Grant of Rete Oncologica Lombarda (ROL)—Regione Lombardia—supported this trial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Cereda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No author has conflict of interest related to the submitted paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cereda, S., Milella, M., Cordio, S. et al. Capecitabine with/without mitomycin C: results of a randomized phase II trial of second-line therapy in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 77, 109–114 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-015-2919-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-015-2919-0

Keywords

Navigation