Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimization of patient selection for EGFR-TKIs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer by combined analysis of KRAS, PIK3CA, MET, and non-sensitizing EGFR mutations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We present a comprehensive analysis of KRAS, PIK3CA, MET, and non-sensitizing EGFR mutations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with the aim of clarifying the relative contribution of these molecular alterations to resistance.

Patients and methods

One hundred and sixty-six patients with advanced NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKIs with available archival tissue specimens were included. EGFR (exons 18–21), KRAS (exons 2, 3), PIK3CA (exons 9, 20), and MET (exons 14, 15) mutations were analyzed using PCR-based sequencing. Among all the mutations evaluated, only KRAS, PIK3CA, MET, and non-sensitizing EGFR mutations, defined as “TKI non-sensitizing mutations” were used for response, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) analysis.

Results

TKI non-sensitizing mutations were associated with disease progression (p = 0.001), shorter TTP (p < 0.0001), and worse OS (p = 0.03). Cox’s multivariate analysis including histology and performance status showed that TKI non-sensitizing mutations were independent factors for shorter TTP (p < 0.0001) and worse OS (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

When KRAS, PIK3CA, MET, and non-sensitizing EGFR mutations are concomitant, up to 96.0% of NSCLC patients unlikely to respond to TKIs can be identified, and they represented independent negative prognostic factors. Comprehensive molecular dissection of EGFR signaling pathways should be considered to select advanced NSCLC patients for TKIs therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schiller JH, Harrington D, Belani CP et al (2002) Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 346:92–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Scagliotti GV, De Marinis F, Rinaldi M et al (2002) Phase III randomized trial comparing three platinum-based doublets in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:4285–4291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mendelsohn J, Baselga J (2003) Status of epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in the biology and treatment of cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:2787–2799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fukuoka M, Yano S, Giaccone G et al (2003) Multi-institutional randomized phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (the IDEAL 1 Trial). J Clin Oncol 21:2237–2246 (Erratum, J Clin Oncol 2004;22:4811)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kris MG, Natale RB, Herbst RS et al (2003) Efficacy of gefitinib, an inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in symptomatic patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 290:2149–2158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Perez-Soler R, Chachoua A, Hammond LA et al (2004) Determinants of tumor response and survival with erlotinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:3238–3247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller VA, Kris MG, Shah N et al (2004) Bronchioloalveolar pathologic subtype and smoking history predict sensitivity to gefitinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:1103–1109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sharma SV, Bell DW, Settleman J, Haber DA (2007) Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 7:169–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Greulich H, Chen TH, Feng W, Jänne PA, Alvarez JV, Zappaterra M et al (2005) Oncogenic transformation by inhibitor-sensitive and-resistant EGFR mutants. PLoS Med 2:e313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pao W, Wang TY, Riely GJ et al (2005) KRAS mutations and primary resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib. PLoSMed 2:e17

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tam IY, Chung LP, Suen WS et al (2006) Distinct epidermal growth factor receptor and KRAS mutation patterns in non-small cell lung cancer patients with different tobacco exposure and clinicopathologic features. Clin Cancer Res 12:1647–1653

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eberhard DA, Johnson BE, Amler LC et al (2005) Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor and in KRAS are predictive and prognostic indicators in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy alone and in combination with erlotinib. J Clin Oncol 23:5900–5909

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Taron M, Ichinose Y, Rosell R et al (2005) Activating mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain in the EGFR are associated with improved survival in Gefitinib-treated chemorefractory lung adenocarcinomas. Clin Can Res 11:5878–5885

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R et al (2004) Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of NSCLC to Gefitinib. N Engl J Med 350:2129–2139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Paez JG, Jänne PA, Lee JC et al (1999) EGFR mutations in lung with resected stage I and II non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:668–675

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cortes-Funes H, Gomez C, Rosell R et al (2005) Epidermal growth factor receptor activating mutations in Spanish gefitinib-treated non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Ann Oncol 16:1081–1086

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Han SW, Kim TY, Hwang PG et al (2005) Predictive and prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib. J Clin Oncol 23:2493–2501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitsudomi T, Kosaka T, Endoh H et al (2005) Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene predict prolonged survival after gefitinib treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with postoperative recurrence. J Clin Oncol 23:2513–2520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Takano T, Ohe Y, Sakamoto H et al (2005) Epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations and increased copy numbers predict gefitinib sensitivity in patients with recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:6829–6837

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kang S, Bader AG, Vogt PK et al (2005) Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase mutations identified in human cancer are oncogenic. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:802–807

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ludovini V, Bianconi F, Pistola L et al (2011) Phosphoinositide-3-kinase catalytic alpha and KRAS mutations are important predictors of resistance to therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 6(3):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lim EH, Zhang SL, Li JL et al (2009) Using whole genome amplification (WGA) of low-volume biopsies to assess the prognostic role of EGFR, KRAS, P53, MET mutations in advanced stage NSCLC. JTO 4(1):12–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5:649–655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Müller-Hermelink HK, Harris CC (2004) World health organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of lung, pleura, thymus and heart. IARC Press, Lyon

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hirsch FR, Varella-Garcia M, Bunn PA Jr et al (2006) Molecular predictors of outcome with gefitinib in a phase III placebo-controlled study in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:5034–5042

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sasaki H, Shimizu S, Endo K et al (2006) EGFR and erbB2 mutation status in Japanese lung cancer patients. Int J Cancer 118:180–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mok T, Wu YL, Thongprasert S et al (2009) Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Eng J Med 361(10):947–957

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Inoue A, Kobayashi K, Usui K et al (2009) North East Japan Gefitinib Study Group. First-line gefitinib for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations without indication for chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 27(9):1394–1400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee JS, Park K, Kim SW et al (2009) A randomized phase III study of gefitinib versus standard chemotherapy (gemcitabine plus cisplatin) as a first-line treatment for never-smokers with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung. J Thorac Oncol 4(suppl):S283

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kim HJ, Lee KY, Kim YC et al (2011) Detection and comparison of peptide nucleic acid-mediated real-time polymerase chain reaction clamping and direct gene sequencing for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 17 Sep 2011 [Epub ahead of print]

Download references

Acknowledgments

Supported by a grant from the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) and from the Umbria Association Against Cancer (AUCC). The authors thank the patients who participated in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Ludovini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ludovini, V., Bianconi, F., Pistola, L. et al. Optimization of patient selection for EGFR-TKIs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer by combined analysis of KRAS, PIK3CA, MET, and non-sensitizing EGFR mutations. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 69, 1289–1299 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-012-1829-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-012-1829-7

Keywords

Navigation