Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of gastric cancer patients with isolated para-aortic lymph node involvement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although gastric cancer with isolated para-aortic lymph node (PAN) involvement is considered an advanced disease, the clinical characteristics of it have not been comprehensively elucidated.

Patients and methods

We reviewed the medical records of 1,277 patients received palliative chemotherapy with advanced gastric cancer according to metastatic sites: PAN-only metastasis, single organ metastasis other than PAN, and multiple organ metastasis. Time to other organ metastasis (TTOM) was determined only in PAN-only metastasis group as the time interval between initial diagnosis of recurrence or de novo metastasis and confirming distant metastasis beyond PAN area.

Results

The median overall survival (OS) of patients with PAN-only metastasis was significantly longer than that of patients with single organ metastasis other than PAN or multiple organ metastasis (13.8 months vs. 11.4 months vs. 8.4 months; P < 0.001). In the PAN-only metastasis group, patients with recurrent diseases showed longer TTOM beyond the PAN area (10.7 vs. 7.7 months; P = 0.037) and OS (23.8 vs. 12.8 months; P = 0.010) than those with de novo metastatic disease and it was validated by multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Patients with isolated PAN metastasis showed an excellent prognosis compared with patients with metastasis at other sites and it was primarily evident in patients with recurrent PAN metastasis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hohenberger P, Gretschel S (2003) Gastric cancer. Lancet 362:305–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shin HR, Ahn YO, Bae JM, Shin MH, Lee DH, Lee CW et al (2002) Cancer incidence in Korea. Cancer Res Treat 34:405–408

    Google Scholar 

  3. D’Angelica M, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Turnbull AD, Bains M, Karpeh MS (2004) Patterns of initial recurrence in completely resected gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 240:808–816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoo CH, Noh SH, Shin DW, Choi SH, Min JS (2000) Recurrence following curative resection for gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg 87:236–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Patel PR, Yao JC, Hess K, Schnirer I, Rashid A, Ajani JA (2007) Effect of timing of metastasis/disease recurrence and histologic differentiation on survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Cancer 110:2186–2190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Takashima S, Kosaka T (2005) Results and controversial issues regarding a para-aortic lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Today 35:425–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yonemura Y, Wu CC, Fukushima N, Honda I, Bandou E, Kawamura T et al (2008) Randomized clinical trial of D2 and extended paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 13:132–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S, Kurokawa Y, Nashimoro A, Kurita A et al (2008) D2 lymphadenectomy alone or with para-aortic nodal dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med 359:453–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakane Y, Okamura S, Masuya Y, Okumura S, Akehira K, Hioki K (1998) Incidence and prognosis of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 45:1901–1906

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Isozaki H, Okajima K, Fujii K, Nomura E, Izumi N, Mabuchi H et al (1999) Effectiveness of paraaortic lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 46:549–554

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee JH, Paik YH, Lee JS, Song HJ, Ryu KW, Kim CG et al (2006) Candidates for curative resection in advanced gastric cancer patients who had equivocal para-aortic lymph node metastasis on computed tomographic scan. Ann Surg Oncol 13:1163–1167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (1998) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma—2nd English Edition. Gastric Cancer 1:10–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kudo R, Ebihara S, Fujii M, Kaneko A, Noguchi S, Uchida A et al (2003) Classification of regional lymph nodes in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 8:248–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92: 205–216

  15. Kim JG, Ryoo BY, Park YH, Kim BS, Kim TY, Im YH et al (2008) Prognostic factors for survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 61:301–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fuse N, Fukuda H, Yamada Y, Sawaki A, Koizumi W, Suzuki Y et al (2009) Updated results of randomized phase III study of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) alone versus combination of irinotecan and cisplatin (CP) versus S-1 alone in advanced gastric cancer (JCOG 9912). J Clin Oncol 27:4514

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pozzo C, Ohashi Y, On behalf of the GASTRIC (2009) Meta-analyses of randomized trials assessing the influence of chemotherapy and prognostic factor in advanced/recurrent gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:4550

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lee SS, Lee JL, Ryu MH, Chang HM, Kim TW, Kang HJ et al (2007) Combination chemotherapy with capecitabine (X) and Cisplatin (P) as first line treatment in advanced gastric cancer: experience of 223 patients with prognostic factor analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol 37:30–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Park SH, Lee WK, Chung M, Bang SM, Cho EK, Lee JH et al (2006) Quality of life in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with second-line chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 57:289–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee J, Lim T, Uhm JE, Park KW, Park SH, Lee SC et al (2007) Prognostic model to predict survival following first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol 18:886–891

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chau I, Norman AR, Cunningham D, Waters JS, Oates J, Ross PJ (2004) Multivariate prognostic factor analysis in locally advanced and metastatic esophago-gastric cancer-pooled analysis from three multicenter, randomized, controlled trials using individual patient data. J Clin Oncol 22:2395–2403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sun J, Sun YH, Zeng ZC, Qin XY, Zeng MS, Chen B et al (2009) Consideration of the role of radiotherapy for abdominal lymph node metastases in patients with recurrent gastric cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys (Epub ahead)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grant 0710650 from the Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sook Ryun Park.

Additional information

I.H. Park and S.Y. Kim contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, I.H., Kim, S.Y., Kim, YW. et al. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of gastric cancer patients with isolated para-aortic lymph node involvement. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 67, 127–136 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-010-1296-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-010-1296-y

Keywords

Navigation