Skip to main content
Log in

Phase II study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine as radiosensitizer for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme

  • Clinical Trial Report
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In order to evaluate the activity of gemcitabine as radiosensitizer for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), a prospective single-center phase II study was conducted.

Methods

Eligible patients were required to have histologically proven GBM with evaluable and/or measurable disease after surgery. They were treated by standard cranial irradiation plus concomitant fixed dose rate gemcitabine given intravenously at 175 mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks. After chemo-radiotherapy, irrespective of tumor response, patients went on to receive oral temozolomide at 150–200 mg/m2 for 5 days every 28 days.

Results

Twenty-three patients were enrolled. Median age was 57 years (range 43–72) and median Karnofsky performance status was 90 (range 70–100). Seventeen patients had received subtotal resection of the tumor, while six patients had biopsied-only tumors. Four patients responded to treatment (17.5%) with additional 14 (61%) experiencing stable disease for an overall disease control rate of 78.5%. Median progression-free and overall survival were 6.8 and 10.1 months, respectively. The concomitant radiotherapy–gemcitabine combination was well tolerated and severe adverse events were rare, consisting of grade 3 neutropenia and hypertransaminasemia in two cases each. Twenty patients were assessable for methylguanine methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, 11 of which were found methylated. In the methylated and unmethylated cohorts, disease control was obtained in 10/11 patients (91%) and 7/9 patients (77.5%), respectively.

Conclusions

Concomitant radiotherapy–gemcitabine is active and well tolerated in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. Activity is observed both in tumors with methylated and unmethylated MGMT promoter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van Nifterik KA, van den Berg J, Stalpers LJ et al (2007) Differential radiosensitizing potential of temozolomide in MGMT promoter methylated glioblastoma multiforme cell lines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69:1246–1253

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T et al (2005) MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:997–1003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shewach DS, Lawrence TS (2007) Antimetabolite radiosensitizers. J Clin Oncol 25:4043–4050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pauwels B, Korst AE, Lardon F, Vermorken JB (2005) Combined modality therapy of gemcitabine and radiation. Oncologist 10:34–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Toschi L, Finocchiaro G, Bartolini S et al (2005) Role of gemcitabine in cancer therapy. Future Oncol 1:7–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lund B, Kristjansen PE, Hansen HH (1993) Clinical and preclinical activity of 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine). Cancer Treat Rev 19:45–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abbruzzese JL, Grunewald R, Weeks EA et al (1991) A phase I clinical, plasma, and cellular pharmacology study of gemcitabine. J Clin Oncol 9:491–498

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grunewald R, Kantarjian H, Keating MJ et al (1990) Pharmacologically directed design of the dose rate and schedule of 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine (Gemcitabine) administration in leukemia. Cancer Res 50:6823–6826

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tempero M, Plunkett W, Ruiz Van Haperen V et al (2003) Randomized phase II comparison of dose-intense gemcitabine: thirty-minute infusion and fixed dose rate infusion in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 21:3402–3408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ceribelli A, Gridelli C, De Marinis F et al (2003) Prolonged gemcitabine infusion in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: a randomized phase II study of two different schedules in combination with cisplatin. Cancer 98:337–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fabi A, Mirri A, Felici A et al (2008) Fixed dose-rate gemcitabine as radiosensitizer for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a dose-finding study. J Neurooncol 87:79–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Macdonald DR, Cascino TL, Schold SC Jr, Cairncross JG (1990) Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 8:1277–1280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE). Available at: http://ctep.cancer.gov (Last Accessed 1 July 2009)

  15. A’Hern RP (2001) Sample size tables for exact single-stage phase II designs. Stat Med 20:859–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Athanassiou H, Synodinou M, Maragoudakis E et al (2005) Randomized phase II study of temozolomide and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol 23:2372–2377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Beauchesne PD, Taillandier L, Bernier V, Carnin C (2009) Concurrent radiotherapy: fotemustine combination for newly diagnosed malignant glioma patients, a phase II study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 64:171–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stupp R, Dietrich PY, Ostermann Kraljevic S (2002) Promising survival for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme treated with concomitant radiation plus temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide. J Clin Oncol 20:1375–1382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sigmond J, Honeywell RJ, Postma TJ et al (2009) Gemcitabine uptake in glioblastoma multiforme: potential as a radiosensitizer. Ann Oncol 20:182–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maraveyas A, Sgouros J, Upadhyay S et al (2005) Gemcitabine twice weekly as a radiosensitiser for the treatment of brain metastases in patients with carcinoma: a phase I study. Br J Cancer 92:815–819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brandes AA, Tosoni A, Franceschi E et al (2009) Fotemustine as second-line treatment for recurrent or progressive glioblastoma after concomitant and/or adjuvant temozolomide: a phase II trial of Gruppo Italiano Cooperativo di Neuro-Oncologia (GICNO). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. doi:10.1007/s00280-009-0926-8

  22. Fabi A, Metro G, Russillo M et al (2009) Treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas with fotemustine monotherapy: impact of dose and correlation with MGMT promoter methylation. BMC Cancer 31(9):101

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Fabi.

Additional information

G. Metro and A. Fabi contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Metro, G., Fabi, A., Mirri, M.A. et al. Phase II study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine as radiosensitizer for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 65, 391–397 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-1155-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-1155-x

Keywords

Navigation