Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

To widen the setting of cancer patients who could benefit from metronomic capecitabine

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We investigated the efficacy and toxicity of metronomic capecitabine administered at a fixed dose of 1,000 mg daily in three elderly or poor performance status patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) and gastric cancer.

Methods

In this study a pretreated advanced CRC patient (patient 1), a not previously treated advanced gastric cancer patient (patient 2), and a not previously treated advanced rectal cancer patient (patient 3) were given metronomic capecitabine administered at a fixed dose of 1,000 mg daily (day 1–28 continuously). The efficacy was evaluated every 3 months by instrumental evaluation and the treatment was continued until progression of disease or toxicity.

Results

A stable disease was observed in all three patients. The duration of treatment was above 3 months and no major toxicities occurred.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that metronomic capecitabine may be considered a safe and valid treatment option for advanced CRC and gastric cancer patients, both after failure of previous lines of chemotherapy or in front-line when standard chemotherapy is contraindicated, especially when the aim of medical treatment is to achieve disease control and to arrest tumour growth without affecting the patient’s quality of life. Nevertheless, further clinical studies, as well as a greater clinical experience are required in order to better define the role of this strategy in medical oncology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Miwa M, Ura M, Nishida M et al (1998) Design of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, capecitabine, which generates 5-fluorouracil selectively in tumours by enzymes concentrated in human liver and cancer tissue. Eur J Cancer 34:1274–1281

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Twelves C, Wong A, Nowacki MP et al (2005) Capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer. N Engl J Med 352:2696–2704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G et al (2001) Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:2282–2292

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Cutsem E, Hoff PM, Harper P et al (2004) Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-flourouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, radomised, phase III trials. Br J Cancer 90:1190–1197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Reichardt P, Von Minckwitz G, Thuss-Patience PC et al (2003) Multicenter phase II study of oral capecitabine (Xeloda) in patients with metastatic breast cancer relapsing after treatment with a taxane-containing therapy. Ann Oncol 14:1227–1233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fumoleau P, Largillier R, Clippe C et al (2004) Multicentre, phase II study evaluating capecitabine monotherapy in patients with anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 40:536–542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hong YS, Song SY, Lee SI et al (2004) A phase II trial of capecitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced and/or metastatic gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 15:1344–1347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boeck S, Wilkowski R, Bruns CJ et al (2007) Oral capecitabine in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Oncology 73:221–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kerbel RS, Kamen BA (2004) The anti-angiogenic basis of metronomic chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 4:423–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Steinbild S, Arends J, Medinger M et al (2007) Metronomic antiangiogenic therapy with capecitabine and celecoxib in advanced tumor patients—results of a phase II study. Onkologie 30:629–635

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lokich J (2004) Capecitabine: fixed daily dose and continuous (noncyclic) dosing schedule. Cancer Invest 22:713–717

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dellapasqua S, Bertolini F, Bagnardi V et al (2008) Metronomic cyclophosphamide and capecitabine combined with bevacizumab in advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:4899–4905

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Loven D, Be’ery E, Yerushalmi R et al (2008) Daily low-dose/continuous capecitabine combined with neo-adjuvant irradiation reduces VEGF and PDGF-BB levels in rectal carcinoma patients. Acta Oncol 47:104–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Petrioli R, Pascucci A, Francini E, Marsili S, Fiaschi AI, Civitelli S, Tanzini G, Battistelli S, Lorenzi M, Roviello F, Francini G, Multidisciplinary Oncology Group on Gastrointestinal Tumors (2008) Continuous oral capecitabine at fixed dose in patients older than 75 years with metastatic colorectal and gastric cancer: a study of the Multidisciplinary Oncology Group on Gastrointestinal Tumors. Anticancer Drugs 19:91–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Emmenegger U, Kerbel RS (2007) Five years of clinical experience with metronomic chemotherapy: achievements and perspectives. Onkologie 30:606–608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bocci G, Nicolaou KC, Kerbel RS (2002) Protracted low-dose effects on human endothelial cell proliferation and survival in vitro reveal a selective antiangiogenic window for various chemotherapeutic drugs. Cancer Res 62:6938–6943

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Colleoni M, Rocca A, Sandri MT et al (2002) Low-dose oral methotrexate and cyclophosphamide in metastatic breast cancer: antitumor activity and correlation with vascular endothelial growth factor levels. Ann Oncol 13:73–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lord R, Nair S, Schache A et al (2007) Low dose metronomic oral cyclophosphamide for hormone resistant prostate cancer: a phase II study. J Urol 177:2136–2140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Garcia AA, Hirte H, Fleming G et al (2008) Phase II clinical trial of bevacizumab and low-dose metronomic oral cyclophosphamide in recurrent ovarian cancer: a trial of the California, Chicago, and Princess Margaret Hospital phase II consortia. J Clin Oncol 26:76–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Krzyzanowska MK, Tannock IF, Lockwood G et al (2007) A phase II trial of continuous low-dose oral cyclophosphamide and celecoxib in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 60:135–141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margherita Nannini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nannini, M., Nobili, E., Di Cicilia, R. et al. To widen the setting of cancer patients who could benefit from metronomic capecitabine. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 64, 189–193 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-0930-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-009-0930-z

Keywords

Navigation