Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A phase II study of capecitabine and cisplatin (XP) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (FP) remains the mostly used regimen for metastatic esophageal squamous carcinoma. This phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of capecitabine/cisplatin (XP) as a first-line chemotherapy in a homogenous cohort of patients with metastatic or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Materials and methods

Patients received 60 mg/m2 of cisplatin intravenously (IV) on day 1 and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2/dose orally twice a day on days 1–14. Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks until the documented disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient’s refusal. Immunohistochemical studies against thymidylate synthase (TS) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) were performed to seek predictive markers for treatment response.

Results

Between December 2003 and March 2006, 45 patients entered the study. All patients had histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. The overall response rate (ORR) was 57.8% (95% CI, 43.3–72.2) with 0 CR and 26 PRs. The median duration of response in responders was 4.6 months (1.0–15.6 months). With a median follow-up duration of 25.7 months (10.8–42.6 months), the median time to progression was 4.7 months (95% CI, 2.5–7.0) and the median survival time was 11.2 months (95% CI, 8.5–13.9). Common grade 3 or 4 non-hematological adverse events were anorexia (18/191, 9.4%), fatigue (9/191, 4.7%), constipation (6/191, 3.1%), hand-foot syndrome (6/191, 3.1%) and diarrhea (4/191, 2.1%). The most common grade 3 or 4 hematological adverse events were neutropenia (33/191, 17.3%), followed by leucopenia (11/191, 5.8%), anemia (2/191, 1.0%) and thrombocytopenia (1/191, 0.5%). There was no treatment-related death. Neither TS nor TP showed predictive value for treatment response.

Conclusion

The XP regimen demonstrated a promising antitumor activity in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, which may potentially replace the FP regimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF Jr (1998) Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer 83:2049–2053

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blot WJ, McLaughlin JK (1999) The changing epidemiology of esophageal cancer. Semin Oncol 26:2–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kelsen DP, Ginsberg R, Pajak TF, Sheahan DG, Gunderson L, Mortimer J, Estes N, Haller DG, Ajani J, Kocha W, Minsky BD, Roth JA (1998) Chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for localized esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 339:1979–1984

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, Ghafoor A, Ward E, Thun MJ (2003) Cancer statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 53:5–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Enzinger PC, Ilson DH, Kelsen DP (1999) Chemotherapy in esophageal cancer. Semin Oncol 26:12–20

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Devita VT HS, Rosenberg SA (2005) Cancer: principles and practice of oncology, 7th edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bleiberg H, Conroy T, Paillot B, Lacave AJ, Blijham G, Jacob JH, Bedenne L, Namer M, De Besi P, Gay F, Collette L, Sahmoud T (1997) Randomised phase II study of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus cisplatin alone in advanced squamous cell oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer 33:1216–1220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McGavin JK, Goa KL (2001) Capecitabine: a review of its use in the treatment of advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. Drugs 61:2309–2326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jatoi A, Murphy BR, Foster NR, Nikcevich DA, Alberts SR, Knost JA, Fitch TR, Rowland KM Jr (2006) Oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction and gastric cardia: a phase II study from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Ann Oncol 17:29–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang HJ, Chang HM, Kim TW, Ryu MH, Sohn HJ, Yook JH, Oh ST, Kim BS, Lee JS, Kang YK (2005) Phase II study of capecitabine and cisplatin as first-line combination therapy in patients with gastric cancer recurrent after fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 92:246–251

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Viteri A, Barcelo-Galindez R, Rubio I et al (2004) Cisplatin and capecitabine as first-line therapy for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 22:14s (Abstr#4187)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim TW, Kang YK, Ahn JH, Chang HM, Yook JH, Oh ST, Kim BS, Lee JS (2002) Phase II study of capecitabine plus cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 13:1893–1898

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang YK, Kang WK, Shin DB et al (2006) Randomized phase III trial of capecitabine/cisplatin (XP) vs. continuous infusion of 5-FU/cisplatin (FP) as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) efficacy and safety results. J Clin Oncol 24:934 (Abstr# LBA4018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lindebjerg J, Nielsen JN, Hoeffding LD, Jakobsen A (2005) Immunohistochemical expression of thymidylate synthase as predictor of response to capecitabine in patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma. APMIS 113:600–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Simon R (1989) Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 10:1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cunningham D RS, Starling N et al (2006) Randomised multicentre phase III study comparing capecitabine with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin with cisplatin in patients with advanced oesophagogastric cancer: the REAL-2 trial. J Clin Oncol 24:186 (abstr#LBA4017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lorenzen S, Duyster J, Lersch C, von Delius S, Hennig M, Bredenkamp R, Peschel C, Lordick F (2005) Capecitabine plus docetaxel every 3 weeks in first- and second-line metastatic oesophageal cancer: final results of a phase II trial. Br J Cancer 92:2129–2133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jatoi A, Foster N, Johnson P, Klee G, Quevedo JF, Morton RF, Nair S, Kardinal CG, Mailliard JA (2004) Investigating four ‘myths’ surrounding dysphagia in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer. A multi-institutional study from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Dis Esophagus 17:292–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Meropol NJ, Gold PJ, Diasio RB, Andria M, Dhami M, Godfrey T, Kovatich AJ, Lund KA, Mitchell E, Schwarting R (2006) Thymidine phosphorylase expression is associated with response to capecitabine plus irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:4069–4077

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Han JY, Hong EK, Lee SY, Yoon SM, Lee DH, Lee JS (2005) Thymidine phosphorylase expression in tumour cells and tumour response to capecitabine plus docetaxel chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Pathol 58:650–654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Hyuck Im.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, J., Im, YH., Cho, E.Y. et al. A phase II study of capecitabine and cisplatin (XP) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 62, 77–84 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-007-0577-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-007-0577-6

Keywords

Navigation