Skip to main content
Log in

Irinotecan in combination with thalidomide in patients with advanced solid tumors: a clinical study with pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic evaluation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: Recent clinical studies have demonstrated a reduction of irinotecan (CPT-11) gastrointestinal toxicities when the CPT-11 is administered in combination with thalidomide in patients with diagnosis of colorectal cancer. The main purpose of this study was to investigate possible interactions between CPT-11 pharmacokinetics and thalidomide to explain the previously described gastrointestinal toxicity reduction. Methods: In our clinical trial, advanced cancer patients were treated with CPT-11 on a dose of 350 mg/m2 at day 1 every 3 weeks. Only at the first cycle, CPT-11 was administered in association with thalidomide on a dose of 400 mg/day given from day 1 to day 14. From the second cycle, the treatment was continued with irinotecan alone at the same dose. Pharmacokinetics analysis of irinotecan and its metabolites, SN-38 and SN-38-glucuronide, were performed at the first and second cycle. Results: A total of 19 patients entered the study. The pharmacokinetic analysis were performed on 16 patients. Pharmacokinetic data suggested a decreased metabolism of irinotecan into SN-38 and SN-38-glucuronide when it was administered with thalidomide. Indeed, area under the time–concentration curve (AUC) of SN-38 was significantly lower at the first cycle than the second cycle (0.99±0.45 h×μg/ml vs 1.34±0.65, respectively, P=0.027) whereas AUC of irinotecan and SN-38-glucuronide were higher at first cycle than second cycle (34.53±11.38 h×µg/ml vs. 28.42±12.23 h×µg/ml, P=0.064 and 2.39±1.21 h(μg/ml vs. 1.86±1.11 h×μg/ml, P=0.018, respectively). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates a significant decreased metabolism of CPT-11 into the active metabolite SN-38 when CPT-11 is administered in association with thalidomide. These observations strongly suggest an interaction of thalidomide with CPT-11 metabolism and, at least in part, it might explain the previously described improvement in tolerability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CPT-11:

Irinotecan

CRC:

Colorectal cancer

5-FU:

5-Fluorouracil

LV:

Leucovorin

NCI:

National Cancer Institute

ECOG:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

SN-38:

7-Ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin

SN-38 glucuronide:

7-ethyl-10-[3,4,5-trihydroxy-pyran-2-carboxylic acid]-camptothecin (the β-glucuronide conjugate of SN-38)

AUC:

Area under the time versus plasma concentration curve

t1/2β:

Elimination half-life

CL:

Total body clearance

C max :

Maximal plasma concentration

T max :

Time to reach C max

REC:

Relative extent of conversion

MR:

Metabolic ratio

BI:

Biliary index

GR:

Glucuronidation ratio

RECIST:

Response evaluation criteria in solid tumor

APC:

7-Ethyl-10 (4-N-5-aminopentanoic acid)-(1-piperidino)-carbonyloxycamptothecin

NPC:

7-Ethyl-10 (4-(1-piperidino)-1-amino)-carbonyloxycamptothecin

AEDs:

Antiepileptic drugs

CYP450:

Cytochrome P-450

ABC:

ATP binding cassette

References

  1. Kunimoto T, Nitta K, Kanaka T, Uehara N, Baba H, Takeuchi M, Yokokura T, Sawada S, Miyasaka T, Mutai M (1987) Antitumor activity of 7-ethyl-10 (4-(1-piperidino)-1 piperidino)-1-carboniloxi-campthotecin, a novel water soluble derivative of campthotecin, against murine tumor. Cancer Res 47:5944–5947

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Canal P, Gay C, Dazeuse A, Douillard JY, Bugat R, Brunet R, Adenis A, Herait P, Lokiec F, Mathieu-Boue A (1996) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan during a phase II clinical trial in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 14:2688–2695

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuchs CS, Moore MR, Harker G, Villa L, Rinaldi D, Hecht JR (2003) Phase III comparison of two irinotecan dosing regimens in second-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:807–814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Negoro S, Masuda N, Takada Y, Sugiura T, Kudoh S, Katakami N, Ariyoshi Y, Ohashi Y, Niitani H, Fukuoka M; CPT-11 Lung Cancer Study Group West (2003) Randomized phase III trial of irinotecan combined with cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 88:335–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedman HS, Petros WP, Friedman AH, Schaaf LJ, Kerby T, Lawyer J, Parry M, Houghton PJ, Lovell S, Rasheed K, Cloughsey T, Stewart ES, Colvin OM, Provenzale JM, McLendon RE, Bigner DD, Cokgor I, Haglund M, Rich J, Ashley D, Malczyn J, Elfring GL, Miller LL (1999) Irinotecan therapy in adults with recurrent or progressiv malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 17:1516–1525

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Perez EA, Hillman DW, Mailliard JA, Ingle JN, Ryan JM, Fitch TR, Rowland KM, Kardinal CG, Krook JE, Kugler JW, Dakhil SR (2004) Randomized phase II study of two irinotecan schedules for patients with metastatic breast cancer refractory to an anthracycline, a taxane, or both. J Clin Oncol 22:2849–2855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kohene CH, Catane R, Klein B, Ducreux M, Thuss-Patience P, Niederle N, Gips M, Preusser P, Knuth A, Clemens M, Bugat R, Figer I, Shani A, Fages B, Di Betta D, Jacques C, Wilke HJ (2003) Irinotecan is active in chemonaive patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a phase II multicenter trial. Br J Cancer 89:997–1001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pitot HC, Wender DB, O’Connell MJ, Schroeder G, Goldberg RM, Rubin J, Mailliard JA, Knost JA, Ghosh C, Kirschling RJ, Levitt R, Windschitl HE (1997) Phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 15:2910–2919

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rougier P, Bugat R, Douillard JY, Culine S, Suc E, Brunet P, Becouarn Y, Ychou M, Marty M, Extra JM, Bonneterre J, Adenis A, Seitz JF, Ganem G, Namer M, Conroy T, Negrier S, Merrouche Y, Burki F, Mousseau M, Herait P, Mahjoubi M (1997) Phase II study of irinotecan in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in chemotherapy-naïve patients and patients pretreated with fluorouracil based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 15:251–260

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cunningham D, Glimelius B (1999) A phase III study of irinotecan (CPT-11) versus best supportive care in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have failed 5-fluorouracil therapy. Sem Oncol 26(suppl 5):6–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rougier P, Van Cutsem E, Bajetta E, Niederle N, Possinger K, Labianca R, Navarro M, Morant R, Bleiberg H, Wils J, Awad L, Herait P, Jacques C (1998) Randomized trial of irinotecan versus fluorouracil by continous infusion after fluorouracil failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet 352:1407–1412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Graeven U, Ridwelski K, Manns M (2000) Irinotecan with bolus 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: an active and safe regiment. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 19 abstract no. 952

  13. Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, Navarro M, James RD, Karasek P, Jandik P, Iveson T, Carmichael J, Alakl M, Gruia G, Awad L, Rougier P (2000) Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomized trial. Lancet 355:1041–1047

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, Rosen LS, Fehrenbacher L, Moore MJ, Maroun JA, Ackland SP, Locker PK, Pirotta N, Elfring GL, Miller LL (2000) Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 343:905–914

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Saltz LB, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D (2004) Irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin (IFL) versus fluorouracil/leucovorin alone (FL) in stage III colon cancer (intergroup trial CALGB C89803). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22: abstract no. 3500

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sasaki K, Takasaka H, Kiriyama K (2004) Adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy for Dukes C colorectal cancer; weekly low-dose Irinotecan (CPT-11) plus 5 FU versus oral 5FU only. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22: abstract no. 3735

    Google Scholar 

  17. Canal P, Gay C, Dezeuse A, Douillard JY, Bugat R, Brunet R, Adenis A, Herait P, Lokiec F, Mathieu-Boue A (1996) Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of irinotecan during a phase II clinical trial in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 10:2688–2695

    Google Scholar 

  18. De Forni M, Bugat R, Chabot GG, Culine S, Extra JM, Gouyette A, Madelaine I, Marty ME, Mathieu-Boue A (1994) Phase I and pharmacokinetics study of the camptothecin derivative irinotecan, administered on a weekly schedule in cancer patients. Cancer Res 54:4347–4354

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Abigerges D, Chabot GG, Armand J, Herait P, Gouyette A, Gandia D (1995) Phase I and pharmacologic studies of the camptothecin analogue irinotecan administered every 3 weeks in cancer ptients. J Clin Oncol 13:210–221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Catimel G, Chabot GG, Guastella JP, Dumortier A, Cote C, Engel C, Gouyette A, Mathieu-Boue A, Mahjoubi M, Clavel M (1995) Phase I and pharmacokinetics study of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered daily for three consecutive days every three weeks in patients with advances solid tumors. Ann Oncol 6:133–140

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bleiberg H, Cvitkovic E (1996) Characterisation and clinical management of CPT-11 induced adverse events: the european perspective. Eur J Cancer 32A(suppl 3):S18–S23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Conti JA, Kemeny NE, Saltz LB, Huang Y, Tong WP, Chou TC, Sun M, Pulliam S, Gonzalez C (1996) Irinotecan is an active agent in untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 14:709–715

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Abigerges D, Armand JP, Chabot GC, Da Costa L, Fadel E, Cote C, Herait P, Gandia D (1994) Irinotecan high-dose escalation using intensive high-dose loperamide to control diarrhea. J Nat Cancer Inst 86:446–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Stephens TD, Bunde CJ, Fillemore BJ (2000) Mechanism of action in thalidomide teratogenesis. Biochem Pharmacol 59:1489–1499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. McHugh SM, Rifkin IR, Deighton J, Wilson AB, Lachmann PJ, Lockwood CM, Ewan PW ( (1995) The immunosuppressive drug thalidomide induces T helper cell type 2 (Th2) and concomitantly inhibits Th1 cytokine production in mitogen- and antigen-stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures. Clin Exp Immunol 99:160–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kenyon BM, Browne F, D’Amato RJ (1997) Effects of thalidomide and related metabolites in a mouse corneal model of neovascularization. Exp Eye Res 64:971–978

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Or R, Feferman R, Shoshan S (1998) Thalidomide reduces vascular density in granulation tissue of subcutaneously implanted polyvinyl alcohol sponges in guinea pigs. Exp Hematol 26:217–221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Singhal S, Mehta J, Desikan R, Ayers D, Roberson P, Eddlemon P, Munshi N, Anaissie E, Wilson C, Dhodapkar M, Zeddis J, Barlogie B (1999) Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 341:1565–1571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rajkumar SV, Fonseca R, Dispenzieri A, et al (1999) Thalidomide in the treatment of relapsed and refractory myeloma. Blood 94(suppl 1):316a

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fine HA, Figg WD, Jaeckle K, Wen PY, Kyritsis AP, Loeffler JS, Levin VA, Black PM, Kaplan R, Pluda JM, Yung WK (2000) A phase II trial of the antiangiogenic agent thalidomide in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. J Clin Oncol 18:708–715

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Figg WD, Dahut W, Duray P, Hamilton M, Tompkins A, Steinberg SM, Jones E, Premkumar A, Linehan WM, Floeter MK, Chen CC, Dixon S, Kohler DR, Kruger EA, Gubish E, Pluda JM, Reed E (2001) A Randomized phase II trial of docetaxel (taxotere) plus thalidomide, an angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 7:1888–1893

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Motzer RJ, Berg W, Ginsberg M, Russo P, Vuky J, Yu R, Bacik J, Mazumdar M (2002) Phase II trial of Thalidomide for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 20:302–306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Govindarajan R, Heaton KM, Broadwater R, Zeitlin A, Lang NP, Hauer-Jensen M (2000) Effect of thalidomide on gastrointestinal toxic effects of irinotecan. Lancet 356:566–567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Govindarajan R (2000) Irinotecan/thalidomide in metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncology 16(suppl):23–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Govindarajan R, Maddox A, Gray P (2003) Irinotecan and thalidomide prolong disease free and overall survival in 5FU refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 22:249: abstract no. 997

    Google Scholar 

  36. Barileiro I, Gandia D, Armand JP, Mathieu-Boue A, Re M, Gouyette A, Chabot GG (1992) Simultaneus determination of the camptothecin analogue CPT-11 and its active metabolite SN-38 by high-performance liquid chromatography: application to plasma pharmacokinetics studies in cancer patients. J Chromatogr Biomed Appl 575:275–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European organization for research and treatment of cancer, National Cancer Institute of United states, National Cancer Institute Of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Friedman LM, Furberg DC, De Mets DL. Fundamentals of clinical trials. Third Edition, Springer

  39. Crews KR, Stewart CF, Jones-Wallace D, Thompson SJ, Houghton PJ, Heideman RL, Fouladi M, Bowers DC, Chintagumpala MM, Gajjar A (2002) Altered irinotecan pharmacokinetics in pediatric high-grade glioma patients receiving enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant therapy. Clin Cancer Res 8:2202–2209

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Gupta E, Lestingi TM, Mick R, Ramirez J, Vokes EE, Ratain MJ (1994) Metabolic fate of irinotecan in humans: correlation of glicuronation with diarrhea. Cancer Res 54:3723–3725

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gupta E, Mick R, Ramirez J, Wang X, Lestingi TM, Vokes EE, Ratain MJ (1997) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodinamic evaluation of the topoisomerase inhibitor irinotecan in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 15:1502–1510

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mick R, Gupta E, Vokes EE, Ratain MJ (1996) Limited sampling models for irinotecan pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics: prediction of biliary index and intestinal toxicity. J Clin Oncol 14:2012–2019

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Haaz MC, Rivory LP, Riche C, Robert J (1997) The transformation of irinotecan (CPT-11) to its active metabolite SN-38 by human liver microsomes. Differential hydrolysis for the lactone and carboxylate forms. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 356:257–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Charasson V, Haaz MC, Robert J (2002) Determination of drug interactions occurring with the metabolic pathways of irinotecan. Drug Metab Dispos 30:731–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Haaz MC, Riche C, Rivory LP, Robert J (1998) Biosynthesis of an aminopiperidino metabolite of irinotecan [7–ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecine] by human hepatic microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos 26:769–774

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ando Y, Fuse E, Figg WD (2002) Thalidomide metabolism by the CYP2C subfamily. Clin Cancer Res 8:1964–1973

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Lu J, Palmer BD, Kestell P, Browett P, Baguley BC, Muller G, Ching LM (2003) Thalidomide metabolites in mice and patients with multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res 9:1680–1688

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Teo SK, Sabourin PJ, O’Brien K, Kook KA, Thomas SD (2000) Metabolism of thalidomide in human microsomes, cloned human Cytochrome P-450 isoenzymes, and Hansen’s disease patients. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 14:140–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Lu J, Helsby N, Palmer BD, Tingle M, Baguley BC, Kestell P, Ching LM (2004) Metabolism of thalidomide in liver microsomes of mice, rabbits, and humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 310:571–577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Patel NJ, Zamek-Gliszczynski MJ, Zhang P, Han YH, Jansen PL, Meier PJ, Stieger B, Brouwer KL (2003) Phenobarbital alters hepatic Mrp2 function by direct and indirect interactions. Mol Pharmacol 64:154–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Weiss J, Kerpen CJ, Lindenmaier H, Dormann SM, Haefeli WE (2003) Interaction of antiepileptic drugs with human P-glycoprotein in vitro. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 307:262–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Xiong H, Suzuki H, Sugiyama Y, Meier PJ, Pollack GM, Brouwer KL (2002) Mechanisms of impaired biliary excretion of acetaminophen glucuronide after acute phenobarbital treatment or phenobarbital pretreatment. Drug Metab Dispos 30:962–969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowlegments

The authors thanks Mr. Michele Andreuccetti for technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giacomo Allegrini.

Additional information

Grant support: The work was partially supported by Associazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro (AIRC) and Fondazione A.R.C.O.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allegrini, G., Di Paolo , A., Cerri, E. et al. Irinotecan in combination with thalidomide in patients with advanced solid tumors: a clinical study with pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic evaluation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 58, 585–593 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-006-0205-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-006-0205-x

Keywords

Navigation