Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accelerator mass spectrometry allows for cellular quantification of doxorubicin at femtomolar concentrations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) is a highly sensitive analytical methodology used to quantify the content of radioisotopes, such as 14C, in a sample. The primary goals of this work were to demonstrate the utility of AMS in determining total cellular [14C]anthracycline concentrations following administration of doxorubicin (DOX) and to develop a sensitive assay that is superior to high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) for the quantification of [14C]anthracycline at the tumor level. In order to validate the sensitivity of AMS versus HPLC with fluorescence detection, we performed three studies comparing the cellular accumulation of DOX: one in vitro cell line study, and two in vivo xenograft mouse studies. Using AMS, we quantified cellular [14C]anthracycline content up to 4 h following in vitro exposure at concentrations ranging from 0.2 pg/ml (345 fM) to 2 μg/ml (3.45 μM) [14C]DOX. The results of this study show that, compared to standard fluorescence-based HPLC, the AMS method was over five orders of magnitude more sensitive. Two in vivo studies compared the sensitivity of AMS to HPLC using a nude mouse xenograft model in which breast cancer cells were implanted subcutaneously. After sufficiently large tumors formed, [14C]DOX was administered intravenously at two dose levels. Additionally, we tested the AMS method in a nude mouse xenograft model of multidrug resistance (MDR) in which each mouse was implanted with both wild type and MDR+ cells on opposite flanks. The results of the second and third studies showed that [14C]anthracycline concentrations were significantly higher in the wild type tumors compared to the MDR+ tumors, consistent with the MDR model. Although this method does not discriminate between parent drug and metabolites, the extreme sensitivity of AMS should facilitate similar studies in humans to establish target site drug delivery and to potentially determine the optimal treatment dose and regimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson AB, Ciriacks CM, Fuller KM, Arriaga EA (2003) Distribution of zeptomole-abundant doxorubicin metabolites in subcellular fractions by capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection. Anal Chem 75(1):8–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson AB, Gergen J, Arriaga EA (2002) Detection of doxorubicin and metabolites in cell extracts and in single cells by capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection. J Chromatogr B 769:97–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker WJ, Mäenpää JU, Wurz GT, Koester SK, Seymour RC, Emshoff VD, Wiebe VJ, DeGregorio MW (1993) Toremifene enhances cell cycle block and growth inhibition by vinblastine in multidrug resistant human breast cancer cells. Oncol Res 5(6–7):207–212

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen CJ, Chin JE, Ueda K, Clark DP, Pastan I, Gottesman MM, Roninson IB (1986) Internal duplication and homology with bacterial transport proteins in the mdr1 (P-glycoprotein) gene from multidrug-resistant human cells. Cell 47(3):381–389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Citro G, Verdina A, Galati R, Floridi A (1988) Quantitation of adriamycin content by a sensitive immunochemical assay. Anticancer Res 8:549–552

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cupid BC, Lightfoot TJ, Russell D, Gant SJ, Turner PC, Dingley KH, Curtis KD, Leveson SH, Turteltaub KW, Garner RC (2004) The formation of AFB(1)-macromolecular adducts in rats and humans at dietary levels of exposure. Food Chem Toxicol 42(4):559–569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. de Bruijn P, Verweij J, Loos WJ, Kolker HJ, Planting AS, Nooter K, Stoter G, Sparreboom A (2003) Determination of doxorubicin and doxorubicinol in plasma of cancer patients by high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal Biochem 266(2):216–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gavenda A, Sevcik J, Psotova J, Bednar P, Bartak P, Adamovsky P, Simanek V (2001) Determination of anthracycline antibiotics doxorubicin and daunorubicin by capillary electrophoresis with UV absorption detection. Electrophoresis 22:2782–2785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gottesman M, Fojo T, Bates S (2002) Multidrug resistance in cancer: role of ATP-dependent transporters. Nat Rev Cancer 2(1):48–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gottesman MM, Pastan I (1993) Biochemistry of multidrug resistance mediated by the multidrug transporter. Annu Rev Biochem 62:385–427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hempel G, Haberland S, Schulze-Westhoff P, Mohling N, Blaschke G, Boos J (1997) Determination of idarubicin and idarubicinol in plasma by capillary electrophoresis. J Chromatogr B 698:287–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lachatre F, Marquet P, Ragot S, Gaulier JM, Cardot P, Dupuy JL (2000) Simultaneous determination of four anthracyclines and three metabolites in human serum by liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B 738:281–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis JS, Dearling JL, Sosabowski JK, Zweit J, Carnochan P, Kelland LR, Coley HM, Blower PJ (2000) Copper bis(diphosphine) complexes: radiopharmaceuticals for the detection of multidrug resistance in tumours by PET. Eur J Nucl Med 27(6):638–646

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Maxwell RJ (1993) New techniques in the pharmacokinetic analysis of cancer drugs. III. Nuclear magnetic resonance. Cancer Surv 17:415–423

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ognibene TJ, Bench G, Brown TA, Peaslee GF, Vogel JS (2002) A new accelerator mass spectrometry system for 14C-quantification of biochemical samples. Int J Mass Spectrom 218:255–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ognibene TJ, Bench G, Vogel JS, Peaslee GF, Murov S (2003) A high-throughput method for the conversion of CO2 obtained from biochemical samples to graphite in septa-sealed vials for quantification of 14C via accelerator mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 75:2192–2196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Perez-Ruiz T, Martinez-Lozano C, Sanz A, Bravo E (2001) Simultaneous determination of doxorubicin, danorubicin and iadrubicin by capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection. Electrophoresis 22:134–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Port R, Hanisch F, Becker M, Bachert P, Zeller J (1999) Local disposition kinetics of floxuridine after intratumoral and subcutaneous injection as monitored by [19F]-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in vivo. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 44(1):65–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Reinhoud NJ, Tjaden UR, Irth H, van der Greef J (1992) Bioanalysis of some anthracyclines in human plasma by capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection. J Chromatogr Biomed Appl 574:327–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma V, Beatty A, Wey S-P, Dahlheimer J, Pica CM, Crankshaw CL, Bass L, Green MA, Welch MJ, Piwnica-Worms D (2000) Novel gallium(III) complexes transported by MDR1 p-glycoprotein: potential PET imaging agents for probing p-glycoprotein-mediated transport activity in vivo. Chem Biol 7(5):335–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharma V (2004) Radiopharmaceuticals for assessment of multidrug resistance p-glycoprotein-mediated drug transport activity. Bioconjugate Chem 15(6):1464–1474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Simeon N, Chatelut E, Canal P, Nertz M, Couderc F (1999) Anthracycline analysis by capillary electrophoresis: application to the analysis of daunorubicine in Kaposi sarcoma tumor. J Chromatogr A 853:449–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tilsley DW, Harte RJ, Jones T, Brady F, Luthra SK, Brown G, Price PM (1993) New techniques in the pharmacokinetic analysis of cancer drugs. IV. Positron emission tomography. Cancer Surv 17:425–442

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Turteltaub KW, Vogel JS (2000) Bioanalytical applications of accelerator mass spectrometry for pharmaceutical research. Curr Pharm Des 6:991–1007

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Turteltaub KW, Dingley KH, Curtis KD, Malfatti MA, Turesky RJ, Garner RC, Felton JS, Lang NP (1999) Macromolecular adduct formation and metabolism of heterocyclic amines in humans and rodents at low doses. Cancer Lett 143(2):149–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vogel JS (1992) Rapid production of graphite without contamination for biomedical AMS. Radiocarbon 34:344–350

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wiebe V, Koester S, Lindberg M, Emshoff V, Baker J, Wurz G, DeGregorio M (1992) Toremifene and its metabolites enhance doxorubicin accumulation in estrogen receptor negative multidrug resistant human breast cancer cells. Investig New Drugs 10:63–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Kurt Haack for AMS sample preparation for 14C analysis. This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy by the University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract No. W-7405-Eng-48 and supported by a UC Davis Research and Development award from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and National Institutes of Health grant 1 P30 CA93373–01 and by the National Center for Research Resources (RR13461).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. W. DeGregorio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeGregorio, M.W., Dingley, K.H., Wurz, G.T. et al. Accelerator mass spectrometry allows for cellular quantification of doxorubicin at femtomolar concentrations. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 57, 335–342 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-005-0060-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-005-0060-1

Keywords

Navigation