Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Potential for drug interactions in hospitalized cancer patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To quantify the frequency of potential drug interactions unrelated to chemotherapy in cancer patients admitted to our institution, and to define risk factors for such interactions.

Methods

Charts of 100 consecutive hospitalized cancer patients were reviewed. Patients receiving chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy were excluded, as were patients admitted for intensive care. Drug–drug interactions were screened with Drug Interaction Facts software, and manually by the authors. Potential interactions were graded by levels of severity (severe, moderate, minor) and significance (one to five, with one representing the highest level of evidence).

Results

The median age of the patients was 67 years, and the length of hospital stay and the number of drugs per patient were 6 days and eight drugs, respectively. In 63 patients 180 potential interactions were detected. Of the potential interactions, 18.3% were severe, 56.7% were moderate, and 25% were minor. Approximately 7%, 18% and 13% of potential interactions were graded as level 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In multivariate analysis, prescriptions with eight or more drugs (P=0.0004) and six or more days of hospital stay (P=0.014) were independent risk factors for potential interactions.

Conclusion

Potential drug interactions are common among hospitalized cancer patients. Length of hospital stay and number of prescribed drugs are risk factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrons R (2004) Evaluation of personal digital assistant software for drug interactions. Am J Health Syst Pharm 61:380–385

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beers MH, Storrie M, Lee G (1990) Potential adverse drug interactions in the emergency room. An issue in the quality of care. Ann Intern Med 112:61–64

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard S, Bruera E (2000) Drug interactions in palliative care. J Clin Oncol 18:1780–1799

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bjerrum L, Andersen M, Petersen G, Kragstrup J (2003) Exposure to potential drug interactions in primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care 21:153–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buajordet I, Ebbesen J, Erikssen J, Brors O, Hilberg T (2001) Fatal adverse drug events: the paradox of drug treatment. J Intern Med 250:327–341

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carbonin P, Pahor M, Bernabei R, Sgadari A (1991) Is age an independent risk factor of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized medical patients? J Am Geriatr Soc 39:1093–1099

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ciummo PE, Katz NL (1995) Interactions and drug-metabolizing enzymes. Am Pharm NS35:41–51; quiz 51–53

    Google Scholar 

  8. Corcoran ME (1997) Polypharmacy in the older patient with cancer. Cancer Control 4:419–428

    Google Scholar 

  9. Craig C, Stiztel R (1997) Modern pharmacology with clinical application, 5th edn. Little Brown and Company, New York

  10. Daly MP, Lamy PP, Richardson JP (1994) Avoiding polypharmacy and iatrogenesis in the nursing home. Md Med J 43:139–144

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davidson KW, Kahn A, Price RD (1987) Reduction of adverse drug reactions by computerized drug interaction screening. J Fam Pract 25:371–375

    Google Scholar 

  12. Delafuente JC (2003) Understanding and preventing drug interactions in elderly patients. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 48:133–143

    Google Scholar 

  13. eFacts Online (accessed 2003 May through October) Drug interaction facts. Wolters Kluwer Health. http://www.factsandcomparisons.com

  14. Egger SS, Drewe J, Schlienger RG (2003) Potential drug–drug interactions in the medication of medical patients at hospital discharge. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 58:773–778

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fauno P, Petersen KD, Husted SE (1993) Increased blood loss after preoperative NSAID. Retrospective study of 186 hip arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 64:522–524

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gear RW, Miaskowski C, Heller PH, Paul SM, Gordon NC, Levine JD (1997) Benzodiazepine mediated antagonism of opioid analgesia. Pain 71:25–29

    Google Scholar 

  17. Geppert U, Beindl W, Hawranek T, Hintner H (2003) Drug interactions in clinical practice. A pilot project for quality assurance in prescribing. Hautarzt 54:53–57

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gerson LB, Triadafilopoulos G (2001) Proton pump inhibitors and their drug interactions: an evidence-based approach. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:611–616

    Google Scholar 

  19. Glassman PA, Simon B, Belperio P, Lanto A (2002) Improving recognition of drug interactions: benefits and barriers to using automated drug alerts. Med Care 40:1161–1171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldberg RM, Mabee J, Mammone M, Chan L, Tarleton G, Broderick S, Robinson DC, Hurst AK, Whelan GP (1994) A comparison of drug interaction software programs: applicability to the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 24:619–625

    Google Scholar 

  21. Goldberg RM, Mabee J, Chan L, Wong S (1996) Drug–drug and drug–disease interactions in the ED: analysis of a high-risk population. Am J Emerg Med 14:447–450

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hancock D, Kennington JM, Beckner RR, Quick G (1992) Emergency department medication and drug interaction evaluation. Hosp Pharm 27:129–132

    Google Scholar 

  23. Heininger-Rothbucher D, Bischinger S, Ulmer H, Pechlaner C, Speer G, Wiedermann CJ (2001) Incidence and risk of potential adverse drug interactions in the emergency room. Resuscitation 49:283–288

    Google Scholar 

  24. Herr RD, Caravati EM, Tyler LS, Iorg E, Linscott MS (1992) Prospective evaluation of adverse drug interactions in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 21:1331–1336

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jankel CA, Martin BC (1992) Evaluation of six computerized drug interaction screening programs. Am J Hosp Pharm 49:1430–1435

    Google Scholar 

  27. Karas S Jr (1981) The potential for drug interactions. Ann Emerg Med 10:627–630

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lackner TE (1991) Interaction of dexamethasone with phenytoin. Pharmacotherapy 11:344–347

    Google Scholar 

  29. McLeod HL (1998) Clinically relevant drug–drug interactions in oncology. Br J Clin Pharmacol 45:539–544

    Google Scholar 

  30. Michocki RJ, Lamy PP, Hooper FJ, Richardson JP (1993) Drug prescribing for the elderly. Arch Fam Med 2:441–444

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pick CG (1997) Antinociceptive interaction between alprazolam and opioids. Brain Res Bull 42:239–243

    Google Scholar 

  32. Poirier TI, Giudici R (1995) Evaluation of drug interaction microcomputer software: an updated comparison. Hosp Pharm 30:888–890, 893–894

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sternbach H (1991) The serotonin syndrome. Am J Psychiatry 148:705–713

    Google Scholar 

  34. Tatro DS (ed) (1997) Drug interaction facts, 4th edn. Facts and Comparisons, St. Louis, MO

  35. Weale AE, Warwick DJ, Durant N, Prothero D (1995) Is there a clinical interaction between low molecular weight heparin and non-steroidal analgesics after total hip replacement? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 77:35–37

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Ian Tannock for his editorial help and thoughtful review of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Pimenta Riechelmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riechelmann, R.P., Moreira, F., Smaletz, Ò. et al. Potential for drug interactions in hospitalized cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 56, 286–290 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-004-0998-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-004-0998-4

Keywords

Navigation