Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the feasibility and activity of gemcitabine and vinorelbine as a second/third-line approach in patients with advanced breast cancer.

Methods

Entered into the study were 51 consecutive patients. All had been previously treated with anthracyclines. Of these 51 patients, 36 had experienced failure or relapse after one chemotherapy line for advanced disease, and 15 after two chemotherapy lines. The dominant sites of involvement were brain in 4 patients (7.8%), liver in 22 (43.2%), lung in 10 (19.6%), bone in 10 (19.6), and soft-tissue in 5 (9.8%). Treatment consisted of vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 administered on days 1 and 8 every 21 days.

Results

The scheme was well tolerated. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 11% of patients. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting occurred in 6%, and grade 2 neurotoxicity in 6%. No patients experienced grade 3/4 alopecia. The median relative dose intensity was 94.6% (49.7–100%) and 90.0% (23.1–100%) for vinorelbine and gemcitabine, respectively. Two patients (3.9%) were not evaluable for disease response, 4 (7.8%) attained a clinical complete response, 13 (25.5%) a partial response (for an overall response rate of 33.3%, 95% coefficient interval 20.0–46.0%), 23 (45.2%) showed stable disease, and 9 (17.6%) progressed. The median time to progression of responding patients was 10.8 months, and the median overall survival of the entire population was 17.8 months.

Conclusions

Vinorelbine and gemcitabine is a manageable scheme with moderate activity in pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Verdecchia A (1996) Survival in adult Italian cancer patients (1978–1989). ITACARE Working Group. Tumori 83:39–425

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hortobagyi GN (1994) Multidisciplinary management of advanced primary and metastatic breast cancer. Cancer 74 [1 Suppl 1]:416–423

  3. Ellis MJ, Hayes DF, Lippman ME (2000) Treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In: Harris YR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK (eds) Diseases of the breast. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 749–787

  4. Cardoso F, Di Leo A, Lohrisch C, Bernard C, Ferreira F, Piccart MJ (2002) Second and subsequent lines of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: what did we learn in the last two decades? Ann Oncol 13:197–207

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fellous A, Ohayon R, Vacassin T, Binet S, Lataste H, Krikorian A, Couzinier JP, Meininger V (1989) Biochemical effects of Navelbine on tubulin and associated proteins. Semin Oncol 16 [Suppl 4]:9–14

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson SA, Harper P, Hortobagyi GN, Pouillart P (1996) Vinorelbine: an overview. Cancer Treat Rev 22:127–142

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gasparini G, Caffo O, Barni S, Frontini L, Testolin A, Guglielmi RB, Ambrosini G (1994) Vinorelbine is an active antiproliferative agent in pretreated advanced breast cancer patients: a phase II study. J Clin Oncol 12:2094–2101

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weber BL, Vogel C, Jones S, Harvey H, Hutchins L, Bigley J, Hohneker J (1995) Intravenous vinorelbine as first-line and second-line therapy in advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 13:1245–1252

    Google Scholar 

  9. Degardin M, Bonneterre J, Hecquet B, Pion JM, Adenis A, Horner D, Demaille A (1994) Vinorelbine (Navelbine) as salvage treatment for advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 5:423–426

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hertel LW, Kroin JS, Misner JW, Tustin JM (1988) Synthesis of 2-deoxy-2′,2′-difluoro-D-ribose and 2-deoxy-2′,2′'-difluoro-D-ribofuranosyl nucleosides. J Org Chem 53:2406–2409

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hertel LW, Boder GB, Kroin JS, Rinzel SM, Porre G, Todd GC, Grindey GB (1990) Evaluation of the antitumor activity of gemcitabine (2′,2′-difluoro-2′-deoxycitidine). Cancer Res 50:4417–4422

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Luftner D, Flath B, Akrivakis C, Grunewald R, Mergenthaler HG, Possiger K (1998) Gemcitabine for palliative treatment in metastatic breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 124:527–531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Seidman AD (2001) The evolving role of gemcitabine in the management of breast cancer. Oncology 60:189–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lorusso V, Carpagnano F, Frasci G, Panza N, Di Rienzo G, Cisternino ML, Napoli G, Orlando S, Cinieri S, Brunetti C, Palazzo S, De Lena M (2000) Phase I/II study of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:405–411

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Krajnik G, Mohn-Staudner A, Thaler J, Greil R, Schmeikal S, Marhold F, Deutsch J, Preiss P, Malayari R, Schafer-Prokop C, Wein W, Huber H, Pirker R (2000) Vinorelbine-gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): an AASLC phase II trial. Ann Oncol 11:993–998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gianni L, Munzone E, Capri G, Fulfaro F, Tarenzi E, Villani F, Spreafico C, Laffranchi A, Caraceni A, Martini C (1995) Paclitaxel by three-hour infusion in combination with bolus doxorubicin in women with untreated metastatic breast cancer: high antitumor efficacy and cardiac effects in a dose-finding and sequence-finding study. J Clin Oncol 13:2688–2699

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dogliotti L, Berruti A, Buniva T, Zola P, Bau MG, Farris A, Sarobba MG, Bottini A, Alquati P, Deltetto F, Gosso P, Monzeglio C, Moro G, Sussio M, Perroni D (1996) Lonidamine significantly increases the activity of epirubicin in advanced breast cancer patients: results from a multicenter prospective randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 14:1165–1172

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Haider K, Kornek GV, Kwasny W, Weinlander G, Valencak J, Lang F, Puribauer F, Kovats E, Depisch D, Scheithauer W (1999) Treatment of advanced breast cancer with gemcitabine and vinorelbine plus human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. Breast Cancer Res Treat 55:203–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nicolaides C, Dimopoulos MA, Samantas E, Bafaloukos D, Kalofonos C, Fountzilas G, Razi E, Kosmidis P, Pavlidis N (2000) Gemcitabine and vinorelbine as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing after first-line taxane-based chemotherapy: a phase II study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Ann Oncol 11:873–875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Valenza R, Leonardi V, Gebbia V, Agostara B (2000) Gemcitabine and vinorelbine in pretreated advanced breast cancer. A pilot study. Ann Oncol 11:495–496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hortobagyi G (2001) Treatment of advanced breast cancer with gemcitabine and vinorelbine. Oncology (Huntingt) 15 [Suppl 3]:15–17

  22. Mariani G, Tagliabue P, Zucchinelli P, Brambilla C, Demicheli R, Villa E, Marchiaro A, Valagussa P, Bonadonna G, Gianni L (2001) Phase I/II study of gemcitabine in association with vinorelbine for metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 70:163–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stathopoulos GP, Rigatos SK, Pergantas N, Tsavdarides D, Athanasiadis I, Malamos NA, Stathopoulos JG (2002) Phase II trial of biweekly administration of vinorelbine and gemcitabine in pretreated advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:37–41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A (1981) Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47:207–214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Simon R (1989) Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 10:1–10

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Porkka K, Blomqvist C, Rissanen P, Elomea I, Pyrhonen S (1994) Salvage therapies in women who fail to respond to first-line treatment with fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide for advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 12:1639–1647

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Buzdar AU, Asmar L, Hortobagyi GN (1997) Impact of patient characteristics on treatment outcome: anthracycline resistance. Eur J Cancer 33 [Suppl 7]:S3–S6

    Google Scholar 

  28. Berruti A, Sperone P, Bottini A, Gorzegno G, Lorusso V, Brunelli A, Botta M, Tampellini M, Donadio M, Mancarella S, De Lena M, Alquati P, Dogliotti L (2000) Phase II study of vinorelbine with protracted fluorouracil infusion as a second- or third-line approach for advanced breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracyclines. J Clin Oncol 18:3370–3377

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michela Donadio.

Additional information

This work is presented on behalf of the Piemonte Oncology Network.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Donadio, M., Ardine, M., Berruti, A. et al. Gemcitabine and vinorelbine as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 52, 147–152 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-003-0632-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-003-0632-x

Keywords

Navigation