Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

c-KIT-expressing Ewing tumour cells are insensitive to imatinib mesylate (STI571)

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Heading

Abstract

Purpose. In order to determine whether Ewing tumour patients may be potential candidates for imatinib mesylate therapy, we analysed the expression of the currently known imatinib mesylate-sensitive tyrosine kinases and tested sensitivity to imatinib mesylate in a panel of eight Ewing tumour cell lines in vitro.

Methods. Expression of the different tyrosine kinases was assessed by flow cytometry and RT-PCR. Sensitivity to imatinib mesylate was analysed using a standard MTT proliferation assay.

Results. Flow cytometric and RT-PCR analyses in a panel of eight Ewing tumour cell lines demonstrated expression of several imatinib mesylate-sensitive tyrosine kinases, including c-KIT, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, c-ABL and c-ARG. However, in the MTT proliferation assay, all eight Ewing tumour cell lines were found to be resistant to imatinib mesylate at concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 10 µM.

Conclusions. Despite the expression of imatinib mesylate-sensitive tyrosine kinases, Ewing tumour cells proved resistant to imatinib mesylate in vitro. This observation has implications for the selection of patients for experimental therapy with imatinib mesylate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hotfilder, M., Lanvers, C., Jürgens, H. et al. c-KIT-expressing Ewing tumour cells are insensitive to imatinib mesylate (STI571). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 50, 167–169 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-002-0477-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-002-0477-8

Navigation