Skip to main content
Log in

Is re-challenge still an option as salvage therapy in multiple myeloma? The case of REal-life BOrtezomib re-Use as secoND treatment for relapsed patients exposed frontline to bortezomib-based therapies (the REBOUND Study)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Therapeutic re-challenge is currently a debated issue in the field of multiple myeloma (MM), given the recent availability of several new drugs and combinations. However, very few specific evidences are available about bortezomib re-use at first relapse. This multicenter, observational, retrospective study enrolled 134 MM patients with significant response after bortezomib-based frontline regimens and who had received a first salvage treatment containing bortezomib at relapse. The overall response rate was 71%, including 40% partial responses, 24% very good partial responses, and 7% complete responses. Re-treatment was well-tolerated, with no significant new or unexpected toxicities observed. The median duration of second progression-free survival (PFS) was 15 months, while median PFS2 was 55 months. With a median follow-up of 56 months, overall survival was 94 months for the entire series, without significant differences between patients undergoing or not undergoing transplant procedures. This real-life survey indicates that re-treatment including bortezomib as a first salvage therapy could be still considered in MM patients achieving durable response after initial exposure to bortezomib.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kumar SK, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Gertz MA, Buadi FK, Pandey S, Kapoor P, Dingli D, Hayman SR, Leung N, Lust J, McCurdy A, Russell SJ, Zeldenrust SR, Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV (2014) Continued improvement in survival in multiple myeloma: changes in early mortality and outcomes in older patients. Leukemia 28:1122–1128. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2013.313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blimark CH, Turesson I, Genell A, Ahlberg L, Björkstrand B, Carlson K, Forsberg K, Juliusson G, Linder O, Mellqvist UH, Nahi H, Kristinsson SY, for the Swedish Myeloma Registry (2018) Outcome and survival of myeloma patients diagnosed 2008-2015. Real-world data on 4904 patients from the Swedish Myeloma Registry. Haematologica 103:506–513. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2017.178103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cavo M, Terpos E, Bargay J, Einsele H, Cavet J, Greil R, de Wit E (2018) The multiple myeloma treatment landscape: international guideline recommendations and clinical practice in Europe. Expert Rev Hematol 11:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2018.1437345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar SK, Rajkumar V, Kyle RA, van Duin M, Sonneveld P, Mateos MV, Gay F, Anderson KC (2017) Multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Dis Prim 3:17046. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gay F, Engelhardt M, Terpos E, Wäsch R, Giaccone L, Auner HW, Caers J, Gramatzki M, van de Donk N, Oliva S, Zamagni E, Garderet L, Straka C, Hajek R, Ludwig H, Einsele H, Dimopoulos M, Boccadoro M, Kröger N, Cavo M, Goldschmidt H, Bruno B, Sonneveld P (2018) From transplant to novel cellular therapies in multiple myeloma: European Myeloma Network guidelines and future perspectives. Haematologica 103:197–211. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2017.174573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sonneveld P (2017) Management of multiple myeloma in the relapsed/refractory patient. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Progr 2017:508–517. https://doi.org/10.1182/asheducation-2017.1.508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Offidani M, Corvatta L, Bringhen S, Gentili S, Troia R, Maracci L, Larocca A, Gay F, Leoni P, Boccadoro M (2017) Salvage therapy in first relapse: a retrospective study in a large patient population with multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol 98:289–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.12834

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chim CS, Kumar SK, Orlowski RZ, Cook G, Richardson PG, Gertz MA, Giralt S, Mateos MV, Leleu X, Anderson KC (2018) Management of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: novel agents, antibodies, immunotherapies and beyond. Leukemia 32:252–262. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2017.329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Conner TM, Doan QD, Walters IB et al (2008) An observational, retrospective analysis of retreatment with bortezomib for multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 8:140–145. https://doi.org/10.3816/CLM.2008.n.016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hrusovsky I, Emmerich B, von Rohr A, Voegeli J, Taverna C, Olie RA, Pliskat H, Frohn C, Hess G (2010) Bortezomib retreatment in relapsed multiple myeloma - results from a retrospective multicentre survey in Germany and Switzerland. Oncology 79:247–254. https://doi.org/10.1159/000322866

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Taverna C, Voegeli J, Trojan A et al (2012) Effective response with bortezomib retreatment in relapsed multiple myeloma – a multicentre retrospective survey in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly 142:w13562. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2012.13562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wolf J, Richardson PG, Schuster M, LeBlanc A, Walters IB, Battleman DS (2008) Utility of bortezomib retreatment in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients: a multicenter case series. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 6:755–760

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Oriol A, Giraldo P, Kotsianidis I, Couturier C, Olie R, Angermund R, Corso A (2015) Efficacy and safety of bortezomib-based retreatment at the first relapse in multiple myeloma patients: a retrospective study. Hematology 20:405–409. https://doi.org/10.1179/1607845414Y.0000000218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Petrucci MT, Giraldo P, Corradini P, Teixeira A, Dimopoulos MA, Blau IW, Drach J, Angermund R, Allietta N, Broer E, Mitchell V, Bladé J (2013) A prospective, international phase 2 study of bortezomib retreatment in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 160:649–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.12198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sood R, Carloss H, Kerr R, Lopez J, Lee M, Druck M, Walters IB, Noga SJ (2009) Retreatment with bortezomib alone or in combination for patients with multiple myeloma following an initial response to bortezomib. Am J Hematol 84:657–660. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.21517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Terpos E, Gobbi M, Potamianou A, Lahaye M, Couturier C, Cavo M (2018) Retreatment and prolonged therapy with subcutaneous bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: a randomized, controlled, phase III study. Eur J Haematol 100:10–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.12937

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar S, Paiva B, Anderson KC, Durie B, Landgren O, Moreau P, Munshi N, Lonial S, Bladé J, Mateos MV, Dimopoulos M, Kastritis E, Boccadoro M, Orlowski R, Goldschmidt H, Spencer A, Hou J, Chng WJ, Usmani SZ, Zamagni E, Shimizu K, Jagannath S, Johnsen HE, Terpos E, Reiman A, Kyle RA, Sonneveld P, Richardson PG, McCarthy P, Ludwig H, Chen W, Cavo M, Harousseau JL, Lentzsch S, Hillengass J, Palumbo A, Orfao A, Rajkumar SV, Miguel JS, Avet-Loiseau H (2016) International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 17:e328–e346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30206-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Raab MS, Cavo M, Delforge M, Driessen C, Fink L, Flinois A, Gonzalez-McQuire S, Safaei R, Karlin L, Mateos MV, Schoen P, Yong K (2016) Multiple myeloma: practice patterns across Europe. Br J Haematol 175:66–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.14193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Knopf KB, Duh MS, Lafeuille M-H, Gravel J, Lefebvre P, Niculescu L, Ba-Mancini A, Ma E, Shi H, Comenzo RL (2014) Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of bortezomib re-treatment in patients with multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 14:380–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2014.03.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stadtmauer EA, Weber DM, Niesvizky R, Belch A, Prince MH, San Miguel JF, Facon T, Olesnyckyj M, Yu Z, Zeldis JB, Knight RD, Dimopoulos MA (2009) Lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone at first relapse in comparison with its use as later salvage therapy in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol 82:426–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01257.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Dimopoulos MA, Lonial S, White D, Moreau P, Palumbo A, San-Miguel J, Shpilberg O, Anderson K, Grosicki S, Spicka I, Walter-Croneck A, Magen H, Mateos MV, Belch A, Reece D, Beksac M, Bleickardt E, Poulart V, Sheng J, Sy O, Katz J, Singhal A, Richardson P (2017) Elotuzumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: ELOQUENT-2 follow-up and post-hoc analyses on progression-free survival and tumour growth. Br J Haematol 178:896–905. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.14787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Mateos MV, Masszi T, Grzasko N, Hansson M, Sandhu I, Pour L, Viterbo L, Jackson SR, Stoppa AM, Gimsing P, Hamadani M, Borsaru G, Berg D, Lin J, di Bacco A, van de Velde H, Richardson PG, Moreau P (2017) Impact of prior therapy on the efficacy and safety of oral ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs. placebo-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in TOURMALINE-MM1. Haematologica 102:1767–1775. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2017.170118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Dimopoulos MA, Stewart AK, Masszi T, Špička I, Oriol A, Hájek R, Rosiñol L, Siegel D, Mihaylov GG, Goranova-Marinova V, Rajnics P, Suvorov A, Niesvizky R, Jakubowiak A, San-Miguel J, Ludwig H, Ro S, Aggarwal S, Moreau P, Palumbo A (2017) Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs lenalidomide-dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma by previous treatment. Blood Cancer J 7:e554. https://doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2017.31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Siegel DS, Dimopoulos MA, Ludwig H, Facon T, Goldschmidt H, Jakubowiak A, San-Miguel J, Obreja M, Blaedel J, Stewart AK (2018) Improvement in overall survival with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 36(8):728–734. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.76.5032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dimopoulos MA, Goldschmidt H, Niesvizky R, Joshua D, Chng WJ, Oriol A, Orlowski RZ, Ludwig H, Facon T, Hajek R, Weisel K, Hungria V, Minuk L, Feng S, Zahlten-Kumeli A, Kimball AS, Moreau P (2017) Carfilzomib or bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): an interim overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 18(10):1327–1337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30578-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Spencer A, Hungria VTM, Mateos M-V et al (2017) Daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) versus bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): updated efficacy and safety analysis of castor. Blood 130:3145 http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/130/Suppl_1/3145

    Google Scholar 

  27. Moreau P, Oriol A, Kaufman JL et al (2017) Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (DRd) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) based on prior treatment history, renal function, and cytogenetic risk: subgroup analyses of pollux. Blood 130:1883 http://www.bloodjournal.org/content/130/Suppl_1/1883

    Google Scholar 

  28. Moreau P, Pylypenko H, Grosicki S, Karamanesht I, Leleu X, Grishunina M, Rekhtman G, Masliak Z, Robak T, Shubina A, Arnulf B, Kropff M, Cavet J, Esseltine DL, Feng H, Girgis S, van de Velde H, Deraedt W, Harousseau JL (2011) Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of bortezomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority study. Lancet Oncol 12:431–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70081-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bringhen S, Larocca A, Rossi D, Cavalli M, Genuardi M, Ria R, Gentili S, Patriarca F, Nozzoli C, Levi A, Guglielmelli T, Benevolo G, Callea V, Rizzo V, Cangialosi C, Musto P, de Rosa L, Liberati AM, Grasso M, Falcone AP, Evangelista A, Cavo M, Gaidano G, Boccadoro M, Palumbo A (2010) Efficacy and safety of once-weekly bortezomib in multiple myeloma patients. Blood 116:4745–4753. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-07-294983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by a dedicated donation from Janssen-Cilag Italy and by Current Research Funds 2016 from the Italian Ministry of Health to IRCCS-CROB.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PM designed the study and is the responsible for the concept of this manuscript; VS analyzed database and performed statistical analysis; NC, AF, MTP, LC, FDR, CC, RR, LC, DS, LM, AG, OV, GP, GD, GM, SB, MG, NDR, GR, AG, TC, and MB recruited patients and provided relevant data; DS and GM collected, assembled, and managed database; PM, SM, and AC coordinated the various authors and wrote the paper. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript drafts, approved the final version, and made the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pellegrino Musto.

Ethics declarations

After Local Ethic Committee approval, charts of 134 MM eligible patients treated in 12 Italian centers from January 2002 to May 2015 were reviewed. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Due to the restrospective, observational nature of the study and according to current Italian law, obligatory informed consent was not necessary from all patients for being included in the study. Bortezomib-based treatments were performed according to current clinical practice at local institutions.

Conflict of interest

Regarding possible COI with the present paper, PM has participated to Advisory Boards of and has received honoraria from Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, BMS, Amgen, and Takeda; MTP is a member of the Advisory Board and has received honoraria from Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, BMS, Amgen, and Takeda; RR is a member of the Advisory Board of Janssen-Cilag, Consultant for CSL Behring and Speakers bureau for Janssen-Cilag, Celgene, Italfarmaco, BMS, Amgen, and CSL Behring; TC is a member of the Advisory board of Janssen-Cilag, Celgene, BMS, Amgen, and Takeda and received research funds from Celgene; SB is a member of the Advisory Board of Janssen-Cilag, Amgen, and Takeda and received honoraria from Janssen and Cilag, Celgene, Amgen, and BMS; MB is a member of the Advisory Board and has received honoraria from Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, BMS, Amgen, and Takeda. Other authors did not declare any COI.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 63 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Musto, P., Simeon, V., Cascavilla, N. et al. Is re-challenge still an option as salvage therapy in multiple myeloma? The case of REal-life BOrtezomib re-Use as secoND treatment for relapsed patients exposed frontline to bortezomib-based therapies (the REBOUND Study). Ann Hematol 98, 361–367 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-018-3524-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-018-3524-1

Keywords

Navigation